Introduction: Outpatient transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) is not widespread, involving only 5% of patients. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of TURBT in an outpatient setting and to evaluate factors possibly associated with conversion to inpatient care. Methods: All consecutive outpatient-TURBT performed between January 2016 and December 2022 in one academic center was retrospectively analyzed. Outpatient success was defined as the absence of conversion to conventional hospitalization as well as the absence of unscheduled care within 30 postoperative days. The quality of the resection was assessed by the presence of detrusor muscle in the surgical specimen. Results: A total of 500 consecutive outpatient-TURBT were included in 376 patients. Outpatient-TURBT was performed for primary tumor diagnosis in 187 (37%) cases, second look in 66 (13%) cases and tumor relapse in 216 (43%) cases. Muscle was present in 86% of cases. Perioperative inpatient conversions occurred in 40 cases (8%). Once converted, patients stayed a median of 2 days IQR (1;3). Seventy-seven post-TURBT unscheduled care were observed (15%) with 40 emergency room visits (8%) and/or 22 rehospitalizations (4%), occurring on a median postoperative day 3 IQR (1; 4). Overall complication rate was 11% (51 cases of grade 1 and 2 complications [10%] and 6 cases of grade 3 complications [1%]). Multivariate predictors of outpatient-TURBT failure were specimen weight ≥1 g (OR = 4.35, 95% CI: 1.60–13.3, p = 0.007), surgery duration (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.06–1.71), p = 0.002) and antiplatelet treatment (OR = 2.86, 95% CI: 0.864–9.17, p = 0.077). Conclusion: Outpatient TURBT appears to be acceptable with an 8% conversion rate, as well as safe, with an 11% complication rate. Quality of the resection was not affected by the outpatient setting. Tumor weight ≥1 g, surgery duration and absence of antiplatelet treatment were significant multivariate predictors of outpatient surgery failure.

1.
Burger
M
,
Catto
JW
,
Dalbagni
G
,
Grossman
HB
,
Herr
H
,
Karakiewicz
P
, et al
.
Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer
.
Eur Urol
.
2013
;
63
(
2
):
234
41
.
2.
Babjuk
M
,
Burger
M
,
Capoun
O
,
Cohen
D
,
Compérat
EM
,
Dominguez Escrig
JL
, et al
.
European association of urology guidelines on non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and carcinoma in situ)
.
Eur Urol
.
2022
;
81
(
1
):
75
94
.
3.
Bailey
CR
,
Ahuja
M
,
Bartholomew
K
,
Bew
S
,
Forbes
L
,
Lipp
A
, et al
.
Guidelines for day‐case surgery 2019: guidelines from the association of anaesthetists and the British association of day surgery
.
Anaesthesia
.
2019
;
74
(
6
):
778
92
.
4.
Phull
M
,
Begum
H
,
John
JB
,
van Hove
M
,
McGrath
J
,
O’Flynn
K
, et al
.
Potential carbon savings with day-case compared to inpatient transurethral resection of bladder tumour surgery in england: a retrospective observational study using administrative data
.
Eur Urol Open Sci
.
2023
;
52
:
44
50
.
5.
Audenet
F
,
Cornu
JN
,
Maillet
M
,
Lukacs
B
,
Sèbe
P
,
Peyrat
L
, et al
.
Évaluation de la pratique de la chirurgie ambulatoire en urologie: expérience d’un centre
.
Prog Urol
.
2011
;
21
(
5
):
354
9
.
6.
Sylvester
RJ
,
Oosterlinck
W
,
Holmang
S
,
Sydes
MR
,
Birtle
A
,
Gudjonsson
S
, et al
.
Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a single immediate instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection with transurethral resection alone in patients with stage pTa–pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: which patients benefit from the instillation
.
Eur Urol
.
2016
;
69
(
2
):
231
44
.
7.
Lenis
AT
,
Asanad
K
,
Blaibel
M
,
Donin
NM
,
Chamie
K
.
Continuous saline bladder irrigation for two hours following transurethral resection of bladder tumors in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer does not prevent recurrence or progression compared with intravesical Mitomycin-C
.
BMC Urol
.
2018
;
18
(
1
):
93
.
8.
Kockelbergh
R
.
Transurethral resection of bladder tumour: is day‐case surgery appropriate
.
BJU Int
.
2005
;
96
(
6
):
746
7
.
9.
Neuzillet
Y
,
Pradère
B
,
Xylinas
E
,
Allory
Y
,
Audenet
F
,
Loriot
Y
, et al
.
French AFU cancer committee guidelines - update 2022-2024: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)
.
Prog Urol
.
2022
;
32
(
15
):
1102
40
.
10.
Godier
A
,
Fontana
P
,
Motte
S
,
Steib
A
,
Bonhomme
F
,
Schlumberger
S
, et al
.
