Background: The Productive Operating Theatre (TPOT) is a theatre improvement programme designed by the UK National Health Service. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of TPOT in urology operating theatres and identify obstacles to running an ideal operating list. Method: TPOT was introduced in two urology operating theatres in September 2010. A multidisciplinary team identified and audited obstacles to the running of an ideal operating list. A brief/debrief system was introduced and patient satisfaction was recorded via a structured questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was the effect of TPOT on start and overrun times. Results: Start times: 39-41% increase in operating lists starting on time from September 2010 to June 2011, involving 1,365 cases. Overrun times: Declined by 832 min between March 2010 and March 2011. The cost of monthly overrun decreased from September 2010 to June 2011 by GBP 510-3,030. Patient experience: A high degree of satisfaction regarding level of care (77%), staff hygiene (71%) and information provided (72%), while negative comments regarding staff shortages and environment/facilities were recorded. Conclusions: TPOT has helped identify key obstacles and shown improvements in efficiency measures such as start/overrun times.

1.
Health Care Financial Management Association: Achieving operating room efficiency through process integration, technical report, 2005. http://www.mckesson.com/static_files/McKesson.com/MPT/Documents/HFMAProcessIntegration.pdf.
2.
Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, McDonald T: Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology 1995;83:1138-1144.
3.
Audit Commission: Operating theatres, review of national findings, 2003. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/nationalstudies/health/other/Pages/operatingtheatres.aspx#downloads.
4.
Audit Commission: Operating theatres, a bulletin for health bodies, 2002. http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/nationalstudies/health/other/Pages/operatingtheatresbulletin.aspx#downloads.
5.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement: The productive operating theatre. 2011. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_value/productivity_series/the_productive_operating_theatre.html.
6.
NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement: The productive operating theatre programme. 2009. http://www.evidence.nhs.uk/search?q=Productive+Operating+Theatre.
7.
Bethune R, Sasirekha G, Sahu A, Cawthorn S, Pullyblank A: Use of briefings and debriefings as a tool in improving team work, efficiency, and communication in the operating theatre. Postgrad Med J 2011;87:331-334.
8.
Nundy S, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB, et al: Impact of preoperative briefings on operating room delays: a preliminary report. Arch Surg 2008;143:1068-1072.
9.
Lacqua MJ, Evans JT: Cancelled elective surgery: an evaluation. Am Surg 1994;60:809-811.
10.
Schofield WN, Rubin GL, Piza M, et al: Cancellation of operations on the day of intended surgery at a major Australian referral hospital. Med J Aust 2005;182:612-615.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.