Whether species that have persisted throughout historic climatic upheavals will survive contemporary climate change will depend on their ecological and physiological traits, their evolutionary potential, and potentially upon the resources that humans commit to prevent their extinction. For those species where temperatures influence sex determination, rapid global warming poses a unique risk of skewed sex ratios and demographic collapse. Here we review the specific mechanisms by which reptiles with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) may be imperilled at current rates of warming, and discuss the evidence for and against adaptation via behavioural or physiological means. We propose a scheme for ranking reptiles with TSD according to their vulnerability to rapid global warming, but note that critical data on the lability of the sex determining mechanism and on the heritability of behavioural and threshold traits are unavailable for most species. Nevertheless, we recommend a precautionary approach to management of reptiles identified as being at relatively high risk. In such cases, management should aim to neutralise directional sex ratio biases (e.g. by manipulating incubation temperatures or assisted migration) and promote adaptive processes, possibly by genetic supplementation of populations. These practices should aid species’ persistence and buy time for research directed at more accurate prediction of species’ vulnerability.

Keywords:
Adaptation, Climate change, Conservation, Extinction, Heritability, Reptile, Sex determination, Temperature, TSD
1.
Ackert RP Jr, Becker RA, Singer BS, Kurz MD, Caffee MW, Mickelson DM: Patagonian glacier response during the late glacial-Holocene transition. Science 321:392–395 (2008).
2.
Allendorf FW, Luikart G: Conservation and the Genetics of Populations (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2007).
3.
Baillie JEM, Collen B, Amin R, Akcakaya HR, Butchart SHM, et al: Towards monitoring global biodiversity. Conserv Lett 1:18–26 (2008).
4.
Barrows TT, Lehman SJ, Fifield LK, De Deckker P: Absence of cooling in New Zealand and the adjacent ocean during the Younger Dryas chronozone. Science 318:86–89 (2007).
5.
Beebee TJC: Amphibian breeding and climate. Nature 374:219–220 (1995).
6.
Bekessy SA, Ennos RA, Burgman MA, Newton AC, Ades PK: Neutral DNA markers fail to detect genetic divergence in an ecologically important trait. Biol Conserv 110:267–275 (2003).
7.
Berner RA: Examination of hypotheses for the Permo-Triassic boundary extinction by carbon cycle modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4172–4177 (2002).
8.
Berry O, Tocher MD, Gleeson DM, Sarre SD: Effect of vegetation matrix on animal dispersal: Genetic evidence from a study of endangered skinks. Conserv Biol 19:855–864 (2005).
9.
Booth DT: Artificial incubation, in Deeming DC (ed): Reptilian Incubation: Environment, Evolution and Behaviour, pp 253–263 (Nottingham University Press, Nottingham 2004).
10.
Boyle MC, FitzSimmons NN, Limpus CJ, Kelez S, Velez-Zuazo X, Waycott M: Evidence for transoceanic migrations by loggerhead sea turtles in the southern Pacific Ocean. Proc Biol Sci Ser B 276:1993–1999 (2009).
11.
Bradshaw SD: Growth and mortality in a field population of Amphibolurus lizards exposed to seasonal cold and aridity. J Zool 165:1–25 (1971).
12.
Bull JJ, Bulmer MG: Longevity enhances selection of environmental sex determination. Heredity 63:315–320 (1989).
13.
Bull J, Gutzke W, Bulmer M: Nest choice in a captive lizard with temperature-dependent sex determination. J Evol Biol 1:177–184 (1988).
14.
Cadi A, Delmas V, Prévot-Julliard A-C, Joly P, Pieau C, Girondot M: Successful reproduction of the introduced slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) in the South of France. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14:237–246 (2004).
15.
Caughley G: Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63:215–244 (1994).
16.
Chu TC, Booth DT, Limpus CJ: Estimating the sex ratio of loggerhead turtle hatchlings at Mon Repos rookery (Australia) from nest temperatures. Aust J Zool 56:57–64 (2008).
17.
Cook RP: Dispersal, home range establishment, survival, and reproduction of translocated eastern box turtles, Terrapene c. carolina. Appl Herpetol 1:197–228 (2004).
18.
Crick HQP, Sparks TH: Climate change related to egg-laying trends. Nature 399:423–424 (1999).
19.
