Introduction: Transposition of the gracilis has been used in a large number of reconstructive procedures. Its advantage is its proximity to these defects and a good blood supply. Traditionally, the gracilis mobilization is performed by open surgery with one or more incisions. We describe our initial experience with the video-endoscopic mobilization of gracilis. Method: We described a retrospective review of all patients who underwent gracilis muscle mobilization for treatment of rectourethral fistula, performed by video-endoscopy, between March 2013 and September 2017, for treatment of rectourethral fistula. Also, our surgical technique is described in detail. Results: Three patients, with a mean age of 66.6 years, underwent the procedures. The mean time for mobilization of the gracilis was 107 min (range 60–145). There was no case of donor area infection, no change in the sensitivity of the medial aspect of the thigh or chronic pain. Conversion to open surgery was not necessary in any case. The hospital discharge occurred in average after 4 days. The bladder catheter was removed after 4 weeks after cystography was performed without evidence of leakage. One patient had a recurrence of the fistula. Discussion: The gracilis is an excellent choice of tissue to be interposed in reconstructive procedures of the perineal region, especially in the treatment of rectourinary fistulas. However, endoscopic harvest of the gracilis muscle has not yet found its way into everyday practice. The results in the treatment of rectourinary fistulas are excellent, with a success rate of 87.7%. Our rate of 67% is below, probably due to the small number of cases. In open surgery, complications are uncommon; however, approximately half of the patients expressed concern about the painful scar, which can be reduced by minimally invasive access. Conclusion: Video-endoscopic mobilization of gracilis muscle for the treatment of rectourethral fistula is feasible and safe. Studies comparing this technique with the conventional mobilization are required.

1.
Ulrich
D
,
Roos
J
,
Jakse
G
,
Pallua
N
.
Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of recto-urethral and rectovaginal fistulas: a retrospective analysis of 35 cases
.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
.
2009
;
62
(
3
):
352
6
. .
2.
Ghoniem
G
,
Elmissiry
M
,
Weiss
E
,
Langford
C
,
Abdelwahab
H
,
Wexner
S
.
Transperineal repair of complex rectourethral fistula using gracilis muscle flap interposition: can urinary and bowel functions be preserved?
J Urol
.
2008 May
;
179
(
5
):
1882
6
. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022534708000244.
3.
Rabau
M
,
Zmora
O
,
Tulchinsky
H
,
Gur
E
,
Goldman
G
.
Recto-vaginal/urethral fistula: repair with gracilis muscle transposition
.
Acta Chir Iugosl
.
2006
;
53
(
2
):
81
4
. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17139891.
4.
Tran
H
,
Flannigan
R
,
Rapoport
D
.
Transperineal approach to complex rectourinary fistulae
.
Can Urol Assoc J
.
2015
;
9
(
9
):
E916
20
. .
5.
Lin
CH
,
Wei
FC
,
Lin
YT
.
Conventional versus endoscopic free gracilis muscle harvest
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
.
2000 Jan
;
105
(
1
):
89
93
. https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006534-200001000-00015.
6.
Takano
S
,
Boutros
M
,
Wexner
SD
.
Gracilis muscle transposition for complex perineal fistulas and sinuses: a systematic literature review of surgical outcomes
.
J Am Coll Surg
.
2014
;
219
(
219
):
313
23
. .
7.
Pfalzgraf
D
,
Isbarn
H
,
Reiss
P
,
Meyer-Moldenhauer
WH
,
Fisch
M
,
Dahlem
R
.
Outcomes after recto-anastomosis fistula repair in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
.
BJU Int
.
2014
;
113
(
4
):
568
73
. .
8.
Garlock
J
.
The cure of an intractable vesicovaginal fistula by the use of pedicled muscle graft.PDF
.
Surg Gynecol Obs
.
1928
;(
47
):
255
.
9.
Wexner
SD
,
Gonzalez-Padron
A
,
Teoh
TA
,
Moon
HK
.
The stimulated gracilis neosphincter for fecal incontinence: a new use for an old concept
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
.
1996 Sep
;
98
(
4
):
693
9
. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8773692.
10.
Hechenbleikner
EM
,
Buckley
JC
,
Wick
EC
.
Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes
.
Dis Colon Rectum
.
2013
;
56
(
56
):
374
83
. .
11.
Wexner
SD
,
Ruiz
DE
,
Genua
J
,
Nogueras
JJ
,
Weiss
EG
,
Zmora
O
.
Gracilis muscle interposition for the treatment of rectourethral, rectovaginal, and pouch-vaginal fistulas: results in 53 patients
.
Ann Surg
.
2008
;
248
(
1
):
39
43
. .
12.
El Ghoneimy
MMN
,
Abdel Rassoul
M
,
El Tamimi
A
.
Use of gracilis flap interposition in repair of urethrorectal fistulae, whether through a transperineal or transanal approach
.
Eur Urol Open Sci
.
2020 Jul
;
19
(
Suppl 2
):
e375
. https://www.eu-openscience.europeanurology.com/article/S2666-1683(20)32808-1/pdf.
13.
Gilshtein
H
,
Strassman
V
,
Wexner
SD
.
Redo gracilis interposition for complex perineal fistulas
.
Tech Coloproctol
.
2020
;
24
(
24
):
475
8
. .
14.
Raup
VT
,
Eswara
JR
,
Geminiani
J
,
Madison
K
,
Heningburg
AM
,
Brandes
SB
.
Gracilis muscle interposition flap repair of urinary fistulae: pelvic radiation is associated with persistent urinary incontinence and decreased quality of life
.
World J Urol
.
2016
;
34
(
34
):
131
6
. .
15.
Zmora
O
,
Tulchinsky
H
,
Gur
E
,
Goldman
G
,
Klausner
JM
,
Rabau
M
.
Gracilis muscle transposition for fistulas between the rectum and urethra or vagina
.
Dis Colon Rectum
.
2006
;
49
(
9
):
1316
21
. .
16.
Britto
CA
,
Rebouças
RB
,
Lopes
TRA
,
da Costa
TS
,
de Carvalho Holanda Leite
R
,
de Carvalho
PSL
.
Video-assisted left inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer
.
Int Braz J Urol
.
2012
;
38
(
38
):
289
; discussion 290. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22555046.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.