Gestion des agents antiplaquettaires pour une procédure invasive programmée. Propositions du Groupe d’intérêt en hémostase périopératoire (GIHP) et du Groupe français d’études sur l’hémostase et la thrombose (GFHT) en collaboration avec la Société française d’anesthésie-réanimation (SFAR)
.
Anesthésie & Réanimation
.
2018
;
4
(
6
):
548
62
.
11.
Albaladejo
P
.
Prévention de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse péri-opératoire-SFAR-2024
.
2024
.
12.
Mezei
G
,
Chung
F
.
Return hospital visits and hospital readmissions after ambulatory surgery
.
Ann Surg
.
1999
;
230
(
5
):
721
7
.
13.
Sankar
A
,
Johnson
SR
,
Beattie
WS
,
Tait
G
,
Wijeysundera
DN
.
Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice
.
Br J Anaesth
.
2014
;
113
(
3
):
424
32
.
14.
Charlson
ME
,
Pompei
P
,
Ales
KL
,
MacKenzie
CR
.
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
.
J Chronic Dis
.
1987
;
40
(
5
):
373
83
.
15.
Sylvester
RJ
,
Rodríguez
O
,
Hernández
V
,
Turturica
D
,
Bauerová
L
,
Bruins
HM
, et al
.
European association of urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 classification systems for grade: an update from the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel
.
Eur Urol
.
2021
;
79
(
4
):
480
8
.
16.
Mitropoulos
D
,
Artibani
W
,
Graefen
M
,
Remzi
M
,
Rouprêt
M
,
Truss
M
.
Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations
.
Eur Urol
.
2013
;
37
(
1
):
341
11
.
17.
Malde
S
,
Grover
S
,
Raj
S
,
Yuan
C
,
Nair
R
,
Thurairaja
R
, et al
.
A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of outpatient bladder tumour ablation
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2022
;
8
(
1
):
141
51
.
18.
Ippoliti
S
,
Bhatt
NR
,
Ilie
CP
.
Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) as a day-case: a real-world practice and patients’ perspective from a district general hospital (DGH)
.
Urologia
.
2023
;
90
(
1
):
68
74
.
19.
Austin
T
,
Robinson
R
,
Wilby
D
,
Hall
S
,
Hodgson
D
.
Day case primary trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) as standard in a single UK centre. Should this be the new norm
.
J Clin Urol
.
2020
;
13
(
4
):
273
8
.
20.
Gray
WK
,
Day
J
,
Briggs
TW
,
Harrison
S
.
Transurethral resection of bladder tumour as day-case surgery: evidence of effectiveness from the UK Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) programme
.
J Clin Urol
.
2020
;
13
(
3
):
221
7
.
21.
Bansal
A
,
Sankhwar
S
,
Goel
A
,
Kumar
M
,
Purkait
B
,
Aeron
R
.
Grading of complications of transurethral resection of bladder tumor using Clavien-Dindo classification system
.
Indian J Urol
.
2016
;
32
(
3
):
232
7
.
22.
Cuvelier
G
,
Legrand
G
,
Vignes
B
,
Lechevallier
É
,
Rébillard
X
,
Coloby
P
.
Recommandations AFU/SFAR/AFCA/ANAP Chirurgie ambulatoire en urologie
;
2013
. Vol.
23
; p.
69
.
23.
Osman
Y
,
Elawdy
M
,
Taha
DE
,
Zahran
MH
,
Abouelkheir
RT
,
Sharaf
DE
, et al
.
Bladder perforation as a complication of transurethral resection of bladder tumors: the predictors, management, and its impact in a series of 1570 at a tertiary urology institute
.
Int Urol Nephrol
.
2023
;
55
(
9
):
2161
7
.
24.
Maltagliati
M
,
Varca
V
,
Milandri
R
,
Micali
S
,
Bocchialini
T
,
Rocco
BMC
, et al
.
Second-look TURBT: evaluation of anatomopatological and oncologic results in a single center
.
Acta Biomed
.
2020
;
91
(
2
):
322
5
.
25.
Volz
Y
,
Trappmann
R
,
Ebner
B
,
Eismann
L
,
Pyrgidis
N
,
Pfitzinger
P
, et al
.
Absence of detrusor muscle in TUR-BT specimen – can we predict who is at highest risk
.
BMC Urol
.
2023
;
23
(
1
):
106
.
26.
Bebane
S
,
Denize
J
,
Goujon
A
,
Meria
P
,
Verine
J
,
Mongiat-Artus
P
, et al
.
Perioperative outcomes of transurethral resection for t1 bladder tumors: quality evaluation based on patient, tumor and surgeon criteria
.
World J Urol
.
2021
;
39
(
11
):
4159
65
.
You do not currently have access to this content.