Introduction: Open-ended straight ureteral stents are typically used for the support of the ureteroileal anastomosis during the creation of an orthotopic ‘S-pouch’ ileal neobladder. The use of double J stents as an alternative in this setting is evaluated. Materials and Methods: Medical charts from 43 patients undergoing radical cystectomy with formation of an ileal ‘S-pouch’ neobladder were retrospectively evaluated. In 30 patients (group A), a 6-Fr open-ended straight ureteral catheter was used to stent the ureteroileal anastomosis, while a double J stent was used for the same reason in 13 patients (group B). The ureteral catheter was removed 15 days after the procedure while the double J stent 3 weeks postoperatively. Hospital stay, early and late complications were evaluated for both groups during a mean follow-up period of 22.5 and 19.6 months respectively. Results: Stricture of the ureteroileal anastomosis was observed in 2 (6.6%) and 1 (7.6%) patient of groups A and B respectively. All complications presented with similar rates, except for an increased but not statistically significant incidence of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage and early urinary tract infections in group B. Hospital stay was significantly (p < 0.005) shorter for patients of group B (9.9 vs. 15.2 days). Conclusions: The use of double J stents to support the ureteroileal anastomosis can be used as an alternative to open-ended ureteral stents. With double J stents a shorter hospital stay was achieved with similar complication rates but a higher incidence of upper urinary tract infections.

Keywords:
Bladder cancer, Urinary diversion, Ureteroileal anastomosis, External ureteral catheters, Internal double J stents, Modified ileal neobladder
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.