Aims: To identify subgroups of patients with renal stones ≥20 mm that are more suitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy. Methods: A total of 376 patients with renal stones ≥20 mm underwent monotherapy with ESWL. The treatment outcome was evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. A stone-free status or fragmentation of stones to 4 mm or smaller was considered efficacious. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the overall stone-free rate was 64.4%, and the efficacy rate was 70.7%. The efficacy rate was 89.4% for patients with a residual stone surface area ≤50% of baseline after the first ESWL, while the efficacy rate was 32.4% for other patients. The efficacy was 92.2% for stones ≤400 mm2 and those with lower radiodensity, as determined by a plain (KUB) film. Conclusions: For renal stones with a surface area ≤400 mm2 and a radiodensity equal to or less than that of the 12th rib as determined by a KUB film, ESWL may be considered the first line of treatment, even for stones with a diameter ≥20 mm. For large stones requiring repeat treatments, the surface area of the residual stones after the first ESWL is a predictor of the final treatment result.

1.
Portis AJ, Sundaram CP: Diagnosis and initial management of kidney stones. Am Fam Physician 2001;63:1329-1338.
2.
Torricelli FC, Danilovic A, Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Srougi M, Mazzucchi E: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2015;61:65-71.
3.
Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M; Working Party on Lithiasis, European Association of Urology: Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2001;40:362-371.
4.
Shouman AM, Ziada AM, Ghoneim IA, Morsi HA: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal stones >25 mm in children. Urology 2009;74:109-111.
5.
Srivastava A, Chipde SS: Management of 1-2 cm renal stones. Indian J Urol 2013;29:195-199.
6.
Matlaga BR; American Board of Urology: Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol 2009;181:2152-2156.
7.
Smith AD: Shock-wave treatment of renal calculi; in Preminger G, Badlani G, Kavoussi LR: Smith's Textbook of Endourology, ed 3. Chichester, Wiley, 2012, pp 576-597.
8.
Tiselius HG, Andersson A: Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol 2003;43:275-281.
9.
Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M, Knoll T: European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on urolithiasis. Pairs, EAU Guidelines, Edition Presented at the 21st EAU Annual Congress, 2006.
10.
Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, Lianos E, Mavromanolakis E: Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J Endourol 2003;17:201-205.
11.
Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Panagopoulos G, Bruno JJ, Fracchia JA: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and hounsfield units. Urology 2005;65:33-36.
12.
Ng CF, Siu DY, Wong A, Goggins W, Chan ES, Wong KT: Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2009;181:1151-1157.
13.
Dede O, Sener NC, Bas O, Dede G, Bağbanci MS: Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones? Turk J Urol 2015;41:20-23.
14.
El-Assmy A, El-Nahas AR, Abo-Elghar ME, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, Sheir KZ: Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20-30 mm: a multivariate analysis model. ScientificWorldJournal 2006;6:2388-2395.
15.
Koko AK, Onuora VC, Al Turki MA, Mesbed AH, Al Jawini NA: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy is not adequate for management of staghorn renal calculi. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2003;14:487-491.
16.
Irani D, Eshratkhah R, Amin-Sharifi A: Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy in complex urolithiasis in the era of advanced endourologic procedures. Urol J 2005;2:13-19.
17.
El-Assmy A, El-Nahas AR, Madbouly K, Abdel-Khalek M, Abo-Elghar ME, Sheir KZ: Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy monotherapy of partial staghorn calculi. Prognostic factors and long-term results. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2006;40:320-325.
18.
Talas H, Kilic O, Tangal S, Safak M: Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis? Urol Int 2007;79:129-132.
19.
Ng CF, Wong A, Tolley DA: A single-center experience of the usefulness of caliceal-pelvic height in three different lithotripters. J Endourol 2008;22:1409-1415.
20.
Leykamm L, Tiselius HG: Observations on intrarenal geometry of the lower-caliceal system in relation to clearance of stone fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 2007;21:386-392.
21.
Madaan S, Joyce AD: Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:109-113.
22.
Paterson RF, Lifshitz DA, Kuo RL, Siqueira TM Jr, Lingeman JE: Shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal calculi. Int Braz J Urol 2002;28:291-301.
23.
Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W: Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 2001;58:170-173.
24.
Lim KH, Jung JH, Kwon JH, Lee YS, Bae J, Cho MC, Lee KS, Lee HW: Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Korean J Urol 2015;56:56-62.
25.
Krishnamurthy MS, Ferucci PG, Sankey N, Chandhoke PS: Is stone radiodensity a useful parameter for predicting outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones < or = 2 cm? Int Braz J Urol 2005;31:3-8; discussion 9.
26.
Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;11:CD007044.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.