Background: In neuromodulation therapies, hardware-related infections are a major challenge often leading to hardware removal. Objective: To investigate the role of adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in hardware-related infections. Methods: Fourteen hardware-related infection events in 12 consecutive patients between 2002 and 2015 were treated with antibiotics and adjuvant HBOT at the Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Two time-independent infection events related to hardware replacements occurred in 2 patients. Infection resolution and the need for hardware removal were assessed. Results: Twelve out of 14 events of hardware-related infection were successfully treated without hardware removal (86%). The 2 patients treated twice with HBOT on 2 time-independent occasions could retain their hardware in both cases. Hardware was removed following HBOT failure in 2 infection events, with long-term infection control achieved in all patients. Further, an intrathecal pump malfunction caused by HBOT at 2.8 bars was observed, leading to a change in the manufacturer’s guidelines. Conclusions: This study indicates a potential benefit of adjuvant HBOT in the treatment of hardware-related infections in neuromodulation, diminishing the need for hardware removal and treatment interruption. Prospective studies are warranted to establish the role of adjuvant HBOT in the treatment of hardware-related infections in neuromodulation.

1.
Hariz M: Twenty-five years of deep brain stimulation: celebrations and apprehensions. Mov Disord 2012; 27: 930–933.
2.
Fasano A, Lozano AM: Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: 2015 and beyond. Curr Opin Neurol 2015; 28: 423–436.
3.
Hariz M, Blomstedt P, Zrinzo L: Future of brain stimulation: new targets, new indications, new technology. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 1784–1792.
4.
Bhatia S, Zhang K, Oh M, Angle C, Whiting D: Infections and hardware salvage after deep brain stimulation surgery: a single-center study and review of the literature. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2010; 88: 147–155.
5.
Blomstedt P, Hariz MI: Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a ten year experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147: 1061–1064; discussion 1064.
6.
Boviatsis EJ, Stavrinou LC, Themistocleous M, Kouyialis AT, Sakas DE: Surgical and hardware complications of deep brain stimulation: a seven-year experience and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152: 2053–2062.
7.
Sillay KA, Larson PS, Starr PA: Deep brain stimulator hardware-related infections: incidence and management in a large series. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 360–366; discussion 366–367.
8.
Romling U, Balsalobre C: Biofilm infections, their resilience to therapy and innovative treatment strategies. J Int Med 2012; 272: 541–561.
9.
Kolpen M, Mousavi N, Sams T, Bjarnsholt T, Ciofu O, Moser C, Kuhl M, Hoiby N, Jensen PO: Reinforcement of the bactericidal effect of ciprofloxacin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm by hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016; 47: 163–167.
10.
Gorgulho A, Juillard C, Uslan DZ, Tajik K, Aurasteh P, Behnke E, Pegues D, De Salles AA: Infection following deep brain stimulator implantation performed in the conventional versus magnetic resonance imaging-equipped operating room. J Neurosurg 2009; 110: 239–246.
11.
Bartek J Jr, Jakola AS, Skyrman S, Forander P, Alpkvist P, Schechtmann G, Glimaker M, Larsson A, Lind F, Mathiesen T: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in spontaneous brain abscess patients: a population-based comparative cohort study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158: 1259–1267.
12.
Larsson A, Engstrom M, Uusijarvi J, Kihlstrom L, Lind F, Mathiesen T: Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of postoperative neurosurgical infections. Neurosurgery 2008; 62(suppl 2): 652–671.
13.
Knighton DR, Halliday B, Hunt TK: Oxygen as an antibiotic: a comparison of the effects of inspired oxygen concentration and antibiotic administration on in vivo bacterial clearance. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 191–195.
14.
Park MK, Myers RA, Marzella L: Oxygen tensions and infections: modulation of microbial growth, activity of antimicrobial agents, and immunologic responses. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14: 720–740.
15.
Allen DB, Maguire JJ, Mahdavian M, Wicke C, Marcocci L, Scheuenstuhl H, Chang M, Le AX, Hopf HW, Hunt TK: Wound hypoxia and acidosis limit neutrophil bacterial killing mechanisms. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 991–996.
16.
Thom SR: Oxidative stress is fundamental to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 988–995.
17.
Brismar K, Lind F, Kratz G: Dose-dependent hyperbaric oxygen stimulation of human fibroblast proliferation. Wound Repair Regen 1997; 5: 147–150.
18.
Lind F, Eriksson B, Frostell C, Arnell P, Lycke H, Oscarsson N, Spetz L, Hammarlund C, Benoni D, Douglas J: How we work with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (in Swedish). Lakartidningen 2011; 108: 1914–1915.
19.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 97–132; quiz 133–134; discussion 196.
20.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–383.
21.
