Introduction: We assessed the reproducibility and prognostic impact of the Broders' grading system (BGS) in a cohort of 147 patients with surgically treated penile squamous cell carcinomas. Materials and Methods: Conventionally stained histology slides were graded according to the BGS in two rounds by two study pathologists. Reproducibility was assessed using ĸ statistics. Multivariable analyses were calculated to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS). The ‘mean grade' per pathologist per round was calculated by allocating grade points to each study case (G1-G4: 1-4 points) and dividing the sum of all grade points by the number of cases examined. Results: The BGS showed substantial interobserver variation (59-87% with ĸ = 0.38-0.69) but almost perfect intraobserver reproducibility (91% with ĸ = 0.86 and 96% with ĸ = 0.94, respectively). The ‘mean grade' per pathologist remained nearly constant in both rounds of examination (differences ≤0.05 grade points) but differed between the two pathologists (up to 0.4 grade points). In multivariable analyses, the prognostic impact of the BGS in terms of CSS was strongly pathologist-dependent. Conclusions: Clinically and prognostically relevant interobserver discordance concerning the BGS seems, at least in part, to be attributable to inherent ‘aggressive' versus ‘reserved' grading characteristics of individual pathologists.

Keywords:
Penile squamous cell carcinoma, Broders’ grading system, Interobserver reproducibility, Prognostic evaluation
1.
Naumann CM, Alkatout I, Hamann MF, et al: Interobserver variation in grading and staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in relation to the clinical outcome. BJU Int 2009;103:1660-1665.
2.
Kattan MW, Ficarra V, Artibani W, et al; GUONE Penile Cancer Project Members: Nomogram predictive of cancer specific survival in patients undergoing partial or total amputation for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 2006;175:2103-2108.
3.
Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Artibani W, et al: Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 2006;175:1700-1704.
4.
Zhu Y, Zhang HL, Yao XD, et al: Development and evaluation of a nomogram to predict inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer and clinically negative lymph nodes. J Urol 2010;184:539-545.
5.
Thuret R, Sun M, Abdollah F, et al: Conditional survival predictions after surgery for patients with penile carcinoma. Cancer 2011;117:3723-3730.
6.
Zini L, Cloutier V, Isbarn H, et al: A simple and accurate model for prediction of cancer-specific mortality in patients treated with surgery for primary penile squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:1013-1018.
7.
Wittekind C, Meyer HJ (eds): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, ed 7. New York, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp 225-228.
8.
Pizzocaro G, Algaba F, Horenblas S, et al; European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Group on Penile Cancer: EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009. Eur Urol 2010;57:1002-1012.
9.
Thuret R, Sun M, Abdollah F, et al: Tumor grade improves the prognostic ability of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage in patients with penile carcinoma. J Urol 2011;185:501-507.
10.
Gunia S, Erbersdobler A, Hakenberg OW, et al: P16(INK4a) is a marker of good prognosis for primary invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 2012;187:899-907.
11.
Cubilla AL, Piris A, Pfannl R, et al: Anatomic levels: important landmarks in penectomy specimens: a detailed anatomic and histologic study based on examination of 44 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:1091-1094.
12.
Velazquez EF, Ayala G, Liu H, et al: Histologic grade and perineural invasion are more important than tumour thickness as predictor of nodal metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma invading 5 to 10mm. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:974-979.
13.
Broders AC: Squamous-cell epithelioma of the skin: a study of 256 cases. Ann Surg 1921;73:141-160.
14.
van Rhijn BW, van Leenders GJ, Ooms BC, et al: The pathologist's mean grade is constant and individualizes the prognostic value of bladder cancer grading. Eur Urol 2010;57:1052-1057.
15.
Harrell F, Lee K, Mark D. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361-387.
16.
DeLong E, DeLong D, Clarke-Pearson D: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845.
17.
Leijte JA, Kroon BK, Valdés Olmos RA, et al: Reliability and safety of current dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007;52:170-177.
18.
Akinde OR, Abudu AK, Anunobi CC, et al: Accuracy of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral lymph node enlargements. Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2011;21:59-63.
19.
Wu M, Chen H, Zheng X, et al: Evaluation of a scoring system for predicting lymph node malignancy in ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration practice. Diagn Cytopathol 2011, E-pub ahead of print.
20.
Rocha RM, Ignácio JA, Jordán J, et al: A clinical, pathologic, and molecular study of p53 and murine double minute 2 in penile carcinogenesis and its relation to prognosis. Hum Pathol 2011;43:481-488.
21.
Minardi D, d'Anzeo G, Lucarini G, et al: D2-40 immunoreactivity in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a marker of aggressiveness. Hum Pathol 2011;42:1596-1602.
22.
Gunia S, Kakies C, Erbersdobler A, et al: Expression of p53, p21 and cyclin D1 in penile cancer: p53 predicts poor prognosis. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:232-236.
23.
Muneer A, Kayes O, Ahmed HU, et al: Molecular prognostic factors in penile cancer. World J Urol 2009;27:1161-1167.
24.
Kronz JD, Silberman MA, Allsbrook WC: A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm. Cancer 2000;15:1818-1823.
25.
Velazquez EF, Amin MB, Epstein JI, et al; Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists: Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the penis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134:923-929.
26.
Chaux A, Torres J, Pfannl R, et al: Histologic grade in penile squamous cell carcinoma: visual estimation versus digital measurement of proportions of grades, adverse prognosis with any proportion of grade 3 and correlation of a Gleason-like system with nodal metastasis. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33:1042-1048.
27.
Cubilla AL, Lloveras B, Alejo M, et al: Value of p16(INK)4(a) in the pathology of invasive penile squamous cell carcinomas: a report of 202 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:253-261.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.