Background: This study evaluates prognostic factors influencing survival outcomes for 60 patients with permanent iodine-125 implants in the primary treatment of non-glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) high-grade gliomas. Methods: Stereotactic treatment planning aimed to encompass the contrast-enhancing rim of the tumor visualized by CT, with an initial dose rate of 0.05 Gy/h with 125I, delivering 100 Gy at 1 year and 103.68 Gy at infinity. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method for univariate analysis and the Cox regressional method for multivariate analysis. In addition to the implant, 34 patients received external radiation therapy (5,000–6,000 cGy) before the implant; 13 patients were implanted without additional external beam radiation, and 13 patients underwent external radiation therapy before implant placement. Results: With a mean follow-up of 77.6 months (range 3.5–164 months), 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival were 86.7% (±0.05%), 60% (±0.07%), 50% (±0.07%) and 45.7% (±0.7%), respectively. The median survival time was 57 months. Second surgery was performed following the implant in 19 patients. Findings were tumor recurrence in 11 patients (22.5%), radiation necrosis in 7 patients (14.3%) and brain abscess in 1 patient (2%). Age, sex, tumor location, side of brain, tumor volume, Karnofsky score and neurological status were correlated with survival outcome. Favorable prognostic factors were age younger than 45 years, superficial tumor location and preoperative Karnofsky score greater than 70. RPA classification was used to define this group of patients. In RPA classes I and II (n = 43), 1-year survival was 93%, while 3-, 5- and 10-year survival was 67.4, 60.5 and 55.5%, respectively, and median survival time was 91 months. In RPA class III (n = 7), 1-year survival was 71.4%, while 3- and 5-year survival was 42.9 and 28.6%, respectively, and median survival time was 47 months. In RPA class IV (n = 10), 1-year survival was 60%, while 3-, 5- and 10-year survival was 50, 22.2 and 11.1%, respectively, and median survival time was 37 months. Conclusion: Brachytherapy with permanent implant of 125I appears promising in the treatment of primary non-GBM malignant gliomas. It improved survival time and reduced the incidence of complications and provided good quality of life. In order to further confirm these results, multicenter randomized prospective studies are needed. RPA analysis is a valid tool to define prognostically distinct survival groups. In this study, 2-year survival and median survival time were improved in all prognostic classes. This would suggest that selection bias alone does not account for the survival benefit seen with 125I implants. Further randomized studies with effective stratification are needed.

Keywords:
Permanent iodine-125, Non-glioblastoma multiforme, High-grade gliomas
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.