Introduction: Trans-perineal urethroplasty is the preferred treatment for distraction urethral injuries in adults. However, management of such injuries in children is challenging because of functional implications in a growing child. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of perineal urethroplasty for distraction urethral injuries in children. Methods: The medical records of prepubertal pediatric patients (age <14 years) with traumatic urethral distraction injuries managed by perineal urethroplasty were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed with respect to demographics, stricture characteristics, management, complications, follow-up, and outcome. Results: A total of 14 patients were included in the study. Ten had membranous, and 4 had bulbar urethral strictures. All membranous strictures were secondary to pelvic trauma; bulbar strictures were secondary to blunt perineal trauma; 7 patients had associated pelvic fractures. Anastomotic urethroplasty was used in 10 patients (71.4%) and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty was done in 4 patients (38.6%). The mean follow-up duration was 56 months (range 24–76). Surgery was primarily successful in 85.7%. Failed repair in 2 patients was successfully managed with augmented anastomotic urethroplasty. Post-operatively, the mean maximal urinary flow rate was 26.4 mL/s. No significant complications occurred. All boys are continent. There was no chordee or urethral diverticula, during follow-up. Conclusion: In pediatric patients, bulbar and membranous strictures can be treated successfully with urethroplasty using the perineal approach. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm that these good results are maintained as these patients cross into adulthood, especially as these repairs were done before puberty.

1.
Rourke
KF
,
Jordan
GH
.
Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture
.
J Urol
.
2005
;
173
(
4
):
1206
10
. .
2.
Hosseini
SY
,
Safarinejad
MR
.
Early versus delayed internal urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture after urethroplasty in children
.
Urol J
.
2005
;
2
(
3
):
165
8
.
3.
Herle
K
,
Jehangir
S
,
Thomas
RJ
.
Stricture urethra in children: an Indian perspective
.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg
.
2018 Oct–Dec
;
23
(
4
):
192
7
. .
4.
Johanson
B
.
Reconstruction of the male urethra in strictures. Application of the buried intact epithelium technic
.
Acta Chir Scand
.
1953
;
176
(
Suppl 176
):
1
89
.
5.
Morra
MN
,
Das
S
.
Traumatic stricture of prostatic urethra in ten-year-old boy
.
Urology
.
1991
;
38
(
6
):
552
3
. .
6.
Frank
JD
,
Pocock
RD
,
Stower
MJ
.
Urethral strictures in childhood
.
Br J Urol
.
1998
;
62
(
6
):
590
2
.
7.
Hsiao
KC
,
Baez-Trinidad
L
,
Lendvay
T
,
Smith
EA
,
Broecker
B
,
Scherz
H
,
Direct vision internal urethrotomy for the treatment of pediatric urethral strictures: analysis of 50 patients
.
J Urol
.
2003
;
170
:
952
3
.
8.
Noe
HN
.
Long-term followup of endoscopic management of urethral strictures in children
.
J Urol
.
1987
;
137
(
5
):
951
3
.
9.
Vetterlein
MW
,
Weisbach
L
,
Riechardt
S
,
Fisch
M
.
Anterior urethral strictures in children: disease etiology and comparative effectiveness of endoscopic treatment vs. open surgical reconstruction
.
Front Pediatr
.
2019
;
7
(
5
):
5
. .
10.
Hafez
AT
,
El-Assmy
A
,
Sarhan
O
,
El-Hefnawy
AS
,
Ghoneim
MA
.
Perineal anastomotic urethroplasty for managing post-traumatic urethral strictures in children: the long-term outcome
.
BJU Int
.
2005
;
95
(
3
):
403
6
. .
11.
Kaplan
GW
,
Brock
WA
.
Urethral strictures in children
.
J Urol
.
1983
;
129
(
6
):
1200
. .
12.
Podestá
ML
.
Use of the perineal and perineal-abdominal (transpubic) approach for delayed management of pelvic fracture urethral obliterative strictures in children: long-term outcome
.
J Urol
.
1998
;
160
(
1
):
160
4
. .
13.
Kaplan
GW
,
Brock
JW
,
Fisch
M
,
Koraitim
MM
,
Snyder
HM
.
SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: urethral strictures in children
.
Urology
.
2014
;
83
(
3 Suppl
):
S71
3
. .
14.
Waterhouse
K
,
Abrahams
JI
,
Gruber
H
,
Hackett
RE
,
Patil
UB
,
Peng
BK
.
The transpubic approach to the lower urinary tract
.
J Urol
.
1973
;
109
(
3
):
486
90
. .
15.
Turner-Warwick
R
.
A personal view of the management of traumatic posterior urethral strictures
.
Urol Clin North Am
.
1977
;
4
(
1
):
111
24
.
16.
Badenoch
AW
.
A pull-through operation for impassable traumatic stricture of the urethra
.
Br J Urol
.
1950
;
22
(
4
):
404
9
. .
17.
Senocak
ME
,
Ciftci
AO
,
Buyukpamukcu
N
,
Hicsonmez
A
.
Transpubic urethroplasty in children. Report of 10 cases with review of the literature
.
J Pediatr Surg
.
1995
;
30
:
1319
24
.
18.
Patil
UB
.
Long-term results of transpubic prostatomembranous urethroplasty in children
.
J Urol
.
1986
;
136
(
1 Pt 2
):
286
7
. .
19.
Waterloos
M
,
Verla
W
,
Spinoit
AF
,
Oosterlinck
W
,
Van Laecke
E
,
Hoebeke
P
,
Urethroplasty for urethral injuries and trauma-related strictures in children and adolescents: a single-institution experience
.
J Pediatr Urol
.
2019
;
15
(
2
):
e1
176
. .
20.
Zafar
GM
,
Hayat
S
,
Amin
J
,
Humayun
F
.
Outcome of anastomotic urethroplasty in traumatic stricture (distraction defect) of posterior urethra in boys
.
Arab J Urol
.
2020 Feb 9
;
18
(
2
):
94
100
. .
21.
Flynn
BJ
,
Delvecchio
FC
,
Webster
GD
.
Perineal repair of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects: experience in 120 patients during the last 10 years
.
J Urol
.
2003
;
170
(
5
):
1877
80
. .
22.
Basiri
A
,
Shadpour
P
,
Moradi
MR
,
Ahmadinia
H
,
Madaen
K
.
Symphysiotomy: a viable approach for delayed management of posterior urethral injuries in children
.
J Urol
.
2002
;
168
(
5
):
2166
9
. .
23.
Hafez
AT
,
El-Assmy
A
,
Dawaba
MS
,
Sarhan
O
,
Bazeed
M
.
Long-term outcome of visual internal urethrotomy for the management of pediatric urethral strictures
.
J Urol
.
2005
;
173
(
2
):
595
7
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.