Introduction: DBS efficacy depends on accuracy. CT-MRI fusion is established for both stereotactic registration and electrode placement verification. The desire to streamline DBS workflows, reduce operative time, and minimize patient transfers has increased interest in portable imaging modalities such as the Medtronic O-arm® and mobile CT. However, these remain expensive and bulky. 3D C-arm fluoroscopy (3DXT) units are a smaller and less costly alternative, albeit incompatible with traditional frame-based localization and without useful soft tissue resolution. We aimed to compare fusion of 3DXT and CT with pre-operative MRI to evaluate if 3DXT-MRI fusion alone is sufficient for accurate registration and reliable targeting verification. We further assess DBS targeting accuracy using a 3DXT workflow and compare radiation dosimetry between modalities. Methods: Patients underwent robot-assisted DBS implantation using a workflow incorporating 3DXT which we describe. Two intra-operative 3DXT spins were performed for registration and accuracy verification followed by conventional CT post-operatively. Post-operative 3DXT and CT images were independently fused to the same pre-operative MRI sequence and co-ordinates generated for comparison. Registration accuracy was compared to 15 consecutive controls who underwent CT-based registration. Radial targeting accuracy was calculated and radiation dosimetry recorded. Results: Data were obtained from 29 leads in 15 consecutive patients. 3DXT registration accuracy was significantly superior to CT with mean error 0.22 ± 0.03 mm (p < 0.0001). Mean Euclidean electrode tip position variation for CT to MRI versus 3DXT to MRI fusion was 0.62 ± 0.40 mm (range 0.0 mm–1.7 mm). In comparison, direct CT to 3DXT fusion showed electrode tip Euclidean variance of 0.23 ± 0.09 mm. Mean radial targeting accuracy assessed on 3DXT was 0.97 ± 0.54 mm versus 1.15 ± 0.55 mm on CT with differences insignificant (p = 0.30). Mean patient radiation doses were around 80% lower with 3DXT versus CT (p < 0.0001). Discussion: Mobile 3D C-arm fluoroscopy can be safely incorporated into DBS workflows for both registration and lead verification. For registration, the limited field of view requires the use of frameless transient fiducials and is highly accurate. For lead position verification based on MRI co-registration, we estimate there is around a 0.4 mm discrepancy between lead position seen on 3DXT versus CT when corrected for brain shift. This is similar to that described in O-arm® or mobile CT series. For units where logistical or financial considerations preclude the acquisition of a cone beam CT or mobile CT scanner, our data support portable 3D C-arm fluoroscopy as an acceptable alternative with significantly lower radiation exposure.

1.
Mirzadeh
Z
,
Chapple
K
,
Lambert
M
,
Dhall
R
,
Ponce
FA
.
Validation of CT-MRI fusion for intraoperative assessment of stereotactic accuracy in DBS surgery
.
Mov Disord
.
2014
;
29
(
14
):
1788
95
. doi: .
2.
Bot
M
,
Van Den Munckhof
P
,
Bakay
R
,
Stebbins
G
,
Verhagen Metman
L
.
Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography during deep brain stimulation procedures: comparison with postoperative magnetic resonance imaging
.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
.
2017
;
95
(
3
):
183
8
. doi: .
3.
Furlanetti
L
,
Hasegawa
H
,
Oviedova
A
,
Raslan
A
,
Samuel
M
,
Selway
R
, et al
.
O-arm stereotactic imaging in deep brain stimulation surgery workflow: a utility and cost-effectiveness analysis
.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
.
2021
;
99
(
2
):
93
106
. doi: .
4.
Peng
T
,
Kramer
DR
,
Lee
MB
,
Barbaro
MF
,
Ding
L
,
Liu
CY
, et al
.
Comparison of intraoperative 3-dimensional fluoroscopy with standard computed tomography for stereotactic frame registration
.
Oper Neurosurg
.
2020
;
18
(
6
):
698
709
. doi: .
5.
Holloway
K
,
Docef
A
.
A quantitative assessment of the accuracy and reliability of O-arm images for deep brain stimulation surgery
.
Neurosurgery
.
2013
;
72
(
1 Suppl Operative
):
47
57
. doi: .
6.
Carlson
JD
,
McLeod
KE
,
McLeod
PS
,
Mark
JB
.
Stereotactic accuracy and surgical utility of the O-arm in deep brain stimulation surgery
.
Oper Neurosurg
.
2017
;
13
(
1
):
96
107
. doi: .
7.
Malham
GM
,
Wells-Quinn
T
.
