Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy in bladder cancer patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) remains a matter of debate. The aim of this systematic review was to present available evidence on the safety and efficacy of BCG immunotherapy in patients with ABU. A literature search within the Medline and the Embase databases was conducted with the following search terms: adverse events, bacteriuria, BCG, bladder cancer, cystitis, infection, pyuria, side effects and urinary tract infection (UTI). Sixteen relevant original articles were identified, including 6 articles directly presenting the safety or efficacy of BCG therapy in patients with ABU. None of them was a randomized controlled trial. Intravesical BCG instillations in patients with ABU were not associated with the increased risk of symptomatic UTI and did not affect negatively the recurrence- or progression-free survival. Routine urine analysis before BCG instillation created increased cost and potentially unnecessary delays in BCG therapy. ABU does not affect negatively the safety and efficacy of intravesical BCG immunotherapy. There is no evidence to support routine screening and treatment of ABU in patients scheduled for intravesical BCG instillations due to bladder cancer. However, this issue was not addressed adequately and needs further research.

Adjuvant intravesical immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is a standard treatment in patients with high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after the surgery. It reduces the risk of disease recurrence, delays progression and improves overall survival [1,2]. However, the therapy is associated with significant risk of local and systemic adverse events [3]. As the urinary tract infection (UTI) is regarded a risk factor of BCG complications, symptomatic UTI is an absolute contraindication to the therapy [1].

Although widely accepted, the association between UTI and the safety of BCG therapy was poorly studied and the evidence in this field is limited. Simultaneously, many urologists consider sterile urine as a sine-qua-non condition for intravesical BCG instillation [4]. Some experts believe that bacterial cystitis causes traumatization of the barrier for the BCG to reach the bloodstream [5]. However, the antimicrobial treatment delays adjuvant oncological treatment and potentially contributes to the increase in bacterial resistance to antibiotics, while the clinical benefit is not clear. Clinical safety and efficacy of the treatment are particularly interesting to observe in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU), a common condition in male patients in their sixth and seventh decades of life. A majority of them have benign prostate hyperplasia and urinary retention; all of them undergo transurethral procedures for bladder cancer (cystoscopy, resection). Consequently, they have at least few important risk factors of bacteriuria, which is reported in 28-54% of patients with benign prostate hyperplasia, 17% of patients undergoing cystoscopy and 2-39% of patients after the transurethral resection of the bladder tumour [6,7,8]. Simultaneously, positive urine culture in otherwise asymptomatic patients seems to be one of the most common reasons for the delay of the BCG immunotherapy, what - in turn - probably reduces the clinical efficacy of the treatment [9].

The aim of this systematic review was to present available evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of intravesical BCG instillations in patients with ABU.

Evidence Acquisition

To address the aim of this review, authors asked the following 4 clinical questions:

1. Does ABU increase the risk of febrile UTI or other complications in patients undergoing BCG intravesical instillations?

2. Does ABU affect the efficacy of BCG intravesical instillations?

3. Is it justified to screen asymptomatic patients for bacteriuria before BCG therapy?

4. Is it possible to reduce the risk of UTI related to BCG intravesical instillation?

A literature search within the Medline and the Embase databases was conducted in December 2016 for papers presenting the safety or efficacy of intravesical BCG immunotherapy in patients with ABU. The following search terms were used: adverse events, BCG, bacteriuria, bladder cancer, cystitis, infection, pyuria, side effects and UTI. The search was limited to publications in English, French and Spanish with no additional filters.

Sixteen relevant original articles were identified (Fig. 1). Full texts of all of them were retrieved. Among them, 6 articles related directly to the relationship between ABU and the safety or efficacy of BCG therapy; 3 discussed pyuria as a prognostic factor, 1 was focused on the response to BCG and 6 presented side effects of BCG therapy and their management.

Fig. 1

The flow of information through the different phases of the systematic review (adopted from www.prisma-statement.org).

Fig. 1

The flow of information through the different phases of the systematic review (adopted from www.prisma-statement.org).

Close modal

Evidence Synthesis

Does ABU Increase the Risk of Febrile UTI or Other Complications in Patients Undergoing BCG Intravesical Instillations?

The observational studies published by Herr [6,10,11,12] assessed the safety of BCG intravesical instillations in patients with ABU. The results of these studies are presented in Table 1. The risk of febrile UTI did not differ between patients with ABU and sterile urine in 2 studies and surprisingly favoured ABU in one study. Lower risk of UTI in patients with ABU was subsequently explained by the intense immune response to intravesical BCG instillations and its antimicrobial activity. In another study by Herr [13], among patients with bladder cancer and ABU, who did not receive antibiotics, positive urine culture during the follow-up was 2.4-fold less likely when BCG therapy was applied. In all cases of febrile UTI, symptoms resolved with culture-directed antibiotics and only 1 patient from all 4 reports required hospitalization.

