Background and objectives: The Rh D antigen comprises a mosaic of at least 30 epitopes expressed on a 30-kD non-glycosylated Rh D polypeptide. The equivalent Rh CeEe polypeptide expressing the Rh C/c and E/e antigens differs in only 36 of the 417 amino acid residues. Partial D individuals have been described who fail to express a number of D epitopes. Materials and methods:Serologic methods were applied with monoclonal anti-D to map epitopes on the red cells of a proposita aberrant D typing. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA sequencing were also done. Results: DNA sequence analysis derived by RT-PCR using total RNA isolated from peripheral blood of this person suggests two mechanisms for the genetic basis of this variants: one where gene conversion events result in the replacement of RHD gene exons with the equivalent RHCE exons; the second where point mutation in the RFID gene generates an amino acid substitution in the Rh D protein. Conclusions: We report here a new partial D,DHR, where a single point mutation (G to A at nucleotide 686) in exon 5 of the RHD gene results in a conservative amino acid substitution (Arg229Lys), in the predicted Rh D protein. This residue is localised on the fourth predicted exofacial loop of the Rh D polypeptide as determined by hydropathy analysis. This substitution results in the lack of epD 1,2,12 and 20(30 epitope model) and indicates the involvement of loop 4, and in particular the requirement of Arg(229), in the expression of these epitopes.

This content is only available via PDF.
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.