We studied the impact of antireflux surgery on bladder compliance, which was an important clinical parameter in terms of urinary incontinence and upper tract deterioration, in 20 myelodysplastics (group A). For control groups, 31 myelodysplastic children with or without reflux who were conservatively treated (group B) and 19 non-myelodysplastics who were operated on for primary reflux were investigated. The follow-up period averaged 87 months for group A and 86 months for group B. Initial bladder compliance in group A (5.1 ± 3.7 ml/cm H2O) and group B (5.9 ± 4.9 ml/cm H2O) was significantly lower than that in nonmyelodysplastics (29.6 ± 23.1 ml/cm H2O) (p < 0.01). Antireflux surgery prevented a significant elevation of bladder compliance in group A (6.9 ± 5.5 ml/cm H2O) while an increase of bladder compliance was significant in group B (10.7 ± 8.1 ml/cm H2O) (p < 0.01). In the nonmyelodysplastic group, bladder compliance slightly decreased postoperatively but remained well within the normal range (26.3 ± 12.0 ml/cm H2O). There was significant correlation between bladder compliance and bladder trabeculation (p < O.Ol), i.e. the higher the bladder compliance, the more normal-appearing the cystogram. We propose a bladder compliance of 10.0 ml/cm H2O as the lower limit of the normal range. Analysis of the present data has led to the hypothesis that any surgical intervention on or around the urinary bladder will result in a low compliance in myelodysplastic patients. We have found, on the other hand, that those who have a normal cystogram, a large bladder capacity, absence of symptomatic urinary infection, and normal renal function before antireflux surgery have a good chance of obtaining the compliant detrusor muscle postoperatively.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.