Table 1

The overview of available evidence on the risk of febrile UTI in patients undergoing intravesical BCG instillations with ABU and sterile urine

The overview of available evidence on the risk of febrile UTI in patients undergoing intravesical BCG instillations with ABU and sterile urine
The overview of available evidence on the risk of febrile UTI in patients undergoing intravesical BCG instillations with ABU and sterile urine

Contrary to the above-mentioned studies, Perez-Jacoiste Asin et al. [14] noticed that systemic complications of BCG therapy were more likely in patients who underwent manipulations within the lower urinary tract, including transurethral fulguration, intravesical chemotherapy instillation, or radiotherapy. As all these interventions share with bacteriuria the disruption of bladder mucosa, one can suggest that ABU would also increase the risk of systemic complications. However, this was not tested within the study.

Does ABU Affect the Efficacy of BCG Intravesical Instillations?

Table 2 presents the results of observational studies assessing the efficacy of BCG intravesical instillations in patients with ABU. Both these studies showed that ABU does not increase the risk of bladder cancer recurrence and progression, while one study presented a lower recurrence rate and longer time to recurrence in patients with ABU than in patients with sterile urine [11,15]. This phenomenon could be potentially explained by the intense immunological response, triggered not only by BCG, but also by ABU [15]. Finally, leukocytes, recruited and migrated into the bladder during the immunological response to BCG [16], were postulated to predict the recurrence-free survival [17,18]. However, the URO-BCG-4 study did not confirm these findings [19].

Table 2

The overview of available evidence on the survival of patients undergoing intravesical BCG instillations with ABU and sterile urine

The overview of available evidence on the survival of patients undergoing intravesical BCG instillations with ABU and sterile urine
The overview of available evidence on the survival of patients undergoing intravesical BCG instillations with ABU and sterile urine

Is It Justified to Screen Asymptomatic Patients for Bacteriuria before BCG Therapy?

The rationale for routine screening for bacteriuria in asymptomatic patients undergoing BCG intravesical instillations was addressed by Zhao et al. [20] in a retrospective analysis. They found that the risk of UTI is equal in patients who are screened and who are not screened for ABU and reaches 3% in both groups after BCG instillations. The urine culture was positive in 18% of cases in the screening group and its positive predictive value for UTI was 0.9%. Moreover, BCG therapy was delayed in 2.5% of patients from the screening group due to additional treatment. Authors concluded that routine urine analysis before BCG instillation creates increased cost, potentially unnecessary delays in BCG therapy and can safely be omitted in asymptomatic patients.

Is It Possible to Reduce the Risk of UTI Related to BCG Intravesical Instillation?

It was postulated that the risk of UTI related to BCG instillation could be decreased with the use of fluoroquinolones after the intravesical instillation. In the prospective randomized controlled trial published by Colombel et al. [21], 2 doses of ofloxacin decreased the rate of moderate and severe adverse events by 18.5%, both local and systemic. Similar findings for 3 doses of prulifloxacin were reported by Damiano et al. [22] in another randomized controlled trail. Unfortunately, none of the studies presented detailed data on the incidence of UTI, while the rate of dysuria after BCG instillations was similar in patients receiving and not receiving antibiotics. On the contrary, the EORTC study did not find any benefit in the prophylactic use of isoniazid at the time of BCG instillation in terms of the risk of bacterial cystitis [23]. Finally, the optimal timing of possible antibiotic administration also remains unclear, although it probably should be delayed to avoid the possible inhibition of antitumor efficacy by the eradication of living BCG organisms [24].

We present a short review of the available literature in the field of intravesical BCG immunotherapy in patients with bacteriuria. Existing evidence suggest that there is no need for routine urine culture in asymptomatic patients, as BCG instillations in patients with ABU are as safe and effective as in patients with sterile urine. Moreover, antibacterial properties of intravesical BCG installations were proposed.

The main limitations of clinical conclusions are the low number and the observational character of almost all available studies, as well as the fact that a majority of the studies were conducted by the same researcher. This means they are all single-institution studies based on the experience of a single surgeon. Moreover, these articles come from one high-volume tertiary centre, where the patients were treated by an extremely experienced urologist. Interestingly, in the studies involving patients with ABU, the overall rate of febrile UTI after BCG instillations was very low, potentially leading to the underpowered results. In the historical study concerning the adverse events of BCG instillations during the maintenance therapy, van der Meijden et al. [25] noticed bacterial cystitis in 26% of patients during the follow-up with weekly urine culture. More recently, Brausi et al. [3] in the EORTC study noticed bacterial cystitis in 23% of patients receiving maintenance BCG therapy. Finally, the criterion of febrile UTI and positive urine culture was the end point in all the studies, while nonfebrile UTIs were not considered.

ABU does not increase the risk of infective complications of BCG intravesical instillations and does not affect negatively the efficacy of BCG therapy. By consequence, available evidence does not support the need for routine screening and treatment of ABU in patients with bladder cancer who are scheduled for intravescial BCG instillations. However, this issue is not addressed adequately and needs further research, including dedicated randomized controlled trails. Symptomatic UTI remains an absolute contraindication for BCG therapy.

