Hintergrund: Angesichts des angenommenen Einflusses interpersonaler Hoffnungslosigkeit für die Entstehung aktiver Suizidgedanken, wie von der Interpersonalen Theorie Suizidalen Verhaltens [Joiner. Why people die by suicide. 2005] postuliert, zielt diese Studie darauf ab, erstmals eine deutsche Version der Interpersonalen Hoffnungslosigkeitsskala [IHS; Tucker et al. Psychiatry Res. 2018;259:427–32], die IHS-d, vorzustellen und psychometrisch zu überprüfen. Material und Methoden:N = 437 Teilnehmende (75.1% weiblich) zwischen 18 und 71 Jahren (M = 29.75, SD = 11.25) nahmen an einer querschnittlichen Online-Studie teil. Die Faktorstruktur der IHS-d wurde mittels konfirmatorischer Faktorenanalyse überprüft. Zusätzlich wurden Konstruktvalidität und Reliabilität evaluiert. Ergebnis: Es ergab sich eine signifikant bessere Datenpassung für ein 2-Faktor-Modell als für das 1-Faktor-Modell. Die identifizierten Subskalen (Interpersonale Hoffnungslosigkeit hinsichtlich perceived burdensomeness und hinsichtlich thwarted belongingness) erzielten hohe Faktorladungen ≥0.75; Inter-Item-Korrelationen, r ≥ 0.60, Item-Skala-Korrelationen, rit ≥ 0.71 und interne Konsistenzen, αPB = 0.93; αTB = 0.92. Diskussion: Die postulierte einfaktorielle Struktur der englischen Version konnte für die IHS-d nicht reproduziert werden. Die beiden identifizierten Subskalen zeigten jedoch gute psychometrische Eigenschaften. Schlussfolgerung: Der Einsatz der IHS-d erweitert die Möglichkeiten der Messung des wichtigen Konstrukts Hoffnungslosigkeit und kann daher die Suizidrisikoabschätzung sinnvoll ergänzen.

1.
Baertschi
M
,
Costanza
A
,
Richard-Lepouriel
H
,
Pompili
M
,
Sarasin
F
,
Weber
K
,
The application of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide to a sample of Swiss patients attending a psychiatric emergency department for a non-lethal suicidal event
.
J Affect Disord
.
2017
;
210
:
323
31
. .
2.
Beck
AT
,
Kovacs
M
,
Weissman
A
.
Assessment of suicidal intention: the scale for suicide ideation
.
J Consult Clin Psychol
.
1979
;
47
(
2
):
343
52
. .
3.
Beck
AT
,
Weissman
A
,
Lester
D
,
Trexler
L
.
The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale
.
J Consult Clin Psychol
.
1974
;
42
(
6
):
861
65
. .
4.
Beck
AT
,
Steer
RA
.
Manual for the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
.
San Antonio, TX
:
Psychological Cooperation
;
1991
.
5.
Beck
AT
,
Steer
RA
,
Ranieri
WF
.
Scale for suicide ideation: psychometric properties of a self-report version
.
J Clin Psychol
.
1988
;
44
:
499
505
. .
6.
Bentler
PM
.
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
.
Psychol Bull
.
1990
;
107
(
2
):
238
46
. .
7.
Boomsma
A
.
Reporting analyses of covariance structures
.
Struct Equ Model
.
2000
;
7
(
3
):
461
83
. .
8.
Boomsma
A
,
Hoogland
JJ
.
The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited
. In:
Cudeck
R
,
du Toit
S
,
Sörbom
D
, editors.
Structural equation models: present and future
.
Chicago
:
Scientific Software International
;
2001
. p.
139
68
.
9.
Briggs
SR
,
Cheek
JM
.
The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales
.
J Personality
.
1986
;
54
(
1
):
106
48
. .
10.
Brown
TA
.
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
.
New York
:
The Guilford Press
;
2006
.
11.
Brown
GK
,
Ten Have
T
,
Henriques
GR
.
Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: a ran-domized controlled trial
.
JAMA
.
2005
;
294
(
5
):
563
70
. .
12.
Browne
MW
,
Cudeck
R
.
Alternative ways of assessing model fit
.
Sociol Methods Res
.
1992
;
21
(
2
):
230
58
. .
13.
Bühner
M
.
Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion
.
München
:
Pearson
;
2011
.
14.
Carmines
EG
,
McIver
JP
.
An introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables
.
Polit Methodol
.
1983
;
9
(
1
):
51
102
.
15.
Christensen
H
,
Batterham
PJ
,
Soubelet
A
,
Mackinnon
AJ
.
A test of the interpersonal theory of suicide in a large community-based cohort
.
J Affect Disord
.
2013
;
144
(
3
):
225
34
. .
16.
Chu
C
,
Buchman-Schmitt
JM
,
Stanley
IH
,
Hom
MA
,
Tucker
RP
,
Hagan
CR
,
The interpersonal theory of suicide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research
.
