Purpose: With a median age at diagnosis of 73 years, bladder cancer has the highest median age of all cancers. Age alone seems to be an independent risk factor for developing the disease with peak age advancing into the range of 85 years. As demographic changes will lead to an ever more aging population in western countries, incidence of advanced age malignancies will rise. We, therefore, analyzed a contemporary radical cystectomy (RC) series at a single high-volume center on patients undergoing RC for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). We aim to evaluate the feasibility of RC in the oldest-old patient cohort by assessing perioperative complications and long-term outcome. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 1,278 consecutive patients who underwent RC for UCB at our tertiary referral center between 2004 and 2019. A total of 408 patients were aged 75–97 years at the time of RC and were further divided into 2 groups: 75–84 years of age (group 1) and ≥85 years of age (group 2). Median follow-up was 23 months. Outcome was analyzed using the χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test. Results: Perioperative Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications were seen in 25.1% (92/366) of group 1 patients and 35.7% (15/42) of group 2 patients (p = 0.073). Thirty- and 90-day mortality was 3.3 and 8.7% in group 1 and 4.8 and 14.3% in group 2 (p = 0.617 and p = 0.242, respectively). Three-year overall survival was 54.6% in group 1 and 31.3% in group 2 (p = 0.03). Three-year cancer-specific survival was 64.8% in group 1 and 38.8% in group 2 (p = 0.037). Recurrence-free survival was 105 months in group 1 and 12 months in group 2 (p = 0.039). Conclusion: In light of increasing life expectancy in western nations, we sought to evaluate the impact of age in a large series of elderly patients undergoing RC for UCB. We found that RC offers acceptable perioperative complication rates in the oldest-old patient cohort (≥85 years). Therefore, RC for UCB can be offered as a viable treatment option even in the oldest patients.

1.
Antoni
S
,
Ferlay
J
,
Soerjomataram
I
,
Znaor
A
,
Jemal
A
,
Bray
F
.
Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
71
(
1
):
96
108
.
2.
American Cancer Society. Key statistics for bladder cancer. cancerstatisticscentercancerorg. 2020
.
3.
Burger
M
,
Catto
JW
,
Dalbagni
G
,
Grossman
HB
,
Herr
H
,
Karakiewicz
P
, et al.
Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer
.
Eur Urol
.
2013
;
63
(
2
):
234
41
.
4.
Smith
AB
,
Deal
AM
,
Woods
ME
,
Wallen
EM
,
Pruthi
RS
,
Chen
RC
, et al.
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: evaluating treatment and survival in the national cancer data base
.
BJU Int
.
2014
;
114
(
5
):
719
26
.
5.
Charlton
ME
,
Adamo
MP
,
Sun
L
,
Deorah
S
.
Bladder cancer collaborative stage variables and their data quality, usage, and clinical implications: a review of SEER data, 2004–2010
.
Cancer
.
2014
;
120
(
Suppl 23
):
3815
25
.
6.
Stein
JP
,
Lieskovsky
G
,
Cote
R
,
Groshen
S
,
Feng
AC
,
Boyd
S
, et al.
Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2001
;
19
(
3
):
666
75
.
7.
Goldspink
DF
.
Ageing and activity: their effects on the functional reserve capacities of the heart and vascular smooth and skeletal muscles
.
Ergonomics
.
2005
;
48
(
11–14
):
1334
51
.
8.
Ali
TF
,
Warkentin
LM
,
Gazala
S
,
Wagg
AS
,
Padwal
RS
,
Khadaroo
RG
, et al.
Self-reported outcomes in individuals aged 65 and older admitted for treatment to an acute care surgical service: a 6-month prospective cohort study
.
J Am Geriatr Soc
.
2015
;
63
(
11
):
2388
94
.
9.
Gazala
S
,
Tul
Y
,
Wagg
A
,
Widder
SL
,
Khadaroo
RG
,
Acute
C
, et al.
Quality of life and long-term outcomes of octo- and nonagenarians following acute care surgery: a cross sectional study
.
World J Emerg Surg
.
2013
;
8
(
1
):
23
.
10.
De Nunzio
C
,
Cicione
A
,
Izquierdo
L
,
Lombardo
R
,
Tema
G
,
Lotrecchiano
G
, et al.
Multicenter analysis of postoperative complications in octogenarians after radical cystectomy and ureterocutaneostomy: the role of the frailty index
.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
.
2019
;
17
(
5
):
402
7
.
11.
Janisch
F
,
Yu
H
,
Vetterlein
MW
,
Dahlem
R
,
Engel
O
,
Fisch
M
, et al.
Do younger patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer have better outcomes?
J Clin Med
.
2019
;
8
(
9
):
1459
.