1.
Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, et al: EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-461.
2.
Novotny V, Froehner M, Ollig J, Koch R, Zastrow S, Wirth MP: Impact of adjuvant intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment on patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer. Urol Int 2016;96:136-141.
3.
Brausi M, Oddens J, Sylvester R, Bono A, van de Beek C, van Andel G, et al: Side effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the bladder: results of the EORTC genito-urinary cancers group randomised phase 3 study comparing one-third dose with full dose and 1 year with 3 years of maintenance BCG. Eur Urol 2014;65:69-76.
4.
Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ, et al: Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 2008;179:1379-1390.
5.
Decaestecker K, Oosterlinck W: Managing the adverse events of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. Res Rep Urol 2015;7:157-163.
6.
Herr HW: Outpatient urological procedures in antibiotic-naive patients with bladder cancer with asymptomatic bacteriuria. BJU Int 2012;110(11 pt B):E658-E660.
7.
Heyns CF: Urinary tract infection associated with conditions causing urinary tract obstruction and stasis, excluding urolithiasis and neuropathic bladder. World J Urol 2012;30:77-83.
8.
Traxer O, Pasqui F, Gattegno B, Pearle MS: Technique and complications of transurethral surgery for bladder tumours. BJU Int 2004;94:492-496.
9.
Rentsch CA, Biot C, Gsponer JR, Bachmann A, Albert ML, Breban R: BCG-mediated bladder cancer immunotherapy: identifying determinants of treatment response using a calibrated mathematical model. PLoS One 2013;8:e56327.
10.
Herr HW: Intravesical bacille Calmette-Guerin in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria. JAMA 2011;305:1413-1414.
11.
Herr HW: Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin outcomes in patients with bladder cancer and asymptomatic bacteriuria. J Urol 2012;187:435-437.
12.
Herr HW: Cystoscopy and intravesical bacille Calmette-Guerin therapy in antibiotic-naïve patients with bladder cancer with asymptomatic bacteriuria: an update. Arab J Urol 2016;14:75-77.
13.
Herr HW: Intravesical bacille Calmette-Guerin eradicates bacteriuria in antibiotic-naïve bladder cancer patients. Eur Urol 2013;63:832-835.
14.
Perez-Jacoiste Asin MA, Fernandez-Ruiz M, Lopez-Medrano F, Lumbreras C, Tejido A, San Juan R, et al: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) infection following intravesical BCG administration as adjunctive therapy for bladder cancer: incidence, risk factors, and outcome in a single-institution series and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93:236-254.
15.
Herr H, Donat SM: Commentary: does asymptomatic bacteriuria reduce the risk of recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors? Urology 2016;98:1-3.
16.
Vita F, Siracusano S, Abbate R, Ciciliato S, Borelli V, Soranzo MR, et al: BCG prophylaxis in bladder cancer produces activation of recruited neutrophils. Can J Urol 2011;18:5517-5523.
17.
Saint F, Irani J, Salomon L, Legrand P, Abbou CC, Chopin D: [Urinary leukocytes as a new prognostic marker of therapeutic response and of adverse effects associated with the maintenance treatment with endovesical BCG, for the prophylaxis of superficial bladder tumors]. Prog Urol 2001;11:1242-1250.
18.
Saint F, Patard JJ, Irani J, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Legrand P, et al: Leukocyturia as a predictor of tolerance and efficacy of intravesical BCG maintenance therapy for superficial bladder cancer. Urology 2001;57:617-621; discussion 621-622.
19.
Pfister C, Kerkeni W, Rigaud J, Le Gal S, Saint F, Colombel M, et al: Efficacy and tolerance of one-third full dose bacillus Calmette-Guerin maintenance therapy every 3 months or 6 months: two-year results of URO-BCG-4 multicenter study. Int J Urol 2015;22:53-60.
20.
Zhao LC, Meeks JJ, Helfand BT, Ross FR, Herr HW, Kundu SD: Screening urine analysis before bacille Calmette-Guerin instillation does not reduce the rate of infectious complications. BJU Int 2012;109:1819-1821.
21.
Colombel M, Saint F, Chopin D, Malavaud B, Nicolas L, Rischmann P: The effect of ofloxacin on bacillus Calmette-Guerin induced toxicity in patients with superficial bladder cancer: results of a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter study. J Urol 2006;176:935-939.
22.
Damiano R, De Sio M, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, Perdona S, Palumbo IM, et al: Short-term administration of prulifloxacin in patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: an effective option for the prevention of bacillus Calmette-Guerin-induced toxicity? BJU Int 2009;104:633-639.
23.
Vegt PD, van der Meijden AP, Sylvester R, Brausi M, Höltl W, de Balincourt C: Does isoniazid reduce side effects of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy in superficial bladder cancer? Interim results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol 30911. J Urol 1997;157:1246-1249.
24.
van der Meijden PM, van Klingeren B, Steerenberg PA, de Boer LC, de Jong WH, Debruyne FM: The possible influence of antibiotics on results of bacillus Calmette-Guerin intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 1991;146:444-446.
25.
van der Meijden AP, Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, Hoeltl W, Bono AV; EORTC Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group: Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Ta T1 bladder tumors is not associated with increased toxicity: results from a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Group Phase III Trial. Eur Urol 2003;44:429-434.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.