The accuracy of computerized cell image analysis techniques for classification of atypical cells is determined by comparing computer-generated classifications with those made by cytopathologists. This measure of accuracy depends not only on the reliability of the computer classifications but also on the reliability of the cytopathologists’ classifications. This study reports on the observed reliability of cytopathologists’ classifications of squamous epithelial atypias in sputum across cytopathologists and two different classification times. Results indicated the percentage agreement among cytopathologists and computerized cell image analysis techniques. It is recommended that, in the future, all analyses of computerized classification schemes by interpreted in light of the consistency of the cytopathologists’ classifications.

This content is only available via PDF.
© 1987 S. Karger AG, Basel
1987
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.