Deeming DC: Prevalence of TSD in crocodilians, in Valenzuela N, Lance VA (eds): Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates, pp 33–41 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington 2004).
20.
Doody JS, Guarino F, Georges A, Corey B, Murray G, Ewert MW: Nest site choice compensates for climate effects on sex ratios in a lizard with environmental sex determination. Evol Ecol Res 20:307–330 (2006).
21.
Driscoll DA: Extinction and outbreaks accompany fragmentation of a reptile community. Ecol Appl 14:220–240 (2004).
22.
Edwards M, Richardson AJ: Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch. Nature 430:881–884 (2004).
23.
Enneson JJ, Litzgus JD: Using long-term data and a stage-classified matrix to assess conservation strategies for an endangered turtle (Clemmys guttata). Biol Conserv 141:1560–1568 (2008).
24.
Ewert MA, Etchberger CR, Nelson CE: Turtle sex-determining modes and TSD patterns, and some TSD pattern correlates, in Valenzuela N, Lance VA (eds): Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates, pp 21–32 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington 2004).
25.
Ewert MA, Lang JW, Nelson CE: Geographic variation in the pattern of temperature-dependent sex determination in the American snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). J Zool 265:81–95 (2005).
26.
Fastovsky DE, Weishampel DB: The Evolution and Extinction of the Dinosaurs. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005).
27.
Freedberg S, Bowne DR: Monitoring juveniles across years reveals non-Fisherian sex ratios in a reptile with environmental sex determination. Evol Ecol Res 8:1499–1510 (2006).
28.
Freedberg S, Wade MJ: Cultural inheritance as a mechanism for population sex-ratio bias in reptiles. Evolution 55:1049–1055 (2001).
29.
Germano JM, Bishop PJ: Suitability of amphibians and reptiles for translocation. Conserv Biol 23:7–15 (2009).
30.
Gibbons JW, Scott DE, Ryan TJ, Buhlmann KA, Tuberville TD, et al: The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians. Bioscience 50:653–666 (2000).
31.
Girondot M, Delmas V, Rivalan P, Courchamp F, Prévot-Julliard A-C, Godfrey M: Implications of temperature-dependent sex determination for population dynamics, in Valenzuela N, Lance VA (eds): Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates, pp 148–155 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington 2004).
32.
Glen F, Mrosovsky N: Antigua revisited: the impact of climate change on sand and nest temperatures at a hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) nesting beach. Global Change Biol 10:2036–2045 (2004).
33.
Gruber MAM: Conservation of tuatara (Sphenodon): an evaluation of the survival and growth of artificially incubated, head-started juveniles. B Sc (hons) thesis, University of Wellington, Victoria (2007).
34.
Harlow PS: Temperature-dependent sex determination in lizards, in Valenzuela N, Lance VA (eds): Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates, pp 42–52 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington 2004).
35.
Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ: Investigating the potential impacts of climate change on a marine turtle population. Global Change Biol 13:923–932 (2007).
36.
Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ: Climate change and marine turtles. Endangered Species Res 7:137–154 (2009).
37.
Hays GC, Broderick AC, Glen F, Godley BJ: Climate change and sea turtles: a 150-year reconstruction of incubation temperatures at a major marine turtle rookery. Global Change Biol 9:642–646 (2003).
38.
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hughes H, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB, Parmesan C, et al: Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science 321:345–346 (2008).
39.
Hoekstra JM: Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23 (2005).
40.
Huey RB, Ward PD: Hypoxia, global warming, and terrestrial late Permian extinctions. Science 308:398–401 (2005).
41.
Hughes L: Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evol 15:56–61 (2000).
42.
Hulin V, Delmas V, Girondot M, Godfrey M, Guillon JM: Temperature-dependent sex determination and global change: are some species at greater risk? Oecologia 160:493–506 (2009).
43.
Ingvarsson PK: Restoration of genetic variation lost – the genetic rescue hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 16:62 (2001).
44.
IPCC – Summary for Policymakers: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007).
45.
IUCN 1994: IUCN Red List Categories (Gland, Switzerland 1994).
46.
Iverson JB: Life-history and demography of the yellow mud turtle, Kinosternon flavescens. Herpetologica 47:373–395 (1991).
47.
Janzen FJ: Heritable variation for sex-ratio under environmental sex determination in the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). Genetics 131:155–161 (1992).
48.
Janzen FJ: Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7487–7490 (1994).