Psychol Bull
.
2017
;
143
(
12
):
1313
45
. .
17.
Cohen
J
.
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
.
New York
:
Laurence Erlbaum
;
1988
. .
18.
Evans
E
,
Hawton
K
,
Rodham
K
,
Deeks
J
.
The prevalence of suicidal phenomena in adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies
.
Suicide Life Threat Behav
.
2005
;
35
(
3
):
239
50
. .
19.
Forkmann
T
.
Psychologische Erklärungsmodelle suizidalen Erlebens und Verhaltens
. In:
Teismann
T
,
Forkmann
T
,
Glaesmer
H
, editors.
Suizidales Erleben und Verhalten. Ein Handbuch
.
Köln
:
Psychiatrie-Verlag
;
2021
.
20.
Forkmann
T
,
Brähler
E
,
Gauggel
S
,
Baumert
J
,
Erazo
N
,
Schneider
A
,
Prevalence and covariates of suicidal ideation in the German general population
.
J Nerv Ment Dis
.
2012
;
200
:
401
5
.
21.
Forkmann
T
,
Glaesmer
H
,
Paashaus
L
,
Rath
D
,
Schönfelder
A
,
Juckel
G
,
Testing the four main predictions of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior in an inpatient sample admitted due to severe suicidality
.
Behav Ther
.
2021
;
52
(
3
):
626
38
. .
22.
Forkmann
T
,
Glaesmer
H
,
Paashaus
L
,
Rath
D
,
Schönfelder
A
,
Stengler
K
,
Interpersonal theory of suicide: prospective examination
.
BJPsych Open
.
2020
;
6
(
5
):
e113
.
23.
Glaesmer
H
,
Hallensleben
N
,
Forkmann
T
,
Spangenberg
L
.
Testing the main prediction of the interpersonal theory of suicidal behavior in a representative sample
.
J Affect Disord
.
2017
;
211
:
150
2
.
24.
Glaesmer
H
,
Spangenberg
L
,
Forkmann
T
,
Teismann
T
.
Suicidality: theoretical concepts, risk assessment and treatment options
.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol
.
2020
;
70
(
6
):
252
61
.
25.
Glaesmer
H
,
Spangenberg
L
,
Scherer
A
,
Forkmann
T
.
Die Erfassung von Suizidwünschen: Erste psychometrische Befunde zur Deutschen Version des Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ)
.
Psychiatr Prax
.
2014
;
41
(
5
):
250
6
.
26.
Hagan
CR
,
Podlogar
MC
,
Chu
C
,
Joiner
TE
.
Testing the inter-personal theory of suicide: the moderating role of hopelessness
.
Int J Cogn Ther
.
2015
;
8
(
2
):
99
113
. .
27.
Hagan
CR
,
Ribeiro
JD
,
Joiner
TE
.
Present status and future prospects of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior
. In:
O’Connor
RC
,
Pirkis
J
, editors.
The international handbook of suicide prevention
.
UK
:
John Wiley & Sons
;
2016
. p.
206
19
. .
28.
Holden
R
,
De Lisle
M
.
Factor analysis of the Beck scale for suicide ideation with female suicide attempters
.
Assessment
.
2005
;
12
:
231
8
.
29.
Hoogland
JJ
.
The robustness of estimation methods for covariance structure analysis
. Dissertation.
University of Groningen
;
1999
.
30.
Hu
L
,
Bentler
PM
.
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives
.
Struct Equ Model
.
1999
;
6
(
1
):
1
55
. .
31.
Hu
LT
,
Bentler
PM
,
Kano
Y
.
Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?
Psychol Bull
.
1992
;
112
(
2
):
351
62
. .
32.
Joiner
T
.
Why people die by suicide
.
Cambridge
:
Harvard University Press
;
2005
.
33.
Kliem
S
,
Brähler
E
. Beck-Suizidgedanken-Skala.
Göttingen
:
Hogrefe
;
2016
.
34.
Kliem
S
,
Lohmann
A
,
Mößle
T
,
Brähler
E
.
Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): results from a German representative population sample
.
BMC Psychiatry
.
2018
;
18
:
1
11
.
35.
Klonsky
ED
,
Saffer
BY
,
Bryan
CJ
.
Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update
.
Curr Opin Psychol
.
2018
;
22
:
38
43
.
36.
Kokkevi
A
,
Rotsika
V
,
Arapaki
A
,
Bryan
CJ
.
Adolescents’ self‐re-ported suicide attempts, self‐harm thoughts and their correlates across 17 European countries
.
J Child Psychol Psyc
.
2012
;
53
(
4
):
381
9
. .
37.
Ma
J
,
Batterham
PJ
,
Calear
AL
,
Richardson
C
.
A systematic review of the predictions of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior
.
Clin Psychol Rev
.
2016
;
46
:
34
45
. .
38.
Mandracchia
JT
,
Sunderland
MN
,
To
YM
.
Evaluating the role of interpersonal hopelessness in the interpersonal theory of suicide
.
Death Stud
.
2019
. .
39.
Moosbrugger
H
,
Kelava
A
.
Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion
.
Berlin, Heidelberg
:
Springer
;
2020
.
40.
Nock
MK
,
Borges
G
,
Ono
Y
, editors.
Suicide: global perspectives from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys
.
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
;
2012
.
41.
Nunnally
JC
.
Psychometric theory: 25 years ago and now
.
Edu Res
.
1975
;
4
(
10
):
7
21
. .
42.
Nunnally
JC
,
Bernstein
I
.
Psychometric theory
.
New York
:
McGraw-Hill
;
1978
.
43.
Olsson
UH
,
Foss
T
,
Troye
SV
,
Howell
RD
.
The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality
.
Struct Equ Modeling
.
2000
;
7
(
4
):
557
95
. .
44.
Rath
D
,
Teismann
T
,
Höller
I
,
Glaesmer
H
,
Paashaus
L
,
Schönfelder
A
,
Predicting suicidal ideation in a longitudial high-risk sample: multilevel analyses and 12-month trajectories
.
J Clin Psychol
.
2021
;
77
(
10
):
2353
69
.
45.
Rosseel
Y
.
Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling
.
J Stat Softw
.
2012
;
48
(
2
):
1
36
. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.
46.
Rudd
MD
,
Bryan
CJ
,
Wertenberger
EG
,
Peterson
AL
,
Young-McCaughan
S
,
Mintz
J
,
Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up
.
Am J Psychiatry
.
2015
;
172
(
5
):
441
9
. .
47.
Rush
AJ
,
Kovacs
M
,
Beck
A
,
Weissenburger
J
,
Hollon
SD
.
Differential effects of cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy on depressive symptoms
.
J Affect Disord
.
1981
;
3
(
3
):
221
9
. .
48.
Schermelleh-Engel
K
,
Moosbrugger
H
,
Müller
H
.
Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures
.
Methods Psychol Res Online
.
2003
;
8
(
2
):
23
74
.
49.
Statistisches Bundesamt
.
Todesursachen: Suizide
.
2021
. Available from: www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Todesursachen/Tabellen/suizide.html.
50.
Talley
AE
,
Brown
SL
,
Curkowicz
K
,
Bagge
CL
.
Sexual self-concept ambiguity and the interpersonal theory of suicide risk
.
Suicide Life Threat Behav
.
2016
;
46
(
2
):
127
40
. .
51.
Teismann
T
,
Forkmann
T
,
Glaesmer
H
.
Risikoabschätzung bei suizidalen Patienten: geht das überhaupt?
Verhaltenstherapie
.
2019
;
29
:
80
4
.
52.
Tucker
RP
,
Hagan
CR
,
Hill
RM
,
Slish
ML
,
Bagge
CL
,
Joiner
TE
 Jr
,
Empirical extension of the interpersonal theory of suicide: investigating the role of interpersonal hopelessness
.
Psychiatry Res
.
2018
;
259
:
427
32
. .
53.
Van Orden
KA
,
Cukrowicz
KC
,
Witte
TK
,
Joiner
TE
.
Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
.
Psychol Assess
.
2012
;
24
(
1
):
197
215
. .
54.
Van Orden
KA
,
Witte
TK
,
Cukrowicz
KC
,
Braithwaite
SR
,
Selby
EA
,
Joiner
TE
 Jr
.
The interpersonal theory of suicide
.
Psychol Rev
.
2010
;
117
(
2
):
575
600
. .
55.
Velicer
WF
,
Peacock
AC
,
Jackson
DN
.
A comparison of component and factor patterns: a Monte Carlo approach
.
Multivariate Behav Res
.
1982
;
17
(
3
):
371
88
. .
56.
Weise
G
.
Psychologische Leistungstests: ein Handbuch für Studium und Praxis
.
Hogrefe
:
Göttingen
;
1975
.
57.
West
SG
,
Finch
JF
,
Curran
PJ
.
Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: problems and remedies
. In:
Hoyle
RH
, editor.
Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications
.
Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi
:
Sage Publications
;
1995
. p.
56
75
.
58.
Wolford-Clevenger
C
,
Stuart
GL
,
Elledge
LC
,
McNulty
JK
,
Spirito
A
.
Proximal correlates of suicidal ideation and behaviors: a test of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide
.
Suicide Life Threat Behav
.
2019
;
50
(
1
):
249
62
. .
59.
World Health Organization
.
Suicide in the world: global health estimates
.
Genf
:
World Health Organization
;
2019
.
60.
Zwingmann
C
,
Wirtz
M
,
Müller
C
,
Körber
J
,
Murken
S
.
Positive and negative religious coping in German breast cancer patients
.
J Behav Med
.
2006
;
29
(
6
):
533
47
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.