Abdominal actinomycosis is a rare, chronic, and often unrecognized suppurative disease. It is caused by an anaerobic gram-positive bacterium, most commonly Actinomyces israeli. Colonic actinomycosis is rarely reported and may be responsible for a pseudotumoral syndrome leading, in the suspicion of malignancy, to a large and mutilating excisional surgery. It is usually the histopathological examination of the surgical specimens that accurately corrects the diagnosis. Here, we report a rare case of a colic actinomycotic involvement taking a pseudotumoral form. The diagnosis was made based on the pathological examination of the surgical piece. Intravenous and then adjuvant oral penicillin G treatment has allowed a favorable clinical evolution. This observation illustrates the preoperative diagnostic difficulties of this rare disease.

Actinomycosis is a rare granulomatous, suppurative, and fibrotic chronic infectious disease caused by Actinomyces [1]. The latter are gram-positive, anaerobic bacilli, represented in 85% of cases by Actinomyces israelii [1]. Actinomyces are part of the commensal flora of the oropharynx, the digestive tract, and occasionally the vagina. The most frequent locations are respectively, cervicofacial (55%), abdominal (20%), and thoracic (15%) [2-5]. Actinomycosis can sit anywhere in the abdominal cavity but predominates in the ceco-appendicular region [6-8] and extends to surrounding structures across fascia and connective tissues. Moreover, the infiltrative and aggressive patterns are very indicative of actinomycosis. The left side of the colon is rarely reported to be affected [9]. Actinomycosis is not very virulent but may become pathogenic after breaking of the intestinal mucosal barrier (trauma, surgical procedure, or infection) [2, 10-13] or weakening of tissue resistance (immunodepression, diabetes, or corticosteroid therapy) [14]. Diagnosis of actinomycosis in our patient was made after histological analysis of the operative specimen. Here, we report a rare case of colic pseudotumoral actinomycosis.

A 48-year-old male patient native and living in eastern Morocco presented with a 3-week history of left iliac fossa pain and mass with a general health state deterioration and fever (38°C). The clinical examination found a sensitive left iliac fossa mass. Colonoscopy showed a prestenotic sigmoidal zone with pseudo-polyps. The results of the biopsy were in favor of congestive colitis with neither a tuberculoid granuloma nor an abscess or suspicious elements. Blood tests showed a slightly increased WBC count (11,070/mm3) and a C-reactive protein of 53.08 mg/L. Basic abdominal X-ray showed air-fluid levels, whereas abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an irregular thickening of the descending colon with infiltration of its wall (Fig. 1). Surgical exploration found an abscessed tumor of the left colon. A carcinologic left segmental colectomy with latero-lateral mechanical anastomosis was performed (Fig. 2). The intervention went well and was tolerated by the patient without any unwanted adverse events. The histopathological examination was in favor of colonic actinomycosis (Fig. 3). The postoperative course was without incident. Penicillin-based oral therapy (amoxicillin 2 g/day) for 6 months allowed a complete cure.

Fig. 1.

Irregular thickening of the descending colon with infiltration of the wall.

Fig. 1.

Irregular thickening of the descending colon with infiltration of the wall.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Abscessed tumor of the left colon found during segmental carcinologic colectomy.

Fig. 2.

Abscessed tumor of the left colon found during segmental carcinologic colectomy.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

a Numerous bacterial colonies found at the center of a fibrinous tissue. b Bacterial colonies with basophilic radiating filaments which are a key feature of actinomycosis.

Fig. 3.

a Numerous bacterial colonies found at the center of a fibrinous tissue. b Bacterial colonies with basophilic radiating filaments which are a key feature of actinomycosis.

Close modal

Abdomino-pelvic actinomycosis is rare and its diagnosis is often difficult and delayed. It was nicknamed the “great simulator” because of the lack of specificity of its symptoms [14]. Indeed, the onset is insidious and progressive, associated with a general state of deterioration, an infectious syndrome, and a pseudotumoral syndrome [2, 11], which can simulate cancer, tuberculosis, or Crohn’s disease. These pseudotumoral masses can progress towards abscess formation with a risk of secondary rupture and fistulization. The most serious complication is peritonitis due to rupture of an abscess [2]. In our case, the symptomatology was in favor of colon cancer which led us to carry out a carcinologic excision. In actinomycosis, biology is not very contributive and usually consists of a marked inflammatory syndrome [2, 11]. Colonoscopy is generally not helpful in diagnosis when the disease is of an extramucosal origin. Furthermore, endoscopy plays a significant role in excluding colitis or malignant disease and revealing a lumen narrowing or parietal stiffness [15]. Radiological examinations (ultrasound, barium enema, and CT) are not specific [2, 11, 16]. However, CT scan may help in characterizing mass-like structures. Its common finding is concentric bowel wall thickening, associated with an adjacent cystic or solid mass surrounded by prominent inflammatory infiltrations [17]. Solid portions of the mass and soft-tissue strands around it enhance strongly following contrast material injection. The aggressive nature of the mass is suggestive of a tumor. However, regional lymph nodes are rarely present [15]. Although the infiltrative nature of abdominal actinomycosis is unrestricted, it is unlikely to spread into the entire peritoneal cavity. Ascites are usually minimal or absent [17]. CT can also demonstrate a pseudotumor appearance that does not respect tissue limits [15].

Bacteriological diagnosis is possible, and the bacteriologist should be warned about the suspicion of actinomycosis. The culture performed under anaerobic conditions in a CO2-rich atmosphere and can only be positive in about 50% of cases [2]. Importantly, the definitive diagnosis may only be possible based on the pathological examination of the surgical specimens on the basis of the characteristic finding of “sulfur granules,” which represent tangled filaments of Actinomyces species (named for their yellow color) [15, 18]. Special staining such as Gomori methenamine silver can be used to illustrate the composition of sulfur granules such as branching bacteria and not fungi, cocci, or bacilli as they may occur in other infectious diseases such as eumycetoma and nocardiosis [12, 19, 20]. The extemporaneous examination sometimes makes it possible to correct the diagnosis, thus avoiding large, difficult, and useless excisions [11, 19]. Notably, other differential diagnoses such as cancer, tuberculosis, Crohn’s disease, amoebiasis, or appendicitis are to be considered in such cases [3, 21]. The treatment is mainly based on intravenous penicillin antibiotics, with oral relay for 6–12 months to prevent recurrence [16, 22]. In practice, surgery is often a diagnostic step [19, 22] and it should be indicated in cases of acute presentations such as appendicular peritonitis, obstruction, or abscess perforation. Prognostic outcomes in colic actinomycosis remain serious in the absence of treatment, but the disease evolves well in cases of early diagnosis and adapted treatment (Table 1). Immunodepression is an adverse prognostic factor for actinomycosis evolution under different therapies [9]. Actinomycosis is a diagnostic challenge; it is often unrecognized and frequently confused with a malignant or chronic granulomatous disease [12]. Although clinical, biological, and radiological features are not specific, actinomycosis should be considered in the case of any abdominal mass that presents a highly infiltrative nature, strong enhancement CT scan, and suppurative necrosis. Notably, the pseudotumoral aspect of a colonic mass with a mucosa of normal aspect on endoscopy should alert the clinician of this rare entity. Actinomycosis diagnosis confirmation is based on histopathological examination. Penicillin G is the drug of choice and should be the first line of treatment in mild forms of the disease. For persistent disease and complicated cases, combined medical and surgical treatment may be considered, such as in our case. In any colonic mass with negative endoscopy, actinomycosis must always be considered with other malignant and inflammatory etiologies.

Table 1.

Summary of large studies and literature reviews regarding treatment outcomes of pseudotumoral actinomycosis

Summary of large studies and literature reviews regarding treatment outcomes of pseudotumoral actinomycosis
Summary of large studies and literature reviews regarding treatment outcomes of pseudotumoral actinomycosis

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. CARE guidelines were applied for reporting this case report finding.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1.
Wong
VK
,
Turmezei
TD
,
Weston
VC
.
Actinomycosis
.
BMJ
.
2011
Oct
;
343
oct11 3
:
d6099
.
[PubMed]
0959-8138
2.
Boyanova
L
,
Kolarov
R
,
Mateva
L
,
Markovska
R
,
Mitov
I
.
Actinomycosis: a frequently forgotten disease
.
Future Microbiol
.
2015
;
10
(
4
):
613
28
.
[PubMed]
1746-0913
3.
Kacem
C
,
Puisieux
F
,
Kammoun
A
,
Morched
AM
,
Zaouche
A
.
Actinomycosis of the abdomen: about three cases and review of the literature
.
Ann Med Interne (Paris)
.
2000
;
151
:
243
7
.
[PubMed]
0003-410X
4.
Privitera
A
,
Milkhu
CS
,
Datta
V
,
Rodriguez-Justo
M
,
Windsor
A
,
Cohen
CR
.
Actinomycosis of the sigmoid colon: A case report
.
World J Gastrointest Surg
.
2009
Nov
;
1
(
1
):
62
4
.
[PubMed]
1948-9366
5.
Pusiol
T
,
Morichetti
D
,
Pedrazzani
C
,
Ricci
F
.
Abdominal-pelvic actinomycosis mimicking malignant neoplasm
.
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol
.
2011
;
2011
:
747059
.
[PubMed]
1064-7449
6.
Kim
SY
,
Lee
SK
,
Moon
SB
.
Abdominal actinomycosis complicated by delayed splenic abscess
.
Surg Infect (Larchmt)
.
2014
Oct
;
15
(
5
):
662
4
.
[PubMed]
1096-2964
7.
Wacharachaisurapol
N
,
Bender
JM
,
Wang
L
,
Bliss
D
,
Ponrartana
S
,
Pannaraj
PS
.
Abdominal Actinomycosis in Children: A Case Report and Literature Review
.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
.
2017
Mar
;
36
(
3
):
e76
9
.
[PubMed]
0891-3668
8.
Valko
P
,
Busolini
E
,
Donati
N
,
Chimchila Chevili
S
,
Rusca
T
,
Bernasconi
E
.
Severe large bowel obstruction secondary to infection with Actinomyces israelii
.
Scand J Infect Dis
.
2006
;
38
(
3
):
231
4
.
[PubMed]
0036-5548
9.
Pierre
I
,
Zarrouk
V
,
Noussair
L
,
Molina
JM
,
Fantin
B
.
Invasive actinomycosis: surrogate marker of a poor prognosis in immunocompromised patients
.
Int J Infect Dis
.
2014
Dec
;
29
:
74
9
.
[PubMed]
1201-9712
10.
Lisa-Gracia
M
,
Martín-Rivas
B
,
Pajarón-Guerrero
M
,
Arnáiz-García
A
.
Abdominal actinomycosis in the last 10 years and risk factors for appendiceal actinomycosis: review of the literature
.
Turk J Med Sci
.
2017
Feb
;
47
(
1
):
98
102
.
[PubMed]
1300-0144
11.
Noomene
F
,
Zouari
K
,
Kallel
W
, et al
Abdominal actinomycosis: 3 observations
.
Presse Med
.
2003
;
32
:
698700
.0755-4982
12.
Vialle
R
,
Bernier
M
,
L’helgouarc’h
JL
,
Huerre
M
,
Attal
E
,
Frileux
P
.
Actinomycosis of the colon: clinical, endoscopic and pathological aspects of a case
.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol
.
2001
;
25
:
908
11
.
[PubMed]
0399-8320
13.
García-García
A
,
