Sex-dependent stone formation following portacaval shunt (PCS) was investigated in 82 male and 71 female Sprague-Dawley rats. 72.6% of male PCS rats and none of the female PCS rats developed urolithiasis, in 90.2%, potassium-hydrogen-urate stones formed. Hormonal analysis revealed significant alterations in steroid hormones and glucagon postoperatively. Male PCS rats showed a significant decrease in total and free testosterone and an increase in estradiol and glucagon levels. Female PCS rats showed a marked rise in testosterone and glucagon levels as well as a decrease in estradiol plasma levels. Male PCS rats had higher urinary and plasma uric acid concentrations compared to female PCS and sham-operated rats. Loss of testosterone and rise of glucagon in males was correlated with urolithiasis in so far as stone-forming rats had higher concentrations than non-stone-forming PCS rats. Our findings suggest that hormonal alterations might contribute to sex-dependent stone formation in PCS rats.

Keywords:
Urolithiasis, Portacaval shunt, Stone formation, Hormones
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel
1993
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.