Background: Although very common in our society, the effect of hair removal on physiological skin parameters and on the ingress of applied chemicals has not been systematically investigated. Thus, as a first step, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of hair removal through epilation (electric epilation, waxing) and depilation (dry and wet shaving, depilatory cream) on skin properties in vitro using the porcine ear model. Methods: Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, measurement of the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), visualization by capacitance-based contact imaging, confocal Raman spectroscopy (CRS), diffusion cell studies and tape stripping experiments were employed. Results: Increased TEWL and altered skin permittivity maps were observed. Decreased stratum corneum thickness was observed after waxing. Diffusion cell studies showed increased skin permeation especially in case of dry shaving, electric epilation and waxing. Conclusion: Considering CRS and diffusion cell data, a moderate if significant decrease in skin barrier function was found after hair removal by dry shaving (physical skin/material interaction) and epilation methods (plucking out the entire hair, for example, by electrical epilation and waxing). Subsequent experiments will include testing of different permeants covering a broad range of physicochemical properties in vitro and confirming our findings in vivo.

Keywords:
Damaged skin, Skin barrier function, Hair removal, Skin/material interaction, Shaving
1.
Hadgraft J: Skin, the final frontier. Int J Pharm 2001; 224: 1–18.
2.
Tiggemann M, Kenyon SJ: The hairlessness norm: the removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles 1998; 39: 873–885.
3.
Toerien M, Wilkinson S, Choi PYL: Body hair removal: the “mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles 2005; 52: 399–406.
4.
Tiggemann M, Hodgson S: The hairlessness norm extended: Reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles 2008; 59: 889–897.
5.
Martins Y, Tiggemann M, Churchett L: Hair today, gone tomorrow: a comparison of body hair removal practices in gay and heterosexual men. Body Image 2008; 5: 312–316.
6.
Boroughs M, Cafri G, Thompson JK: Male body depilation: prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles 2005; 52: 637–644.
7.
Marti VP, Lee RS, Moore AE, Paterson SE, Watkinson A, Rawlings AV: Effect of shaving on axillary stratum corneum. Int J Cosmet Sci 2003; 25: 193–198.
8.
Turner GA, Moore AE, Marti VP, Paterson SE, James AG: Impact of shaving and anti-perspirant use on the axillary vault. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007; 29: 31–38.
9.
Lucová M, Hojerová J, Pažoureková S, Klimová Z: Absorption of triphenylmethane dyes Brilliant Blue and Patent Blue through intact skin, shaven skin and lingual mucosa from daily life products. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 52: 19–27.
10.
Hojerová J, Peráčková Z, Beránková M: Margin of safety for two UV filters estimated by in vitro permeation studies mimicking consumer habits: effects of skin shaving and sunscreen reapplication. Food Chem Toxicol 2017; 103: 66–78.
11.
Hamza M, Tohid H, Maibach H: Shaving effects on percutaneous penetration: clinical implications. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2015; 34: 335–343.
12.
Sekkat N, Kalia YN, Guy RH: Biophysical study of porcine ear skin in vitro and its comparison to human skin in vivo. J Pharm Sci 2002; 91: 2376–2381.
13.
Jacobi U, Kaiser M, Toll R, Mangelsdorf S, Audring H, Otberg N, et al: Porcine ear skin: an in vitro model for human skin. Ski Res Technol 2007; 13: 19–24.
14.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Lenobel B, Nadj M, Auböck J, Wolzt M, et al: In vitro vs. in vivo tape stripping: validation of the porcine ear model and penetration assessment of novel sucrose stearate emulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2012; 80: 604–614.
15.
Boncheva M, Damien F, Normand V: Molecular organization of the lipid matrix in intact Stratum corneum using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1778: 1344–1355.
16.
Hasanovic A, Winkler R, Resch GP, Valenta C: Modification of the conformational skin structure by treatment with liposomal formulations and its correlation to the penetration depth of aciclovir. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011; 79: 76–81.
17.
Egawa M, Hirao T, Takahashi M: In vivo estimation of stratum corneum thickness from water concentration profiles obtained with raman spectroscopy. Acta Derm Venereol 2007; 87: 4–8.
18.
Binder L, SheikhRezaei S, Baierl A, Gruber L, Wolzt M, Valenta C: Confocal Raman spectroscopy: in vivo measurement of physiological skin parameters – a pilot study. J Dermatol Sci 2017; 88: 280–288.
19.