What should my hospital buy next?—guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery
.
J Spine Surg
.
2019
;
5
(
1
):
155
65
. doi: .
8.
Hines
K
,
Matias
CM
,
Leibold
A
,
Sharan
A
,
Wu
C
.
Accuracy and efficiency using frameless transient fiducial registration in stereoelectroencephalography and deep brain stimulation
.
J Neurosurg
.
2022
;
138
(
2
):
299
305
. doi: .
9.
Manfield
J
,
Thomas
S
,
Antoniades
C
,
Green
A
,
Fitzgerald
J
.
High resolution photon counting CT permits direct visualisation of directional deep brain stimulation lead segments and markers
.
Brain Stimul
.
2023
;
16
(
5
):
1276
77
. doi: .
10.
Moran
C
,
Sarangmat
N
,
Gerard
CS
,
Barua
N
,
Ashida
R
,
Woolley
M
, et al
.
Two hundred twenty-six consecutive deep brain stimulation electrodes placed using an “asleep” technique and the Neuro| MateTM robot for the treatment of movement disorders
.
Oper Neurosurg
.
2020
;
19
(
5
):
530
8
. doi: .
11.
Li
Z
,
Zhang
J-G
,
Ye
Y
,
Li
X
.
Review on factors affecting targeting accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode implantation between 2001 and 2015
.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
.
2016
;
94
(
6
):
351
62
. doi: .
12.
McCollough
C
,
Cody
D
,
Edyvean
S
,
Geise
R
,
Gould
B
,
Keat
N
, et al
.
The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT
.
Report AAPM Task Group
.
2008
;
23
(
23
):
1
28
.
13.
Shrimpton
PC
,
Jansen
JTM
,
Harrison
JD
.
Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review
.
Br J Radiol
.
2016
;
89
(
1057
):
20150346
. doi: .
14.
Servello
D
,
Zekaj
E
,
Saleh
C
,
Pacchetti
C
,
Porta
M
.
The pros and cons of intraoperative CT scan in evaluation of deep brain stimulation lead implantation: a retrospective study
.
Surg Neurol Int
.
2016
;
7
(
Suppl 19
):
S551
6
. doi: .
15.
Bower
KL
,
Noecker
AM
,
Reich
MM
,
McIntyre
CC
.
Quantifying the variability associated with postoperative localization of deep brain stimulation electrodes
.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
.
2023
;
101
(
4
):
277
84
. doi: .
16.
Geevarghese
R
,
O'Gorman Tuura
R
,
Lumsden
DE
,
Samuel
M
,
Ashkan
K
.
Registration accuracy of CT/MRI fusion for localisation of deep brain stimulation electrode position: an imaging study and systematic review
.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
.
2016
;
94
(
3
):
159
63
. doi: .
17.
Neudorfer
C
,
Hunsche
S
,
Hellmich
M
,
El Majdoub
F
,
Maarouf
M
.
Comparative study of robot-assisted versus conventional frame-based deep brain stimulation stereotactic neurosurgery
.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
.
2018
;
96
(
5
):
327
34
. doi: .
18.
Philipp
LR
,
Matias
CM
,
Thalheimer
S
,
Mehta
SH
,
Sharan
A
,
Wu
C
.
Robot-assisted stereotaxy reduces target error: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of 6056 trajectories
.
Neurosurgery
.
2021
;
88
(
2
):
222
33
. doi: .
19.
Cavalcante
D
,
Ghauri
MS
,
Gwinn
R
.
Deep brain stimulation surgery using a mobile intraoperative CT scanner
.
Cureus
.
2022
;
14
(
9
):
e29139
. doi: .
20.
Moran
CH
,
Pietrzyk
M
,
Sarangmat
N
,
Gerard
CS
,
Barua
N
,
Ashida
R
, et al
.
Clinical outcome of “asleep” deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease using robot-assisted delivery and anatomic targeting of the subthalamic nucleus: a series of 152 patients
.
Neurosurgery
.
2020
;
88
(
1
):
165
73
. doi: .
21.
Wall
BF
.
Ionising radiation exposure of the population of the United States: NCRP Report No. 160
.
Oxford University Press
;
2009
.
22.
Rousseau
J
,
Dreuil
S
,
Bassinet
C
,
Cao
S
,
Elleaume
H
.
Surgivisio® and O-arm® O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: comparison of patient radiation dose
.
Phys Med
.
2021
;
85
:
192
9
. doi: .
You do not currently have access to this content.