Introduction: This study aims to investigate the effects of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment for proximal ureteral stones on the sexual functions of patients of both genders. Methods: In this prospective study, 30 female and 72 male patients who had received SWL treatment for proximal ureteral stones in our clinic between August 2019 and October 2020 were evaluated. CT, creatinine, urinary analysis, and culture were performed during the initial consultation for all patients. Information regarding the age, BMI, and stone burden of the patients was recorded. Male patients answered the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire, and female participants answered the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) 3 times: pre-procedural and post-procedural first and third month. CT was repeated on the first month, and any residues were noted. Results: The mean IIEF-5 scores of the male patients were 23.11 ± 8.11 prior to surgery, and it decreased to 19.74 ± 7.65 in the first month and 23.88 ± 9.23 in the third, p = 0.001. The mean FSFI scores of female patients were 18.2 ± 9.9, which decreased to 12.8 ± 6.12 in the first month and 17.8 ± 8.66 in the third, p = 0.001. Univariate analysis revealed that the patients’ age (male: p = 0.004 and female: p = 0.008) and BMI (male: p = 0.044 and female: p = 0.027) were related to the poorer scores for both genders. However, there were not any significant findings regarding stone burden (male: p = 0.054 and female: p = 0.078). Conclusions: The possibility of developing temporary sexual dysfunction should be taken into account for patients who are candidates for SWL treatment. As the patient’s age and BMI increase, SWL-related sexual dysfunction becomes more severe.

1.
Kittanamongkolchai
W
,
Vaughan
LE
,
Enders
FT
,
Dhondup
T
,
Mehta
RA
,
Krambeck
AE
,
The changing incidence and presentation of urinary stones over 3 decades
.
Mayo Clin Proc
.
2018 Mar
;
93
(
3
):
291
9
. .
2.
Tseng
TY
,
Preminger
GM
.
Kidney stones
.
BMJ Clin Evid
.
2011 Nov 10
;
2011
:
2003
.
3.
Turk
C
,
Neisius
A
,
Petrik
A
,
Seitz
C
,
Skolarikos
A
,
Thomas
K
,
EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. EAoUG Office EAU guidelines
. Edn published as the
35th EAU Annual Meeting
.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
:
European Association of Urology Guidelines Office
;
2020
.
4.
Chaussy
C
,
Schüller
J
,
Schmiedt
E
,
Brandl
H
,
Jocham
D
,
Liedl
B
.
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasis
.
Urology
.
1984 May
;
23
(
5 Spec No
):
59
66
. .
5.
Ozturk
MD
,
Sener
NC
,
Goktug
HN
,
Gucuk
A
,
Nalbant
I
,
Imamoglu
MA
.
The comparison of laparoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for large proximal ureteral stones
.
Can Urol Assoc J
.
2013 Nov-Dec
;
7
(
11–12
):
E673
6
. .
6.
Tiselius
HG
.
Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?
Urol Res
.
2005 Jun
;
33
(
3
):
185
90
. .
7.
Youssef
RF
,
El-Nahas
AR
,
El-Assmy
AM
,
El-Tabey
NA
,
El-Hefnawy
AS
,
Eraky
I
,
Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study
.
Urology
.
2009 Jun
;
73
(
6
):
1184
7
.
8.
Yafi
FA
,
Jenkins
L
,
Albersen
M
,
Corona
G
,
Isidori
AM
,
Goldfarb
S
,
Erectile dysfunction
.
Nat Rev Dis Primers
.
2016 Feb 4
;
2
:
16003
. .
9.
Parish
SJ
,
Goldstein
AT
,
Goldstein
SW
,
Goldstein
I
,
Pfaus
J
,
Clayton
AH
,
Toward a More evidence-based nosology and nomenclature for female sexual dysfunctions-Part II
.
J Sex Med
.
2016 Dec
;
13
(
12
):
1888
906
. .
10.
Lewis
RW
,
Fugl-Meyer
KS
,
Corona
G
,
Hayes
RD
,
Laumann
EO
,
Moreira
ED
,
Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction
.
J Sex Med
.
2010 Apr
;
7
(
4 Pt 2
):
1598
607
. .
11.
Gratzke
C
,
Angulo
J
,
Chitaley
K
,
Dai
YT
,
Kim
NN
,
Paick
JS
,
Anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction
.
J Sex Med
.
2010 Jan
;
7
(
1 Pt 2
):
445
75
. .
12.
Althof
SE
,
Leiblum
SR
,
Chevret-Measson
M
,
Hartmann
U
,
Levine
SB
,
McCabe
M
,
Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction
.
J Sex Med
.
2005 Nov
;
2
(
6
):
793
800
. .
13.
Akdeniz
E
,
Bolat
MS
.
Ureterorenoscopy with stenting and its effect on female sexual function
.
