Aim: We aimed to investigate the mechanisms of hepaCAM inactivation in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder through the analysis of hepaCAM exon 2 methylation. Methods: The methylation of hepaCAM exon 2 and the expression of hepaCAM were determined by methylation-specific restriction PCR assay and RT-PCR in bladder cancer cells (T24, BIU-87) as well as in 55 paired bladder cancer specimens. The methylated bladder cancer cells were treated with 5-Aza- 2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR), a demethylating agent. MTT was used to detect the proliferation of T24 and BIU-87 cells. Results: The proliferation of T24 and BIU-87 cells was suppressed by treatment with different concentrations of 5-Aza-CdR; the expression of hepaCAM was absent in T24 and BIU-87 cells, and we found that exon 2 of hepaCAM was methylated in the 2 cells. hepaCAM mRNA was re-expressed and the methylation status of hepaCAM exon 2 was reversed after treatment with 5-Aza-CdR. The expression of hepaCAM mRNA in bladder cancer tissues was significantly lower than that in adjacent tissues. The methylation rate of hepaCAM exon 2 was significantly higher in bladder cancer tissues than in adjacent tissues. The methylation of hepaCAM exon 2 was related to hepaCAM expression in bladder cancer tissues. Conclusions: Downregulation of hepaCAM expression plays an important role in the tumorigenesis and development of bladder cancer. DNA methylation may be important for downregulation of hepaCAM expression in bladder cancer.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.