Background/Aims: Silicone excipients are commonly used ingredients because of their emollient and skin-conditioning effects, and their ability to form uniform, water-resistant, yet permeable films. Based on comparisons with organic materials and conflicting knowledge from silicones used in scar treatment, the misconception still exists that silicone topical excipients are occlusive substances that may block the passive loss of water through the upper skin layers. Therefore, 3 types of common silicone excipients and 3 water-in-(oil-plus-silicone) or W/(O + Si) creams, containing 10% (w/w) of the respective silicones, were investigated as a function of time and compared to petrolatum. Methods: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration measurements were carried out after a single topical application on forearm skin of 26 healthy young female volunteers. Results: Both petrolatum and silicones significantly decreased TEWL 15 min after application, but the measurements for the silicones were not significantly different from the untreated control values. The tested silicones did not moisturize the skin. Petrolatum formed an occlusive layer, creating an increase in skin hydration for more than 4 h. The results measured for the W/(O + Si) creams indicated that they moisturized the skin, without any effect on TEWL. Conclusion: A clear difference was shown between the skin occlusive properties of petrolatum and the water vapor permeability of the common silicone excipient materials.

Keywords:
Dimethicone, Dimethiconol, Dimethicone crosspolymer , Occlusivity, Forearm skin test model, Biophysical measurements, Transepidermal water loss, Skin hydration
1.
Van Reeth I, Wilson A: Understanding factors which influence permeability of silicones and their derivatives. Cosmet Toilet 1994;109:87-92.
2.
Colas A: Introduction to silicone chemistry, part of the chapter ‘Silicones in industrial applications'; in De Jaeger R, Gleria M (eds): Inorganic Polymers. Hauppauge, Nova Science Publishers, 2007, pp 61-161.
3.
Garaud JL: Silicones in personal care applications, part of the chapter ‘Silicones in industrial applications'; in De Jaeger R, Gleria M (eds): Inorganic Polymers. Hauppauge, Nova Science Publishers, 2007, pp 61-161.
4.
Mustoe TA: Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesth Plast Surg 2008;32:82-92.
5.
Glombitza B, Müller-Goymann CC: Investigation of interactions between silicones and stratum corneum lipids. Int J Cosmet Sci 2001;23:25-34.
6.
Owen MJ: Why silicones behave funny. Chim Nouv 2004;22:27-33.
7.
Kraft JN, Lynde CW: Moisturizers: what they are and a practical approach to product selection. Skin Ther Lett 2005;10:1-8.
8.
Disapio A, Fridd P: Silicones: use of substantive properties on skin and hair. Int J Cosmet Sci 1988;10:75-89.
9.
Short RW, Chan JL, Choi JM, Egbert BM, Rehmus WE, Kimball AB: Effects of moisturization on epidermal homeostasis and differentiation. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007;32:88-90.
10.
Pharmaceutical excipients online. 2012. http://www.medicinescomplete.com (accessed March 3, 2012).
11.
Lanzet M: Comedogenic effects of cosmetic raw materials. Cosmet Toilet 1986;101:63-72.
12.
Van Reeth I: Silicones - a key ingredient in cosmetic and toiletry formulations; in Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI (eds): Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, ed 3. London, Informa Healthcare, 2009, pp 371-380.
13.
Powell V, Thimineur R: New developments in alkyl silicones. Cosmet Toilet 1993;108:87-93.
14.
Zhai H, Brachman F, Pelosi A, Anigbogu A, Ramos MB, Torralba MC, Maibach HI: A bioengineering study on the efficacy of a skin protectant lotion in preventing SLS-induced dermatitis. Skin Res Dermatol 2000;6:77-80.
15.
Buraczewska I, Broström U, Lodén M: Artificial reduction in transepidermal water loss improves skin barrier function. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:82-86.
16.
Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Verhaeghe S, Heyneman A, Defloor T: Prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: literature review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1141-1154.
17.
Beeckman D, Verhaeghe S, Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Vanderwee K: A 3-in-1 perineal care washcloth impregnated with dimethicone 3% versus water and pH neutral soap to prevent and treat incontinence-associated dermatitis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurse 2011;38:627-634.
18.
Hoggarth A, Waring M, Alexander J, Greenwood A, Callaghan T: A controlled, three-part trial to investigate the barrier function and skin hydration properties of six skin protectants. Ostomy Wound Manage 2005;51:30-42.
19.
Flynn TC, Petros J, Clark RE, Viehman GE: Dry skin and moisturizers. Clin Dermatol 2001;19:387-392.
20.
Berman B, Perez OA, Konda S, Kohut BE, Viera MH, Delgado S, Zell D, Li Q: A review of the biologic effects, clinical efficacy, and safety of silicone elastomer sheeting for hypertrophic and keloid scar treatment and management. Dermatol Surg 2007;33:1291-1303.
21.
