Purpose. To evaluate the imaging and pathological correlates of successful or risk-related stereotactic radiosurgery (SR). Methods and Materials. The ten-year Gamma Knife experience in 2,344 patients at the University of Pittsburgh was reviewed. In addition, the results or radiosurgery primate, rat, and mouse models were analyzed. Successful results and untoward complications were evaluated. Results. Dose, volume, location and histology affected the imaging changes seen after SR. Imaging changes range from central loss of contrast (‘black holes’), shrinkage with diffuse contrast uptake (‘white dwarfs’), or stabilization or growth arrest. Limited pathological data indicates that the prevention of cell division coupled with vascular obliteration results in tumor control, whereas a progressive endothelial proliferative and obliterative response results in arteriovenous malformation (AVM) obliteration. