Background: Care pathways are primarily aimed at decreasing length of hospital stay (LOS) and preventing unnecessary costs while maintaining or improving the quality of care. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there is insufficient evidence for proving an impact upon postoperative complications. Methods: In this retrospective study, logistic regression was used to calculate a propensity score, and, after carrying out 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, 296 patients were analyzed in both groups with regard to postoperative complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification system as a primary aim. In addition, secondary aims were LOS, compliance to care, and deviation from the care pathway with respect to patient discharge. Relative risk of the primary outcome was calculated and compared with the e-value as sensitivity testing approach. Results: Due to the mandatory part of the care pathway, patient record compliance was 100%. Deviation from the care pathway with respect to the planned patient discharge on postoperative day 2 was noted in 16% of the cases. After adjustment for potential factors, the relative risk when comparing Clavien-Dindo complication grades 0 versus 1–4 is 1.64 (95% CI 0.87–3.11), which did not reach significance (p = 0.127). After matching, LOS lasted 3.69 days without and 3.26 days with the care pathway, respectively. Conclusions: Against the background of already implemented structured standard operation procedures, a care pathway is not able to reduce postoperative complications. Nevertheless, we consider our clinical pathway a highly valuable tool for the interdisciplinary management of patient hospitalization under the supervision of experienced specialized surgeons.

1.
Kohn
LT
,
Corrigan
JM
,
Donaldson
MS
.
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
.
Washington (D.C)
:
The National Academy Press
;
2000
.
2.
Howell
AM
,
Panesar
SS
,
Burns
EM
,
Donaldson
LJ
,
Darzi
A
.
Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery
.
Ann Surg
.
2014
Apr
;
259
(
4
):
630
41
.
[PubMed]
0003-4932
3.
Hull
L
,
Arora
S
,
Aggarwal
R
,
Darzi
A
,
Vincent
C
,
Sevdalis
N
.
The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review
.
J Am Coll Surg
.
2012
Feb
;
214
(
2
):
214
30
.
[PubMed]
1072-7515
4.
Vanhaecht
K
,
Panella
M
,
Van Zelm
R
,
Sermeus
W
.
An overview on the history and concept of care pathways as complex interventions.
Int J Care Pathways. DOI: .
5.
Rotter
T
,
Kinsman
L
,
James
E
,
Machotta
A
,
Willis
J
,
Snow
P
, et al.
Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a Cochrane review appropriate? Response to the commentary article published by Kris Vanhaecht et al
.
Eval Health Prof
.
2012
Mar
;
35
(
1
):
43
6
.
[PubMed]
0163-2787
6.
Rotter
T
,
Kinsman
L
,
James
EL
,
Machotta
A
,
Gothe
H
,
Willis
J
, et al.
Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review and meta-analysis
.
Eval Health Prof
. 0163-2787
7.
Zhang
M
,
Zhou
SY
,
Xing
MY
,
Xu
J
,
Shi
XX
,
Zheng
SS
.
The application of clinical pathways in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int
.
2014
Aug
;
13
(
4
):
348
53
.
[PubMed]
1499-3872
8.
Vandenbroucke
JP
,
von Elm
E
,
Altman
DG
,
Gøtzsche
PC
,
Mulrow
CD
,
Pocock
SJ
, et al.;
STROBE Initiative
.
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration10* for the STROBE initiative
.
Int J Surg
.
2014
Dec
;
12
(
12
):
1500
24
.
[PubMed]
1743-9191
9.
Ogrinc
G
,
Davies
L
,
Goodman
D
,
Batalden
P
,
Davidoff
F
,
Stevens
D
.
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
.
BMJ Qual Saf
.
2016
Dec
;
25
(
12
):
986
92
.
[PubMed]
2044-5423
10.
Pinnock
H
,
Barwick
M
,
Carpenter
CR
,
Eldridge
S
,
Grandes
G
,
Griffiths
CJ
, et al.;
StaRI Group
.
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
.
BMJ Open
.
2017
Apr
;
7
(
4
):
e013318
.
[PubMed]
2044-6055
11.
Van Der Weele
TJ
,
Ding
P
.
Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-Value
.
Ann Intern Med
. 0003-4819
12.
Austin
PC
.
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples
.
Stat Med
.
2009
Nov
;
28
(
25
):
3083
107
.
[PubMed]
0277-6715
13.
Topal
B
,
Peeters
G
,
Verbert
A
,
Penninckx
F
.
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increases hospital bed capacity
.
Surg Endosc
.
2007
Jul
;
21
(
7
):
1142
6
.
[PubMed]
0930-2794
14.
Pearson
SD
,
Kleefield
SF
,
Soukop
JR
,
Cook
EF
,
Lee
TH
.
Critical pathways intervention to reduce length of hospital stay
.
Am J Med
.
2001
Feb
;
110
(
3
):
175
80
.
[PubMed]
0002-9343
15.
Uchiyama
K
,
Takifuji
K
,
Tani
M
,
Onishi
H
,
Yamaue
H
.
Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery
.
Surg Endosc
.
2002
Nov
;
16
(
11
):
1594
7
.
[PubMed]
0930-2794
16.
Calland
JF
,
Tanaka
K
,
Foley
E
,
Bovbjerg
VE
,
Markey
DW
,
Blome
S
, et al.
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway
.
Ann Surg
.
2001
May
;
233
(
5
):
704
15
.
[PubMed]
0003-4932
17.
Müller
MK
,
Dedes
KJ
,
Dindo
D
,
Steiner
S
,
Hahnloser
D
,
Clavien
PA
.
Impact of clinical pathways in surgery
.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
.
2009
Jan
;
394
(
1
):
31
9
.
[PubMed]
1435-2443
18.
Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr
.
2014
. 12/1 – Cholezystektomie. Qualitätsindikatoren. [cited 2019 May 11]. Available from: https://www.sqg.de/downloads/Bundesauswertungen/2014/bu_Gesamt_12N1-CHOL_2014.pdf
19.
Vanhaecht
K
,
Ovretveit
J
,
Elliott
MJ
,
Sermeus
W
,
Ellershaw
J
,
Panella
M
.
Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a Cochrane review appropriate?
Eval Health Prof
.
2012
Mar
;
35
(
1
):
28
42
.
[PubMed]
0163-2787
20.
Hulley
SB
,
Cummings
SR
,
Browner
WS
.
Grady D g., Newman TB Designing clinical research
. 4th ed.
Philadelphia
:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business
;
2013
.
21.
Geschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung Hessen Cholecystektomie - Jahresauswertung
.
2018
[cited 2019 May 11]. Available from: https://www.gqhnet.de/leistungsbereiche/Cholezystektomie/12-1-cholezystektomie
22.
Lonjon
G
,
Porcher
R
,
Ergina
P
,
Fouet
M
,
Boutron
I
.
Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review
.
Ann Surg
.
2017
May
;
265
(
5
):
901
9
.
[PubMed]
0003-4932
23.
Lonjon
G
,
Boutron
I
,
Trinquart
L
,
Ahmad
N
,
Aim
F
,
Nizard
R
, et al.
Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures
.
Ann Surg
.
2014
Jan
;
259
(
1
):
18
25
.
[PubMed]
0003-4932
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.