We characterized the ontogeny and dynamics of gonadal development, embryogenesis, and gestation in captive stocks of the viviparous redtail splitfin, Xenotoca eiseni. Using histology, we showed that gonads were fully differentiated at the time of birth with a male:female sex ratio of 1:1 in the captive stock. External secondary sex features included a modified anal fin and a distinctive orange tail coloration. These features first appeared at 4 weeks after birth and were discriminative for males thereafter. There was no sex-related dichotomy in body size, and X. eiseni reached sexual maturity at approximately 12 weeks of age. We found no evidence for sperm storage in females. Gestation normally took 6 weeks, and there was a positive correlation between female body size and the number of offspring produced, with up to 27 offspring for a single pregnancy. Yolk is the main food source for developing embryos for the period up to 2 weeks, and thereafter, trophotaeniae in embryos act as nutrient exchange surfaces in the ovarian lumen, which subsequently undergo complete regression within 2 weeks of birth. In our final analysis, we discuss the great potential of X. eiseni as a model for studying the effects of chemicals on sexual development.

Keywords:
Embryogenesis,, Gestation, Gonadal development, Viviparous fish, Xenotoca eiseni
1.
Alderton D: Livebearers: Understanding Guppies, Mollies, Swordtails and Others (CompanionHouse Books 2012).
2.
Ankley GT, Johnson RD: Small fish models for identifying and assessing the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. ILAR J 45:469-483 (2004).
3.
Bisazza A: Sexual selection constrained by internal fertilization in the livebearing fish Xenotoca eiseni. Anim Behav 54:1347-1355 (1997).
4.
Blackburn DG: Evolutionary origins of viviparity in fishes, in Grier HJ, Uribe MC (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 287-301 (New Life Publications, Homestead, Florida 2005).
5.
Chernyayev ZA: Morphological and ecological features of the reproduction and development of the ‘big golomyanka' or Baikal oil fish (Comephorus-baicalensis). J Ichthyol 14:856-868 (1974).
6.
Contreras-Balderas S: Fish viviparity: Diversity, biogeography and conservation, in Uribe MC, Grier HJ (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 31-39 (New Life Publications, Homestaed, Florida 2005).
7.
De la Vega-Salazar MY, Macías-García C: Principal factors in the decline of the Mexican endemic viviparous fishes (Goodeinae: Goodeidae), in Uribe MC, Grier HJ (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 505-513 (New Life Publications, Homestaed, Florida 2005).
8.
De La Vega Salazar MY, Tabche LM, García CM: Bioaccumulation of methyl parathion and its toxicology in several species of the freshwater community in Ignacio Ramirez dam in Mexico. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 38:53-62 (1997).
9.
Domínguez-Domínguez O, Mercado-Silva N, Lyons J, Grier H: The viviparous goodeid species, in Uribe MC, Grier HJ (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 525-569 (New Life Publications, Homestaed, Florida 2005).
10.
Domínguez-Domínguez O, Bernal-Zuñiga DM, Piller KR: Two new species of the genus Xenotoca Hubbs and Turner, 1939 (Teleostei, Goodeidae) from central-western Mexico. Zootaxa 4189:81-98 (2016).
11.
Fitzsimons JM: A revision of two genera of goodeid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Osteichthyes) from the Mexican plateau. Copeia 1972:728-756 (1972).
12.
Greven H: Zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Hochlandkärpflingen, in Kempkes M, Köck M, Stawikowski R (eds): Beiträge zur Biologie und zum Artenschutz der Hochlandkärpflinge: Goodeidae, pp 176-216 (Westarp Wissenschaften, Hohenwarsleben, Germany 2013).
13.
Grier HJ, Fitzsimons JM, Linton JR: Structure and ultrastructure of the testis and sperm formation in goodeid teleosts. J Morphol 156:419-437 (1978).
14.
Grier HJ, Uribe MC, Parenti LR, De la Rosa-Cruz G: Fecundity, the germinal epithelium, and folliculogenesis in viviparous fishes, in Uribe MC, Grier HJ (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 193-217 (New Life Publications, Homestaed, Florida 2005).
15.
Hoar WS: Reproduction, in Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds): Fish Physiol, vol 3, Reproduction and Growth Bioluminescence, Pigments, and Poisons, pp 1-72 (Academic Press, New York and London 1969).