Tibbles PM, Edelsberg JS: Hyperbaric-oxygen therapy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1642–1648.
22.
Waisman D, Shupak A, Weisz G, Melamed Y: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the pediatric patient: the experience of the Israel Naval Medical Institute. Pediatrics 1998; 102:E53.
23.
Pepper J, Zrinzo L, Mirza B, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Hariz M: The risk of hardware infection in deep brain stimulation surgery is greater at impulse generator replacement than at the primary procedure. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2013; 91: 56–65.
24.
Fenoy AJ, Simpson RK Jr: Management of device-related wound complications in deep brain stimulation surgery. J Neurosurg 2012; 116: 1324–1332.
25.
Piacentino M, Pilleri M, Bartolomei L: Hardware-related infections after deep brain stimulation surgery: review of incidence, severity and management in 212 single-center procedures in the first year after implantation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153: 2337–2341.
26.
Bjerknes S, Skogseid IM, Saehle T, Dietrichs E, Toft M: Surgical site infections after deep brain stimulation surgery: frequency, characteristics and management in a 10-year period. PLoS One 2014; 9:e105288.
27.
Mekhail NA, Mathews M, Nageeb F, Guirguis M, Mekhail MN, Cheng J: Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: indications and complications. Pain Pract 2011; 11: 148–153.
28.
Motta F, Antonello CE: Analysis of complications in 430 consecutive pediatric patients treated with intrathecal baclofen therapy: 14-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 13: 301–306.
29.
Hester SM, Fisher JF, Lee MR, Macomson S, Vender JR: Evaluation of salvage techniques for infected baclofen pumps in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 10: 548–554.
30.
Dickey MP, Rice M, Kinnett DG, Lambert R, Donauer S, Gerber MA, Staat MA: Infectious complications of intrathecal baclofen pump devices in a pediatric population. Pediatr Infect Dis 2013; 32: 715–722.
31.
Revesz D, Rydenhag B, Ben-Menachem E: Complications and safety of vagus nerve stimulation: 25 years of experience at a single center. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 18: 97–104.
32.
Slack WK, Thomas DA, Perrins D: Hyperbar ic oxygenation chronic osteomyelitis. Lancet 1965; 1: 1093–1094.
33.
Mader JT, Adams KR, Wallace WR, Calhoun JH: Hyperbaric oxygen as adjunctive therapy for osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1990; 4: 433–440.
34.
Larsson A, Uusijarvi J, Lind F, Gustavsson B, Saraste H: Hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of postoperative infections in paediatric patients with neuromuscular spine deformity. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 2217–2222.
35.
Fily F, Haegelen C, Tattevin P, Buffet-Bataillon S, Revest M, Cady A, Michelet C: Deep brain stimulation hardware-related infections: a report of 12 cases and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 1020–1023.
36.
Pepper J, Meliak L, Akram H, Hyam J, Milabo C, Candelario J, Foltynie T, Limousin P, Curtis C, Hariz M, Zrinzo L: Changing of the guard: reducing infection when replacing neural pacemakers. J Neurosurg 2017; 126: 1165–1172.
37.
Boviatsis EJ, Kouyialis AT, Boutsikakis I, Korfias S, Sakas DE: Infected CNS infusion pumps: is there a chance for treatment without removal? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146: 463–467.
38.
Dlouhy BJ, Reddy A, Dahdaleh NS, Greenlee JD: Antibiotic impregnated catheter coverage of deep brain stimulation leads facilitates lead preservation after hardware infection. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19: 1369–1375.
39.
Simmen HP, Blaser J: Analysis of pH and pO2 in abscesses, peritoneal fluid, and drainage fluid in the presence or absence of bacterial infection during and after abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 1993; 166: 24–27.
40.
Mader JT, Brown GL, Guckian JC, Wells CH, Reinarz JA: A mechanism for the amelioration by hyperbaric oxygen of experimental staphylococcal osteomyelitis in rabbits. J Infect Dis 1980; 142: 915–922.
41.
Silver IA: Tissue PO2 changes in acute inflammation. Adv Exp Med Biol 1977; 94: 769–774.
42.
Rylander M, Brorson JE, Holm SE, Norrby R: Studies on some variables influencing aminoglycoside efficacy in vivo and in vitro. Scand J Infect Dis 1981; 13: 217–225.
43.
Geng F, Ma Y, Xing T, Zhuang X, Zhu J, Yao L: Effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on inflammasome signaling after traumatic brain injury. Neuroimmunomodulation 2016; 23: 122–129.
44.
Aricigil M, Dundar MA, Yucel A, Arbag H, Arslan A, Aktan M, Findik S, Kilinc I: Anti-inflammatory effects of hyperbaric oxygen on irradiated laryngeal tissues. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2017;S1808–8694(17)30033-2.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.