Objectives: To evaluate Guy’s Stone Score (GSS) as a grading system for the complexity of renal calculi before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and as a predictor for stone-free rate (SFR) and potential complications in the setting of a developing country with many cases of advanced complex stone disease. Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective study on 115 patients with renal stones who had PCNL between August 2017 and October 2018. Stone complexity was classified according to GSS using preoperative imaging. The rates of perioperative complications were assessed using the Clavien grading system, and the SFR was assessed in the 3rd postoperative week by abdominal X-ray and renal ultrasound. The χ2 and one-way ANOVA tests were used for statistical analysis. A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: The study included 115 patients (77 males) with a mean age of 50.2 (±13.3) years. Cases were classified according to GSS into 4 grades; there were 24 (20.9%) grade I, 48 (41.7%) grade II, 25 (21.7%) grade III, and 18 (15.7%) grade IV cases. There was a significant inverse correlation between GSS grade and SFR (p < 0.001). The rate of complications using the Clavien grading system were significantly higher in GSS grades III and IV (p = 0.002). So were the rates of blood transfusion, the need for >1 access tract, and the duration of hospitalization. Conclusion: GSS is a simple and easily reproducible system to classify the complexity of renal stones. In our setting, it also proved an excellent tool to predict SFR, perioperative complications, and associated ancillary procedures. Ultimately, it can help surgeons and, above all, patients to make a more informed decision about their surgery.

1.
Huang
WY
,
Chen
YF
,
Carter
S
,
Chang
HC
,
Lan
CF
,
Huang
KH
.
Epidemiology of upper urinary tract stone disease in a Taiwanese population: a nationwide, population based study
.
J Urol
.
2013
Jun
;
189
(
6
):
2158
63
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
2.
Fink
HA
,
Wilt
TJ
,
Eidman
KE
,
Garimella
PS
,
MacDonald
R
,
Rutks
IR
, et al.
Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline
.
Ann Intern Med
.
2013
Apr
;
158
(
7
):
535
43
.
[PubMed]
0003-4819
3.
Douglas-Moore
J
,
Miller
M
.
Contemporary management of renal stones
.
Trends in Urology & Men’s Health.
2015
;
6
(
5
):
9
12
.
4.
Mak
DK
,
Smith
Y
,
Buchholz
N
,
El-Husseiny
T
.
What is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - Prone or supine? A systematic review
.
Arab J Urol
.
2016
Mar
;
14
(
2
):
101
7
.
[PubMed]
2090-598X
5.
Mandal
S
,
Goel
A
,
Kathpalia
R
,
Sankhwar
S
,
Singh
V
,
Sinha
RJ
, et al.
Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy’s Stone Score: A single-center experience
.
Indian J Urol
.
2012
Oct
;
28
(
4
):
392
8
.
[PubMed]
0970-1591
6.
Michel
MS
,
Trojan
L
,
Rassweiler
JJ
.
Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2007
Apr
;
51
(
4
):
899
906
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
7.
Seitz
C
,
Desai
M
,
Häcker
A
,
Hakenberg
OW
,
Liatsikos
E
,
Nagele
U
, et al.
Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy
.
Eur Urol
.
2012
Jan
;
61
(
1
):
146
58
.
[PubMed]
0302-2838
8.
Vicentini
FC
,
Marchini
GS
,
Mazzucchi
E
,
Claro
JF
,
Srougi
M
.
Utility of the Guy’s stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes
.
Urology
.
2014
Jun
;
83
(
6
):
1248
53
.
[PubMed]
0090-4295
9.
Smith
A
,
Averch
TD
,
Shahrour
K
,
Opondo
D
,
Daels
FP
,
Labate
G
, et al.;
CROES PCNL Study Group
.
A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
J Urol
.
2013
Jul
;
190
(
1
):
149
56
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
10.
Jeong
CW
,
Jung
JW
,
Cha
WH
,
Lee
BK
,
Lee
S
,
Jeong
SJ
, et al.
Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for Predicting Stone-Free Rate after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
.
PLoS One
.
2013
Jun
;
8
(
6
):
e65888
.
[PubMed]
1932-6203
11.
Khalil
M
,
Sherif
H
,
Mohey
A
,
Omar
R
.
Utility of the Guy’s Stone Score in predicting different aspects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
Afr J Urol
.
2018
;
24
(
3
):
191
6
. 1110-5704
12.
Tailly
TO
,
Okhunov
Z
,
Nadeau
BR
,
Huynh
MJ
,
Labadie
K
,
Akhavein
A
, et al.
Multicenter External Validation and Comparison of Stone Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
.
J Endourol
.
2016
May
;
30
(
5
):
594
601
.
[PubMed]
0892-7790
13.
Ozdedeli
K
,
Cek
M
.
Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
Balkan Med J
.
2012
Sep
;
29
(
3
):
230
5
.
[PubMed]
2146-3123
14.
Delvecchio
FC
,
Preminger
GM
.
Management of residual stones
.
Urol Clin North Am
.
2000
May
;
27
(
2
):
347
54
.
[PubMed]
0094-0143
15.
Yarimoglu
S
,
Polat
S
,
Bozkurt
IH
,
Yonguc
T
,
Aydogdu
O
,
Aydın
E
, et al.
Comparison of S.T.O.N.E and CROES nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single center study with 262 cases
.
Urolithiasis
.
2017
Oct
;
45
(
5
):
489
94
.
[PubMed]
2194-7228
16.
Thomas
K
,
Smith
NC
,
Hegarty
N
,
Glass
JM
.
The Guy’s stone score—grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures
.
Urology
.
2011
Aug
;
78
(
2
):
277
81
.
[PubMed]
0090-4295
17.
Ingimarsson
JP
,
Dagrosa
LM
,
Hyams
ES
,
Pais
VM
 Jr
.
External validation of a preoperative renal stone grading system: reproducibility and inter-rater concordance of the Guy’s stone score using preoperative computed tomography and rigorous postoperative stone-free criteria
.
Urology
.
2014
Jan
;
83
(
1
):
45
9
.
[PubMed]
0090-4295
18.
de Souza Melo
PA
,
Vicentini
FC
,
Beraldi
AA
,
Hisano
M
,
Murta
CB
,
de Almeida Claro
JF
.
Outcomes of more than 1 000 percutaneous nephrolithotomies and validation of Guy’s stone score
.
BJU Int
.
2018
Apr
;
121
(
4
):
640
6
.
[PubMed]
1464-4096
19.
Sinha
RK
,
Mukherjee
S
,
Jindal
T
,
Sharma
PK
,
Saha
B
,
Mitra
N
, et al.
Evaluation of stone-free rate using Guy’s Stone Score and assessment of complications using modified Clavien grading system for percutaneous nephro-lithotomy
.
Urolithiasis
.
2015
Aug
;
43
(
4
):
349
53
.
[PubMed]
2194-7228
20.
Ganpule
A
,
Desai
M
.
Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis
.
J Endourol
.
2009
Mar
;
23
(
3
):
399
403
.
[PubMed]
0892-7790
21.
Okhunov
Z
,
Friedlander
JI
,
George
AK
,
Duty
BD
,
Moreira
DM
,
Srinivasan
AK
, et al.
S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi
.
Urology
.
2013
Jun
;
81
(
6
):
1154
9
.
[PubMed]
0090-4295
22.
Noureldin
Y
,
Elkoushy
M
,
Andonian
S
.
691 Which is better? Guy’s vs S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
.
Eur Urol Suppl
.
2015
;
14
(
2
):
e691
e691a
. 1569-9056
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.