16.
Hubbs CL, Turner CL: Studies of the fishes of the order Cyprinodontes. XVI. A Revision of the Goodeidae, Miscellaneous publications, vol. 42 pp 1-80 (Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 1939).
17.
Iida A, Nishimaki T, Sehara-Fujisawa A: Prenatal regression of the trophotaenial placenta in a viviparous fish, Xenotoca eiseni. Sci Rep 5:7855 (2015).
18.
Knight FM, Lombardi J, Wourms JP, Burns JR: Follicular placenta and embryonic growth of the viviparous four-eyed fish (Anableps). J Morphol 185:131-142 (1985).
19.
Koeck M: Xenotoca eiseni. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T191717A2000040, (2019). Accessed March 08, 2020.
20.
Korsgaard B, Petersen I: Vitellogenin, lipid and carbohydrate-metabolism during vitellogenesis and pregnancy, and after hormonal induction in the blenny Zoarces-viviparus (L). Comp Biochem Phys B 63:245-251 (1979).
21.
Korsgaard B, Andreassen TK, Rasmussen TH: Effects of an environmental estrogen, 17α-ethinyl-estradiol, on the maternal-fetal trophic relationship in the eelpout Zoarces viviparus (L). Mar Environ Res 54:735-739 (2002).
22.
Kristoffersson R, Broberg S, Pekkarinen M: Histology and physiology of embryotrophe formation embryonic nutrition and growth in the eelpout Zoarces viviparus. Ann Zool Fenn 10:467-477 (1973).
23.
Love MS, Yoklavich M, Thorsteinson LK: The Rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific (University of California Press, Los Angeles 2002).
24.
Lyons J, Piller KR, Artigas-Azas JM, Dominguez-Dominguez O, Gesundheit P, et al: Distribution and current conservation status of the Mexican Goodeidae (Actinopterygii, Cyprinodontiformes). ZooKeys 885:115-158 (2019).
25.
Macıas Garcia C, Valero A: Sexual conflict and sexual selection in the Goodeinae, a clade of viviparous fish with effective female mate choice. Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 42, pp 1-54 (Academic Press, 2010).
26.
Mead GW, Bertelsen E, Cohen DM: Reproduction among deep-sea fishes. Deep-Sea Res 11:569-596 (1964).
27.
Meisner AD, Burns JR: Viviparity in the halfbeak genera Dermogenys and Nomorhamphus (Teleostei: Hemiramphidae). J Morphol 234:295-317 (1997).
28.
Mendoza G: The reproductive cycle of the viviparous teleost, Neotoca bilineata, a member of the family Goodeidae. III. The germ cell cycle. Biol Bull 81:70-79 (1941).
29.
Mendoza G: The reproductive cycle of the viviparous teleost, Neotoca bilineata, a member of the family Goodeidae. IV. The germinal tissue. Biol Bull 84:87-97 (1943).
30.
Mendoza G: The ovary and anal processes of ‘Characodon' eiseni, a viviparous cyprinodont teleost from Mexico. Biol Bull 129:303-315 (1965).
31.
Mendoza G: The fine structure of an absorptive epithelium in a viviparous teleost. J Morphol 136:109-129 (1972).
32.
Meyer A, Lydeard C: The evolution of copulatory organs, internal fertilization, placentae and viviparity in killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes) inferred from a DNA phylogeny of the tyrosine kinase gene X-src. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 254:153-162 (1993).
33.
Miller RR, Fitzsimons JM: Ameca splendens, a new genus and species of Goodeid fish from Western Mexico, with remarks on the classification of the Goodeidae. Copeia 1971:1-13 (1971).
34.
Nelson JS: Fishes of the World, ed 4 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey 2006).
35.
Parenti LR: A phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of cyprinodontiform fishes (Teleostei, Atherinomorpha). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 168, 4:335-557 (1981).
36.
Schindler JF: Retrograde trafficking of tracer protein by the internal ovarian epithelium in gravid goodeid teleosts. Anat Rec 226:177-186 (1990).
37.
Schindler JF: Structure and function of placental exchange surfaces in goodeid fishes (Teleostei: Atheriniformes). J Morphol 276:991-1003 (2015).
38.