Mahrhauser DS, Nagelreiter C, Gehrig S, Geyer A, Ogris M, Kwizda K, et al: Assessment of Raman spectroscopy as a fast and non-invasive method for total stratum corneum thickness determination of pig skin. Int J Pharm 2015; 495: 482–484.
20.
Heinrich K, Heinrich U, Tronnier H: Influence of different cosmetic formulations on the human skin barrier. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 27: 141–147.
21.
Kottner J, Ludriksone L, Garcia Bartels N, Blume-Peytavi U: Do repeated skin barrier measurements influence each other’s results? An explorative study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 27: 90–96.
22.
Dey S, Rothe H, Page L, O’Connor R, Farahmand S, Toner F, et al: An in vitro skin penetration model for compromised skin: estimating penetration of polyethylene glycol [14C]-PEG-7 phosphate. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2015; 28: 12–21.
23.
Sekkat N, Kalia YN, Guy RH: Porcine ear skin as a model for the assessment of transdermal drug delivery to premature neonates. Pharm Res 2004; 21: 1390–1397.
24.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Haberfeld S, Xiao P, Wirth M, Valenta C: Skin integrity testing and monitoring of in vitro tape stripping by capacitance-based sensor imaging. Ski Res Technol 2013; 19:e259–e272.
25.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Lenobel B, Nadj M, Auböck J, Wolzt M, et al: In vitro vs. in vivo tape stripping: validation of the porcine ear model and penetration assessment of novel sucrose stearate emulsions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2012; 80: 604–614.
26.
Schwarz JC, Klang V, Hoppel M, Wolzt M, Valenta C: Corneocyte quantification by NIR densitometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy for human and porcine skin and the role of skin cleaning procedures. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 142–149.
27.
Nagelreiter C, Mahrhauser D, Wiatschka K, Skipiol S, Valenta C: Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment. Int J Pharm 2015; 491: 162–169.
28.
Yoshihara T, Shimada K, Momoi Y, Konno K, Iwasaki T: A new method of measuring the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) of dog skin. J Vet Med Sci 2007; 69: 289–292.
29.
Hoppel M, Baurecht D, Holper E, Mahrhauser D, Valenta C: Validation of the combined ATR-FTIR/tape stripping technique for monitoring the distribution of surfactants in the stratum corneum. Int J Pharm 2014; 472: 88–93.
30.
Hathout RM, Mansour S, Mortada ND, Geneidi AS, Guy RH: Uptake of microemulsion components into the stratum corneum and their molecular effects on skin barrier function. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1266–1273.
31.
Warner RR, Myers MC, Taylor DA: Electron probe analysis of human skin: determination of the water concentration profile. J Invest Dermatol 1988; 90: 218–224.
32.
Klang V, Schwarz JC, Hartl A, Valenta C: Facilitating in vitro tape stripping: application of infrared densitometry for quantification of porcine stratum corneum proteins. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011; 24: 256–268.
33.
Franzen L, Windbergs M, Hansen S: Assessment of near-infrared densitometry for in situ determination of the total stratum corneum thickness on pig skin: influence of storage time. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 249–256.
34.
Herkenne C, Naik A, Kalia YN, Hadgraft J, Guy RH: Pig ear skin ex vivo as a model for in vivo dermatopharmacokinetic studies in man. Pharm Res 2006; 23: 1850–1856.
35.
Klang V, Hoppel M, Valenta C: Infrared densitometry for in vitro tape stripping: quantification of porcine corneocytes; in Humbert P, Maibach H, Fanian F, Agache P (eds): Measuring the Skin. Cham, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2015.
36.
Chilcott RP, Dalton CH, Emmanuel AJ, Allen CE, Bradley ST: Transepidermal water loss does not correlate with skin barrier function in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 118: 871–875.
37.
Fluhr JW, Feingold KR, Elias PM: Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barrier status: Validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models. Exp Dermatol 2006; 15: 483–492.
38.
Czaika V, Alborova A, Richter H, Sterry W, Vergou T, Antoniou C, et al: Comparison of transepidermal water loss and laser scanning microscopy measurements to assess their value in the characterization of cutaneous barrier defects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012; 25: 39–46.
39.
Klimisch HM, Chandra G: Use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance for in vivo quantitation of polydimethylsiloxanes on human skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1985; 37: 73–87.
40.
Förster M, Bolzinger MA, Rovere MR, Damour O, Montagnac G, Briançon S: Confocal raman microspectroscopy for evaluating the stratum corneum removal by 3 standard methods. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011; 24: 103–112.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.