Objective: We surveyed urologists in Austria, Germany and Switzerland regarding their standard approach to prostate biopsy. Methods: Participants of Austrian and German urological meetings were asked to fill out a survey form; additionally, this was mailed to all Swiss urologists. Results: 304 surveys are available for analysis. 97% of participants perform a biopsy if digital rectal examination is abnormal. 63% use 4 ng/ml PSA (prostate-specific antigen) as cut-off. Age-related reference ranges are used by 54%, free PSA by 57%. 22% use PSA density, 55% PSA velocity. Overall 61% require a written consent, with 85, 86 and 25% in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. 96% of the urologists prescribe a quinolone antibiotic with a wide range regarding the start and end of drug therapy. 77% offer some kind of anaesthesia. Periprostatic injection of a local anaesthetic drug is used by 36%, lidocaine gel by 27%. 91% perform the biopsies transrectally under ultrasound guidance. Digitally guided biopsies are used by 11%. Only 3 participants perform perineal biopsies. The mean number of cores per biopsy session is 9.2, the maximum number of cores is 15.3 as a mean. Participants will stop performing any further biopsies if the patient already had a mean of 3.5 biopsy sessions. Conclusions: The majority of urologists in Central Europe prescribe a quinolone antibiotic and recommend some type of analgesia. The majority has abandoned the sextant technique and increases the number of cores in the case of rebiopsy. Biopsies are stopped after a mean of 3.5 sessions.

Keywords:
Cancer detection, Prostate biopsy, Prostate cancer
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.