49.
Janzen FJ: Sex determination in Chelydra, in Steyermark AC, Finkler MS, Brooks RJ (eds): Biology of the Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina), pp 146–157 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2008).
50.
Janzen FJ, Krenz JG: Which was first, TSD or GSD?, in Valenzuela N, Lance VA (eds): Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination in Vertebrates, pp 121–130 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington 2004).
51.
Janzen FJ, Morjan CL: Repeatability of microenvironment-specific nesting behaviour in a turtle with environmental sex determination. Anim Behav 63:73–82 (2001).
52.
Janzen FJ, Paukstis GL: Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution and experimental design. Quart Rev Biol 66:149–179 (1991).
53.
Kamel SJ, Mrosovsky N: Repeatability of nesting preferences in the hawksbill sea turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, and their fitness consequences. Anim Behav 70:819–828 (2005).
54.
Kamel SJ, Mrosovsky N: Deforestation: risk of sex ratio distortion in hawksbill sea turtles. Ecol Appl 16:923–931 (2006).
55.
Lance VA, Elsey RM, Lang JW: Sex ratios of American alligators (Crocodylidae): Male or female biased? J Zool 252:71–78 (2000).
56.
Le Galliard JF, Fitze PS, Ferrière R, Clobert J: Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18231–18236 (2005).
57.
Madsen T, Shine R, Olsson M, Wittzell H: Restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature 402:34–35 (1999).
58.
Miller D, Summers J, Silber S: Environmental versus genetic sex determination: a possible factor in dinosaur extinction? Fertil Steril 81:954–964 (2004).
59.
Mitchell NJ, Nelson NJ, Cree A, Pledger S, Keall SN, Daugherty CH: Support for a unique pattern of temperature-dependent sex determination in archaic reptiles: evidence from two species of tuatara (Sphenodon). Front Zool 3:9 (2006).
60.
Mitchell NJ, Kearney MR, Nelson NJ, Porter WP: Predicting the fate of a living fossil: how will global warming affect sex determination and hatching phenology in tuatara? Proc Biol Sci Ser B 275:2185–2193 (2008).
61.
Mitchell NJ, Allendorf FW, Keall SN, Daugherty CH, Nelson NJ: Demographic effects of temperature-dependent sex determination: will tuatara survive global warming? Global Change Biol 16:60–72 (2010).
62.
Morjan CL: How rapidly can maternal behaviour affecting primary sex ratio evolve in a reptile with environmental sex determination? Am Nat 162:205–219 (2003a).
63.
Morjan CL: Variation in nesting patterns affecting nest temperatures in two populations of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) with temperature-dependent sex determination. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:254–261 (2003b).
64.
Mrosovsky N, Provancha J: Sex ratios of hatchling loggerhead sea turtles: data and estimates from a 5-year study. Can J Zool 70:530–538 (1992).
65.
Nelson NJ, Keall SN, Pledger S, Daugherty CH: Male-biased sex ratio in a small tuatara population. J Biogeogr 29:633–640 (2002a).
66.
Nelson NJ, Keall SN, Brown D, Daugherty CH: Establishing a new wild population of tuatara (Sphenodon guntheri). Conserv Biol 16:887–894 (2002b).
67.
Nelson NJ, Thompson MB, Pledger S, Keall SN, Daugherty CLH: Induction of oviposition produces smaller eggs in tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). N Z J Zool 31:283–289 (2004).
68.
Nelson NJ, Moore J, Pillai S, Keall SN: Thermosensitive period for sex determination in tuatara. Herpetol Conserv Biol, in press.
69.
O’Grady JJ, Reed DH, Brook BW, Frankham R: What are the best correlates of predicted extinction risk? Biol Conserv 118:513 (2004).
70.
O’Grady JJ, Reed DH, Brook BW, Frankham R: Extinction risk scales better to generations than to years. Anim Conserv11:442–451 (2009).
71.
Pérez-Buitrago N, García MA, Sabat A, Delgado J, Álvarez A, et al: Do headstart programs work? Survival and body condition in headstarted Mona Island iguanas Cyclura cornuta stejnegeri. Endangered Species Res 6:55–65 (2008).
72.
Pimm SL, Dollar L, Bass OLJ: The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Anim Conserv 9:115–122 (2006).
73.