Morrison DS: Petrolatum: a useful classic. Cosmet Toilet 1996;111:59-69.
22.
Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P: Petrolatum prevents irritation in a human cumulative exposure model in vivo. Dermatology 1997;194:247-250.
23.
Lodén M: The clinical benefit of moisturizers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2005;19:672-688.
24.
Ghadially R, Halkier-Sorensen L, Elias PM: Effects of petrolatum on stratum corneum structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26:387-396.
25.
Stamatas GN, de Sterke J, Hauser M, von Stetten O, van der Pol A: Lipid uptake and skin occlusion following topical application of oils on adult and infant skin. J Dermatol Sci 2008;50:135-142.
26.
Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM: The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol 2008;17:1063-1072.
27.
Visscher MO, Barai N, LaRuffa AA, Pickens WL, Narendran V, Hoath SB: Epidermal barrier treatments based on vernix caseosa. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2011;24:322-329.
28.
Wilson D, Berardesca E, Maibach HI: In vivo transepidermal water loss and skin surface hydration in assessment of moisturization and soap effects. Int J Cosmet Sci 1988;10:201-211.
29.
De Paepe K, Rogiers V: Glycerol as humectant in cosmetic formulations; in Rawlings AV, Leyden JJ (eds): Skin Moisturization, ed 2. London, Informa Healthcare, 2009, pp 279-294.
30.
Wiedersberg S, Leopold CS, Guy RH: Effects of various vehicles on skin hydration in vivo. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:128-130.
31.
Nair B, Cosmetic Ingredients Review Expert Panel: Final report on the safety assessment of stearoxy dimethicone, dimethicone, methicone, amino bispropyl dimethicone, aminopropyl dimethicone, amodimethicone, amodimethicone hydroxystearate, behenoxy dimethicone, C24-28 alkyl methicone, C30-45 alkyl methicone, C30-45 alkyl dimethicone, cetearyl methicone, cetyl dimethicone, dimethoxysilyl ethylenediaminopropyl dimethicone, hexyl methicone, hydroxypropyldimethicone, stearamidopropyl dimethicone, stearyl dimethicone, stearyl methicone, and vinyldimethicone. Int J Toxicol 2003;22(suppl 2):11-35.
32.
Lambert J: Silicone safety and the cosmetic industry. Cosmet Toilet 2011;126:810-815.
33.
Rowe VK, Spencer HC, Bass SL: Toxicological studies on certain commercial silicones and hydrolyzable silane intermediates. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1948;30:332-352.
34.
Berardesca E: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1997;3:126-132.
35.
Rogiers V, EEMCO Group: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001;14:117-128.
36.
Imhof RE, De Jesus MEP, Xiao P, Ciortea LI, Berg EP: Closed-chamber transepidermal water loss measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance. Int J Cosmet Sci 2009;31:97-118.
37.
Kleesz P, Darlenski R, Fluhr JW: Full-body skin mapping for six biophysical parameters: baseline values at 16 anatomical sites in 125 human subjects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012;25:25-33.
38.
Lodén M: The increase in skin hydration after application of emollients with different amounts of lipids. Acta Derm Venereol 1992;72:327-330.
39.
Farahmand S, Tien L, Hui X, Maibach HI: Measuring transepidermal water loss: a comparative in vivo study of condenser-chamber, unventilated-chamber and open-chamber systems. Skin Res Technol 2009;15:392-398.
40.
Courage W: Hardware and measuring principle: corneometer; in Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach H (eds): Bioengineering of the Skin. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1994, pp 171-175.
41.
Lodén M, Lindberg M: The influence of a single application of different moisturizers on the skin capacitance. Acta Derm Venereol 1991;71:79-82.
42.
Li F, Conroy E, Visscher M, Wickett RR: The ability of electrical measurements to predict skin moisturization. II. Correlation between one-hour measurements and long term results. J Cosmet Sci 2001;52:23-33.
43.
Wickett RR: The evolution of skin measurement technology. IFSCC Chronicle 2009;12:173-175.
44.
Courage & Khazaka Electronic GmbH: Manual Corneometer® CM825. 2010. http://www.courage-khazaka.de/products/p_cm_825.htm (accessed February 12, 2012).
45.
Marques JPP, Basso DSB, Nunes AS: A new technique associated with the evaporimetry method for evaluating occlusion. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007;29:97-102.
46.
Wiedersberg S, Leopold CS, Guy RH: Dermatopharmacokinetics of betamethasone 17-valerate: influence of formulation viscosity and skin surface cleaning procedure. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009;71:362-366.
47.
Fluhr JW, Gloor M, Lehmann L, Lazzerini S, Distante F, Berardesca E: Glycerol accelerates recovery of barrier function in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol 1999;79:418-421.
48.
De Paepe K, Wibaux A, Ward C, Rogiers V: Skin efficacy and biophysical assessment of glycerol-containing hydrocolloid patches. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:258-265.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.