Background: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the serum levels of cathepsin D (Cath D) as a diagnostic tool in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in comparison with healthy volunteers. Methods: Cath D serum levels were measured in serum samples obtained preoperatively from 32 patients with histologically confirmed RCC versus 30 healthy individuals using an enzyme immunoassay. Additionally, for the tumor group, Cath D serum levels were correlated with tumor stage and grade as determined according to the 2002 TNM classification. Results: The serum Cath D concentration was not significantly different in patients with RCC compared with healthy individuals (mean 16.58 vs. 16.64 ng/ml; p = 0.43). Furthermore, there was no significant association between Cath D serum levels and several patient or tumor characteristics such as tumor stage, tumor grade, lymph node status, presence of metastasis, gender or age. Conclusions: In contrast to overexpression of Cath D in primary RCC tissue, serum Cath D is not altered in RCC patients when compared with healthy volunteers. In this small cohort, Cath D serum levels did not reveal additional clinical information in patients diagnosed with a small renal mass. Further prospective multicenter studies might shed more light on the value of Cath D in the diagnostics of RCC.

Keywords:
Renal cell cancer, Cathepsin D, Enzyme immunoassay
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.