Pokorná M, Kratochvíl L: Phylogeny of sex-determining mechanisms in squamate reptiles: are sex chromosomes an evolutionary trap? Zool J Linn Soc 156:168–183 (2009).
74.
Pough FH, Andrews RM, Cadle JE, Crump ML, Savitsky AH, Wells KD: Herpetology, 3rd edition (Benjamin Cummings, Pearson 2004).
75.
Quinn AE, Georges A, Sarre SD, Guarino F, Ezez T, Graves JAM: Temperature sex reversal implies sex gene dosage in a reptile. Science 316:411 (2007).
76.
Radder RS, Quinn AE, Georges A, Sarre S, Shine R: Genetic evidence for co-occurrence of chromosomal and thermal sex-determining systems in a lizard. Biol Lett 4:176 (2008).
77.
Radder RS, Pike DA, Quinn AE, Shine R: Offspring sex in a lizard depends on egg size. Curr Biol 19:1–4 (2009).
78.
Ramanathan V, Feng Y: On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: formidable challenges ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14245–14250 (2008).
79.
Rankin DJ, Kokko H: Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics. Oikos 116:335–348 (2007).
80.
Reed DH, Frankham R: How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55:1095–1103 (2001).
81.
Rhen T, Lang JW: Among-family variation for environmental sex determination in reptiles. Evolution 52:1514–1520 (1998).
82.
Ricciardi A, Simberloff D: Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol Evol 24:248–253 (2009).
83.
Richardson DM, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan JS, Sax DF, Schwartz MW, et al: Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9721–9724 (2009).
84.
Sarre S: Mitochondrial DNA variation among populations of Oedura reticulata (Gekkonidae) in remnant vegetation: implications for metapopulation structure and population decline. Mol Ecol 4:395–406 (1995).
85.
Sarre SD, Georges A, Quinn A: The ends of a continuum: genetic and temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles. Bioessays 26:639–645 (2004).
86.
Schwanz LE, Janzen FJ: Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination: can individual plasticity in nesting phenology prevent extreme sex ratios? Physiol Biochem Zool 81:826–834 (2008).
87.
Schwanz LE, Spencer RJ, Bowden RM, Janzen FJ: Climate and predation dominate early life demography and adult recruitment in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination: insight from a long-term study. Ecology, in press (2010).
88.
Steffensen JP, Andersen KK, Bigler M, Clausen HB, Dahl-Jensen D, et al: High-resolution Greenland ice core data show abrupt climate change happens in few years. Science 321:680–684 (2008).
89.
Telemeco R, Elphick M, Shine R: Nesting lizards (Bassiana duperreyi) compensate partly, but not completely, for climate change. Ecology 90:17–22 (2009).
90.
Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, Deutsch CA: Putting the heat on tropical animals. Science 320:1296–1297 (2008).
91.
Tucker JK, Dolan CR, Lamer JT, Dustman EA: Climatic warming, sex ratios, and red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Illinois. Chelonian Conserv Biol 7:60–69 (2008).
92.
Uller T, Mott B, Odierna G, Olsson M: Consistent sex ratio bias of individual female dragon lizards. Biol Lett 22:569–572 (2006).
93.
Valenzuela N, Janzen FJ: Nest-site philopatry and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination. Evol Ecol Res 3:779–794 (2001).
94.
van Tienderen PH, de Haan AA, van der Linden CG, Vosman B: Biodiversity assessment using markers for ecologically important traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:577–582 (2002).
95.
Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, et al: Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395 (2002).
96.
Wapstra E, Uller T, Sinn D, Olsson M, Mazurek K, et al: Climate effects on offspring sex ratio in a viviparous lizard. J Anim Ecol 78:84–90 (2009).
97.
Wedekind C: Manipulating sex ratios for conservation: short-term risks and long-term benefits. Anim Conserv 5:13–20 (2002).
98.
Weishampel JF, Bagley DA, Ehrhart LM: Earlier nesting by loggerhead sea turtles following sea surface warming. Global Change Biol 10:1424–1457 (2004).
99.
Willette DA, Tucker JK, Janzen FJ: Linking climate and physiology at the population level for a key life-history stage of turtles. Can J Zool 83:845–850 (2005).
100.
Zhang F, Li Y, Guo Z, Murray BR: Climate warming and reproduction in Chinese alligators. Anim Conserv 12:128–137 (2009).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.