The preoperative serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PA) were determined in 35 consecutive patients who had clinically localized prostatic cancer and underwent bilateral staging pelvic lymphadenectomy. When 10.0 ng/ml of PA was used as the cutoff value for lymph node staging the specificity of an elevated PA level in revealing lymph node involvement was 77% with a sensitivity of 85% and an accuracy of 80%. Only 1 of 18 (6%) patients with negative PA levels (below 10 ng/ml) and a preoperative Gleason score 2–7 tumor had metastatic lymph node disease. Among the 17 patients with positive PA levels (above 10 ng/ml) or a Gleason score 8–10 tumor, 12 (71 %) had lymph node involvement. The preoperative PA level and the extent of local tumor invasion correlated strongly with each other. Our study suggests that the PA level could be a simple and objective parameter with which to predict metastatic lymph node disease if used in conjunction with the Gleason histological grade.

Keywords:
Prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade, Lymph node staging, Prostatic cancer
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1990 S. Karger AG, Basel
1990
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.