Schindler JF, de Vries U: Maternal embryonic relationships in the goodeid teleost Xenoophorus captivus - Embryonic structural adaptations of viviparity. Cell Tissue Res 247:325-338 (1987).
39.
Schindler JF, de Vries U: Maternal embryonic relationships in the goodeid teleost, Xenoophorus captivus - The vacuolar apparatus in trophotaenial absorptive cells and its role in macromolecular transport. Cell Tissue Res 253:115-128 (1988).
40.
Schnorr B, Kressin M: Embryologie der Haustiere (Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany 2011).
41.
Skov PV, Steffensen JF, Sørensen TF, Qvortrup K: Embryonic suckling and maternal specializations in the live-bearing teleost Zoarces viviparus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 395:120-127 (2010).
42.
Turner CL: Viviparity superimposed upon ovo-viviparity in the Goodeidae, a family of Cyprinodont teleost fishes of the Mexican Plateau. J Morphol 55:207-251 (1933).
43.
Turner CL: The absorptive processes in the embryos of Parabrotula dentiens, a viviparous, deep-sea Brotulid fish. J Morphol 59:313-325 (1936).
44.
Turner CL: The trophotaeniae of the Goodeidae, a family of viviparous cyprinodont fishes. J Morphol 61:495-523 (1937).
45.
Tyler CR, Sumpter JP: Oocyte growth and development in teleosts. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 6:287-318 (1996).
46.
Tyler CR, Jobling S, Sumpter JP: Endocrine disruption in wildlife: a critical review of the evidence. Crit Rev Toxicol 28:319-361 (1998).
47.
Uribe Aranzábal MC, De la Rosa Cruz G, García Alarcón A, Guerrero-Estévez SM, Aguilar Morales M: Histological features of atretic stages of the ovarian follicles of two viviparous teleost species: llyodon whitei (Meek, 1904) and Goodea atripinnis (Jordan, 1880) (Goodeidae). Hidrobiológica 16:67-73 (2006).
48.
Uribe MC, Grier HJ: Oogenesis of microlecithal oocytes in the viviparous teleost Heterandria formosa. J Morphol 272:241-257 (2011).
49.
Uribe MC, De la Rosa-Cruz G, García-Alarcón A: The ovary of viviparous teleost. Morphological differences between the ovaries of Goodea atripinnis and Ilyodon whitei (Goodeidae), in Uribe MC, Grier HJ (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 217-235 (New Life Publications, Homestaed, Florida 2005).
50.
Uribe MC, Grier HJ, Parenti LR: Ovarian structure and oogenesis of the oviparous goodeids Crenichthys baileyi (Gilbert, 1893) and Empetrichthys latos Miller, 1948 (Teleostei, Cyprinodontiformes). J Morphol 273:371-387 (2012).
51.
Uribe MC, De la Rosa-Cruz G, Garcia-Alarcon A: Branchial placenta in the viviparous teleost Ilyodon whitei (Goodeidae). J Morphol 275:1406-1417 (2014).
52.
Webb S: A phylogenetic analysis of the Goodeidae (Teleostei: Cyprinodontiformes), p 280 (University of Michigan, 1998).
53.
Wootton RJ, Smith C: Reproductive Biology of Teleost Fishes, (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK 2014).
54.
Wourms JP: Viviparity - The maternal-fetal relationship in fishes. Am Zool 21:473-515 (1981).
55.
Wourms JP: Functional morphology, development, and evolution of trophotaeniae, in Uribe MC. Grier HJ (eds): Viviparous Fishes, pp 238-262 (New Life Publications, Homestaed, Florida 2005).
56.
Wourms J, Lombardi J: Convergent evolution of trophotaeniae and other gut derived embryonic adaptations in viviparous teleosts. Proc 59th Ann Meeting Amer Soc Ichthyol and Herpet, Vol 59, p 94 (1979).
57.
Wourms JP, Lombardi J: Reflections on the evolution of piscine viviparity. Am Zool 32:276-293 (1992).
58.
Wourms JP, Grove BD, Lombardi J: The maternal-embryonic relationship in viviparous fishes, in Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds): Fish Physiology - The Physiology of Developing Fish — Viviparity and Posthatching Juveniles, Vol 11, Part B, pp 1-134 (Academic Press, San Diego 1988).
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel
2020
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.