Background: We aimed to confirm the advantages of a modified hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (HARPLDN) compared to the performance of standard retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (RPLDN). Methods: One hundred twenty-eight consecutive surgical cases were categorized into 2 groups, one receiving standard RPLDN (group 1) and one receiving modified HARPLDN (group 2). Perioperative factors of both groups were evaluated retrospectively, including donors' demographics, overall operating time, warm ischemia time (WIT), graft vessel length, blood loss, complications, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, hospital stay, and matched recipients' perioperative outcomes. One-year follow-up data were also examined. Results: The standard RPLDN group (n = 44) and modified HARPLDN group (n = 84) had comparable age, gender, and body mass index. The RPLDN group donors had longer operative time, shorter vein length and longer WIT than the modified HARPLDN (all p < 0.001). RPLDN had higher VAS scores (p < 0.001), longer carminative time (p = 0.002) and higher morphine requirement (p = 0.039) than the modified HARPLDN. No complications occurred in either group. All recipients and grafts had survived at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The modified HARPLDN technique is safe and effective for living donor nephrectomy and has shorter operating time, shorter WIT and better pain control. Further study is required to evaluate donors' long-term quality of life and recipients' long-term outcomes.

Hofker HS, Nijboer WN, Niesing J, Krikke C, Seelen MA, van Son WJ, van Wijhe M, Groen H, Vd Heide JJ, Ploeg RJ: A randomized clinical trial of living donor nephrectomy: a plea for a differentiated appraisal of mini-open muscle splitting incision and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2012;25:976-986.
Lentine KL, Patel A: Risks and outcomes of living donation. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2012;19:220-228.
Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995;60:1047-1049.
Yuan H, Liu L, Zheng S, Yang L, Pu C, Wei Q, Han P: The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 2013;45:65-76.
Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA: Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;11:CD006124.
Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, Knipscheer BC, Hazebroek EJ, Dooper IM, Weimar W, Hop WC, Adang EM, van der Wilt GJ, Bonjer HJ, van der Vliet JA, IJzermans JN: Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2006;333:221.
Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Oyen O, Edwin B, Digernes R, Kvarstein G, Tønnessen TI, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, Fosse E: Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors-laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study. Am J Transplant 2006;6:1438-1443.
Capolicchio JP, Feifer A, Plante MK, Tchervenkov J: Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: initial experience with a unique hand-assisted approach. Clin Transplant 2011;25:352-359.
Dols LF, Kok NF, d'Ancona FC, Klop KW, Tran TC, Langenhuijsen JF, Terkivatan T, Dor FJ, Weimar W, Dooper IM, Ijzermans JN: Randomized controlled trial comparing hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2014;97:161-167.
Klop KW, Kok NF, Dols LF, Dor FJ, Tran KT, Terkivatan T, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN: Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study. Transpl Int 2014;27:162-169.
Gjertsen H, Sandberg AK, Wadström J, Tydén G, Ericzon BG: Introduction of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge. Transplant Proc 2006;38:2644-2645.
Yagisawa T, Sakuma Y, Fujiwara T, Nagai H, Yashi M, Terauchi M: Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a safe and minimally invasive procedure for the donor. Transplant Proc 2005;37:617-619.
Hoznek A, Olsson LE, Salomon L, Saint F, Cicco A, Chopin D, Abbou CC: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Preliminary results. Eur Urol 2001;40:614-618.
Tanabe K, Miyamoto N, Ishida H, Tokumoto T, Shirakawa H, Yamamoto H, Kondo T, Okuda H, Shimmura H, Ishikawa N, Nozaki T, Toma H: Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN): establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center. Am J Transplant 2005;5(4 pt 1):739-745.
Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 2004;171:47-51.
Friedman AL, Peters TG, Ratner LE: Regulatory failure contributing to deaths of live kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2012;12:829-834.
Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, Boulware LE, Ratner LE: Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation. Ann Surg 2006;243:126-130.
Wadström J: Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation 2005;80:1060-1066.
Wadström J, Martin AL, Estok R, Mercaldi CJ, Stifelman MD: Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopy versus open and laparoscopic techniques in urology procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2011;25:1095-1104.
Pareek G, Hedican SP, Gee JR, Bruskewitz RC, Nakada SY: Meta-analysis of the complications of laparoscopic renal surgery: comparison of procedures and techniques. J Urol 2006;175:1208-1213.
Troppmann C, Daily MF, McVicar JP, Troppmann KM, Perez RV: The transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a matched pair pilot study. Transplantation 2010;89:858-863.
Bachmann A, Wyler S, Wolff T, Gürke L, Steiger J, Kettelhack C, Gasser TC, Ruszat R: Complications of retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: single center experience after 164 cases. World J Urol 2008;26:549-554.
Capolicchio JP, Saemi A, Trotter S, Plante MK: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with a modified hand-assisted approach. Urology 2011;77:607-611.
Iwai T, Uchida J, Kuwabara N, Kabei K, Yukimatsu N, Okamura M, Yamasaki T, Naganuma T, Kumada N, Nakatani T: Clinical outcome of elderly kidney transplant recipients from spousal donors. Urol Int 2015;95:99-105.
Arai K, Nishiyama T, Hara N, Kasahara T, Saito K, Takahashi K: Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy with a gel-sealed hand-assist access device. BMC Urol 2013;13:7.
Berends FJ, den Hoed PT, Bonjer HJ, Kazemier G, van Riemsdijk I, Weimar W, IJzermans JN: Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:893-898.
Fuller TF: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: making optimal use of donors without doing harm. Transplantation 2014;98:1144.
Kuang W, Ng CS, Matin S, Kaouk JH, El-Jack M, Gill IS: Rhabdomyolysis after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2002;60:911.
Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, Bellman GC, Stoller ML: Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology 2002;60:415-419; discussion 419-420.
Ponsky L, Cherullo E, Moinzadeh A, Desai M, Kaouk J, Haber GP, Chen D, Ng C, Fuchs G, Singh D, Finelli A, Frank I, Matin S: The Hem-o-Lok Clip is safe for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a multi-institutional review. Urology 2008;71:593-596.
Simforoosh N, Sarhangnejad R, Basiri A, Ziaee SA, Sharifiaghdas F, Tabibi A, Nouralizadeh A, Kashi AH, Moosanejad N: Vascular clips are safe and a great cost-effective technique for arterial and venous control in laparoscopic nephrectomy: single-center experience with 1834 laparoscopic nephrectomies. J Endourol 2012;26:1009-1012.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.