Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of seromuscular gastrocystoplasty (SGCP) in an animal model and to compare it to conventional gastrocystoplasty (CGCP). Materials and Methods: CGCP and SGCP (using gastric segments without mucosa) were each performed in 6 dogs. In both procedures, two-thirds of the dome of the bladder were excised and the gastric segment anastomosed to the bladder remnant. Cystography, cystomanometry, measurements of urine pH, and gross and microscopic pathological studies were carried out preoperatively, and postoperatively, at 6 and 12 weeks. Results: All seromuscular gastric segments proved viable, and 6 weeks after the operation they were covered by a thin layer of transitional epithelium, which had gradually thickened by the end of the 12-week follow-up. There was no difference in bladder capacity and compliance between the two groups, however, fasting urinary pH values were higher (less acidic) in the SGCP group. Conclusions: Stripping off the mucosa of the gastric segment appears to stop hydrochloric acid secretion, thereby lessening the possible risk of ulceration, perforation, dysuria-haematuria, metaplasia and malignancy. The uroepithelium overgrowth of the seromuscular gastric segments might provide a more physiological neo-bladder than when using full-thickness gastrocystoplasty.

Keywords:
Bladder augmentation, Gastrocystoplasty, Seromuscular gastrocystoplasty
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.