12.
Karl
A
,
Buchner
A
,
Becker
A
,
Staehler
M
,
Seitz
M
,
Khoder
W
, et al.
A new concept for early recovery after surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective randomized study
.
J Urol
.
2014
;
191
(
2
):
335
40
.
13.
Ziegelmueller
BK
,
Jokisch
JF
,
Buchner
A
,
Grimm
T
,
Kretschmer
A
,
Schulz
GB
, et al.
Long-term follow-up and oncological outcome of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer following an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: results of a large randomized, prospective, single-center study
.
Urol Int
.
2020
;
104
(
1–2
):
55
61
.
14.
Comploj
E
,
West
J
,
Mian
M
,
Kluth
LA
,
Karl
A
,
Dechet
C
, et al.
Comparison of complications from radical cystectomy between old-old versus oldest-old patients
.
Urol Int
.
2015
;
94
(
1
):
25
30
.
15.
Alfred Witjes
J
,
Lebret
T
,
Compérat
EM
,
Cowan
NC
,
De Santis
M
,
Bruins
HM
, et al.
Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
71
(
3
):
462
75
.
16.
Clavien
PA
,
Barkun
J
,
de Oliveira
ML
,
Vauthey
JN
,
Dindo
D
,
Schulick
RD
, et al.
The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience
.
Ann Surg
.
2009
;
250
(
2
):
187
96
.
17.
Dindo
D
,
Demartines
N
,
Clavien
PA
.
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
.
Ann Surg
.
2004
;
240
(
2
):
205
13
.
18.
Pycha
A
,
Comploj
E
.
The dilemma of cystectomy in old-old and oldest-old patients
.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther
.
2011
;
11
(
12
):
1863
70
.
19.
Yancik
R
,
Ganz
PA
,
Varricchio
CG
,
Conley
B
.
Perspectives on comorbidity and cancer in older patients: approaches to expand the knowledge base
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2001
;
19
(
4
):
1147
51
.
20.
Burg
ML
,
Clifford
TG
,
Bazargani
ST
,
Lin-Brande
M
,
Miranda
G
,
Cai
J
, et al.
Frailty as a predictor of complications after radical cystectomy: a prospective study of various preoperative assessments
.
Urol Oncol
.
2019
;
37
(
1
):
40
7
.
21.
Moschini
M
,
Martini
A
,
Zamboni
S
,
Mattei
A
,
Baumeister
P
,
Di Bona
C
, et al.
Evaluation of cause of death after radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: the impact of age at the time of surgery
.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
.
2019
;
17
(
3
):
e541
e8
.
22.
Bream
MJ
,
Maurice
MJ
,
Altschuler
J
,
Zhu
H
,
Abouassaly
R
.
Increased use of cystectomy in patients 75 and older: a contemporary analysis of survival and perioperative outcomes from the national cancer database
.
Urology
.
2017
;
100
:
72
8
.
23.
Horovitz
D
,
Turker
P
,
Bostrom
PJ
,
Mirtti
T
,
Nurmi
M
,
Kuk
C
, et al.
Does patient age affect survival after radical cystectomy?
BJU Int
.
2012
;
110
(
11 Pt B
):
E486
93
.
24.
Donat
SM
,
Siegrist
T
,
Cronin
A
,
Savage
C
,
Milowsky
MI
,
Herr
HW
.
Radical cystectomy in octogenarians: does morbidity outweigh the potential survival benefits?
J Urol
.
2010
;
183
(
6
):
2171
7
.
25.
Roghmann
F
,
Noldus
J
,
von Bodman
C
,
Holz
A
,
Brock
M
,
Palisaar
J
.
[Cystectomy in elderly patients: analysis of complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification]
.
Urologe A
.
2012
;
51
(
10
):
1386
92
.
26.
Tyritzis
SI
,
Anastasiou
I
,
Stravodimos
KG
,
Alevizopoulos
A
,
Kollias
A
,
Balangas
A
, et al.
Radical cystectomy over the age of 75 is safe and increases survival
.
BMC Geriatr
.
2012
;
12
:
18
.
27.
Martini
A
,
Sfakianos
JP
,
Renström-Koskela
L
,
Mortezavi
A
,
Falagario
UG
,
Egevad
L
, et al.
The natural history of untreated muscle-invasive bladder cancer
.
BJU Int
.
2020
;
125
(
2
):
270
5
.
28.
Shariat
SF
,
Sfakianos
JP
,
Droller
MJ
,
Karakiewicz
PI
,
Meryn
S
,
Bochner
BH
.
The effect of age and gender on bladder cancer: a critical review of the literature
.
BJU Int
.
2010
;
105
(
3
):
300
8
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.