Ramírez-Durán
N
,
Sandoval-Trujillo
H
,
Romero-Figueroa
MD
.
Pelvic Actinomycosis
.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol
.
2017
;
2017
:
9428650
.
[PubMed]
1712-9532
14.
Sehnal
B
,
Beneš
J
,
Kolářová
Z
,
Mojhová
M
,
Zikán
M
.
Pelvic actinomycosis and IUD
.
Ceska Gynekol
.
2018
;
83
(
5
):
386
90
.
[PubMed]
1210-7832
15.
Kim
JC
,
Ahn
BY
,
Kim
HC
,
Yu
CS
,
Kang
GH
,
Ha
HK
, et al
Efficiency of combined colonoscopy and computed tomography for diagnosis of colonic actinomycosis: a retrospective evaluation of eight consecutive patients
.
Int J Colorectal Dis
.
2000
Aug
;
15
(
4
):
236
42
.
[PubMed]
0179-1958
16.
Rose
G
,
Franke
FE
,
Weimar
B
,
Buhr
J
,
Padberg
W
.
[Actinomycosis of the colon as a rare differential diagnosis of colonic carcinoma]
.
Chirurg
.
2000
Jan
;
71
(
1
):
93
7
.
[PubMed]
0009-4722
17.
Heo
SH
,
Shin
SS
,
Kim
JW
,
Lim
HS
,
Seon
HJ
,
Jung
SI
, et al
Imaging of actinomycosis in various organs: a comprehensive review
.
Radiographics
.
2014
Jan-Feb
;
34
(
1
):
19
33
.
[PubMed]
0271-5333
18.
Ferrari
TC
,
Couto
CA
,
Murta-Oliveira
C
,
Conceição
SA
,
Silva
RG
;
T. C. A. Ferrari, C. A. Couto, C. M
.
Actinomycosis of the colon: a rare form of presentation
.
Scand J Gastroenterol
.
2000
Jan
;
35
(
1
):
108
9
.
[PubMed]
0036-5521
19.
Smego
RA
 Jr
,
Foglia
G
.
Actinomycosis
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
1998
Jun
;
26
(
6
):
1255
61
.
[PubMed]
1058-4838
20.
Tlili-Graiess
K
,
Arifa-Achour
N
,
Mrad Dali
K
,
Sriha
B
,
Dahmen
Y
,
Bakir
D
, et al
[Abdominal actinomycosis. Report of 4 clinical cases studied with radiography]
.
J Radiol
.
2001
Jan
;
82
(
1
):
67
72
.
[PubMed]
0221-0363
21.
Baraket
O
,
Itaimi
A
,
Triki
W
,
Moussa
M
,
Ayed
K
,
Ben Hmida
S
, et al
Difficultés diagnostiques et thérapeutiques de l’actinomycose abdominale : à propos d’une observation chez une patiente tunisienne
.
[Therapeutic and diagnostic difficulties of abdominal actinomycosis: about one case in a Tunisian female patient]
.
Bull Soc Pathol Exot
.
2016
May
;
109
(
2
):
84
6
.
[PubMed]
0037-9085
22.
Russo
TA
. Agents of actinomycosis. In:
Mandell
GL
,
Bennett
JE
,
Dolin
R
, editors
.
Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases
. 7th ed.
Philadelphia (Pa)
:
Churchill Livingstone Elsevier
;
2010
. pp.
3209
19
.
23.
Târcoveanu
E
,
Vasilescu
A
,
Andronic
D
,
Lupaşcu
C
,
Ciobanu
D
,
Vlad
N
, et al
Abdominal Actinomycosis Mimicking Colon Cancer
.
Chirurgia (Bucur)
.
2019
Mar-Apr
;
114
(
2
):
251
8
.
[PubMed]
1221-9118
24.
Sung
HY
,
Lee
IS
,
Kim
SI
,
Jung
SE
,
Kim
SW
,
Kim
SY
, et al
Clinical features of abdominal actinomycosis: a 15-year experience of a single institute
.
J Korean Med Sci
.
2011
Jul
;
26
(
7
):
932
7
.
[PubMed]
1011-8934
25.
Choi
MM
,
Baek
JH
,
Lee
JN
,
Park
S
,
Lee
WS
.
Clinical features of abdominopelvic actinomycosis: report of twenty cases and literature review
.
Yonsei Med J
.
2009
Aug
;
50
(
4
):
555
9
.
[PubMed]
0513-5796
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.