Urol J
.
2017 May 23
;
14
(
3
):
3059
63
.
14.
Akbal
C
,
Türker
P
,
Tavukçu
HH
,
Simşek
F
,
Türkeri
L
.
Erectile function in prostate cancer-free patients who underwent prostate saturation biopsy
.
Eur Urol
.
2008 Mar
;
53
(
3
):
540
4
. .
15.
Ucer
O
,
Ceylan
Y
,
Ekren
F
,
Ozan
E
,
Muezzinoglu
T
.
Effect of anxiety and pain on success of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treatment of proximal ureteral and renal pelvic stones
.
Urolithiasis
.
2016 Nov
;
44
(
6
):
559
64
. .
16.
Sahin
C
,
Sarica
K
.
Comparative analysis of shock wave therapy success rate in management of renal stones and patient anxiety
.
South Clin Istanbul Eurasia
.
2017
;
28
:
1
.
17.
Karsiyakali
N
,
Erkan
E
,
Yucetas
U
,
Koseoglu
H
,
Ates
HA
,
Kadihasanoglu
M
,
Shock wave lithotripsy deteriorates male sexual functions related to the treatment-driven anxiety: a prospective, non-randomized, self-controlled study
.
Arch Esp Urol
.
2020 Nov
;
73
(
9
):
826
36
.
18.
Rosen
RC
,
Riley
A
,
Wagner
G
,
Osterloh
IH
,
Kirkpatrick
J
,
Mishra
A
.
The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction
.
Urology
.
1997
;
49
:
822
30
. .
19.
Rosen
R
,
Brown
C
,
Heiman
J
,
Leiblum
S
,
Meston
C
,
Shabsigh
R
,
The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function
.
J Sex Marital Ther
.
2000
;
26
:
191
208
. .
20.
Chung
DY
,
Kang
DH
,
Cho
KS
,
Jeong
WS
,
Jung
HD
,
Kwon
JK
,
Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
.
PLoS One
.
2019
;
14
(
2
):
e0211316
. .
21.
Chang
X
,
Wang
Y
,
Li
J
,
Han
Z
.
Prestenting versus nonprestenting on the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for large upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Urol Int
.
2021 Apr 15
:
1
8
. .
22.
Bozzini
G
,
Verze
P
,
Arcaniolo
D
,
Dal Piaz
O
,
Buffi
NM
,
Guazzoni
G
,
A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience: a better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones
.
World J Urol
.
2017 Dec
;
35
(
12
):
1967
75
. .
23.
Salem
S
,
Mehrsai
A
,
Zartab
H
,
Shahdadi
N
,
Pourmand
G
.
Complications and outcomes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study of 3,241 patients
.
Urol Res
.
2010 Apr
;
38
(
2
):
135
42
. .
24.
Altok
M
,
Akpinar
A
,
Güneş
M
,
Umul
M
,
Demirci
K
,
Baş
E
.
Do anxiety, stress, or depression have any impact on pain perception during shock wave lithotripsy?
Can Urol Assoc J
.
2016 MayJun
;
10
(
5–6
):
E171
4
. .
25.
Sahin
C
,
Tuncer
M
,
Yazıcı
O
,
Horuz
R
,
Çetinel
AC
,
Eryıldırım
B
,
Do the residual fragments after shock wave lithotripsy affect the quality of life?
Urology
.
2014 Sep
;
84
(
3
):
549
54
. .
26.
Ceylan
Y
,
Ucer
O
,
Bozkurt
O
,
Gunlusoy
B
,
Mertoglu
O
,
Zumrutbas
AE
,
The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones
.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol
.
2018 Jun
;
27
(
3
):
148
52
. .
27.
Emanu
JC
,
Avildsen
IK
,
Nelson
CJ
.
Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: prevalence, medical treatments, and psychosocial interventions
.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care
.
2016 Mar
;
10
(
1
):
102
7
. .
28.
Modh
RA
,
Mulhall
JP
,
Gilbert
SM
.
Sexual dysfunction after cystectomy and urinary diversion
.
Nat Rev Urol
.
2014 Aug
;
11
(
8
):
445
53
. .
29.
Eryildirim
B
,
Tuncer
M
,
Kuyumcuoglu
U
,
Faydaci
G
,
Tarhan
F
,
Ozgül
A
.
Do ureteral catheterisation procedures affect sexual functions? A controlled prospective study
.
Andrologia
.
2012 May
;
44
(
Suppl 1
):
419
23
. .
30.
Sofer
M
,
Yehiely
R
,
Greenstein
A
,
Bar-Yosef
Y
,
Matzkin
H
,
Chen
J
.
Endourological procedures and sexual dysfunction: a prospective multivariate analysis
.
BJU Int
.
2012 Jan
;
109
(
2
):
250
3
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.