Objective: To improve sensitivity by using different portions of voided urine cytology (VUC) and bladder wash material cytology (BWC). Materials and Methods: 52 patients with biopsy-proven superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder were studied. Voided urine specimens were divided into a first stream, mid-stream and terminal stream. Bladder wash material was also divided into a first portion, mid-portion and last portion. All portions were investigated for cytology abnormalities. Results: Sensitivity for the detection of malignant cells was 34.6, 38.5 and 38.5% for the first, mid- and terminal stream of VUC and 34.6, 38.5 and 34.6% for the first, mid- and last portion of BWC, respectively. The sensitivity of VUC was 20–25% for grade I, 30–40% for grade II, and 50–75% for grade III tumors, respectively. The sensitivity of BWC was 25% for grade I, 35–45% for grade II, and 33–50% for grade III tumors, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference for sensitivities between either grades (p = 0.06) or portions or streams (p = 0.3) of VUC and BWC. Conclusions: In this small group of patients, we did not find any significant difference, but we found highest sensitivity in grade III tumors with the terminal portion of the voided urine when compared to other portions of VUC. Therefore, we believe that further study in a large series is necessary to investigate this approach of differentiated BWC and especially VUC.

Keywords:
Superficial bladder cancer, Cytology, Sensitivity
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.