Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of sheaths to access the ureter has increased after the introduction of new digital ureterorenoscopes in patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy. Methods: 140 patients with kidney stones were randomised to be scoped with either an old-generation fibre-optic flexible ureteroscope (DUR-8, Elite, ACMI; distal tip diameter = 6.75 Fr) or a new-generation digital LCD flexible ureteroscope (Invisio D-URD flexible ureteroscope; distal tip diameter = 8.7 Fr). We recorded the necessity to use a sheath to access the ureter, sheath-related and postoperative complications, and whether or not a JJ stent was left behind. Results: 157 (80 fibre-optic and 77 digital) ureterorenoscopies were performed. Ureteral access sheaths were used significantly more frequently with digital scopes (p = 0.00174). Two patients in the digital scope group had a small distal ureteric perforation from the introducer sheath compared with none in the fibre-optic scope group. Conclusions: A statistically significant increase in sheath use was observed in the new-generation digital flexible ureteroscopy group. Despite the improvement in image quality, better durability and improved stone clearance, there are some potential drawbacks of these scopes. The increased distal tip diameter can result in increased use of ureteric access sheaths and this may increase morbidity and expense.

Keywords:
Flexible ureteroscopy, Digital, Fibre optic, Ureteric access sheath
1.
Andonian S, Okeke Z, Smith AD: Digital ureteroscopy: the next step. J Endourol 2008;22:603–606.
2.
Papatsoris A, Kachrilas S, El Howairis M, Masood J, Buchholz N: Novel technologies in flexible ureterorenoscopy. Arab J Urol 2011;9:41–46.
3.
Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, et al: Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol 2010;24:1929–1934.
4.
D’Addessi A, Bassi P: Ureterorenoscopy: avoiding and managing complications. Urol Int 2011;87:251–259.
5.
Paffen ML, Keizer JG, de Winter GV, Arends AJ, Hendrikx AJ: A comparison of the physical properties of four new-generation flexible ureteroscopes: (de)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics. J Endourol 2008;22:2227–2234.
6.
Wanajo I, Tomiyami Y, Tadachi M, Kobayashi M, Yamazaki Y, Kojima M, Shibata N: The potency of KUL-7211, a selective ureteral relaxant, in isolated canine ureter: comparison with various spasmolytics. Urol Res 2005;33:409–414.
7.
Takayasu H, Aso Y: Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for its introduction into the ureter. J Urol 1974;112:176–178.
8.
Monga M, Bhayani S, Landman J, Conradie M, Sundaram CP, Clayman RV: Ureteral access for upper urinary tract disease: the access sheath. J Endourol 2001;15:831–834.
9.
Delvecchio FC, Auge BK, Brizuela RM, et al: Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology 2003;61:518–522.
10.
Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM: Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urol 2001;165:789–793.
11.
Abrahams HM, Stoller ML: The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheaths. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:83–87.
12.
L’esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CDJ, et al: Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology 2005;66:252–255.
13.
Auge BK, Pietrow PK, Lallas CD, Raj GV, Santa-Cruz RW, Preminger GM: Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Endourol 2004;18:33–36.
14.
Vanlangendonck R, Landman J: Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:71–81.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.