Objectives: Urinary incontinence is a hygienic and socially distressing problem for affected people and causes high healthcare costs. Objective standardized noninvasive quantification of urinary incontinence is highly important and, in addition, enables control of therapeutic efficacy. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility of a standardized 20-min pad test to measure urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy in comparison to the 1-hour pad-weighing test recommended by the International Continence Society (ICS). Methods: We applied a standardized questionnaire, the ICS 1-hour pad test and a simplified 20-min pad test to evaluate subjective and objective post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence in 56 men. Results: The technical feasibility of the 20-min pad test was excellent; the results correlated significantly with both the self-assessment via questionnaire (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the 1-hour pad test (ICS; r = 0.66; p < 0.001). Moreover, it was highly reliable (r = 0.74; p < 0.0005) with excellent patient acceptance. Conclusions: The 20-min pad test qualified as a reliable, cost-effective and noninvasive tool which can easily be applied in urologic or physiotherapeutic practice to assess post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence and to evaluate the success of therapeutic approaches.

Keywords:
Urinary incontinence, Pad test, accuracy, reliability, Radical prostatectomy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.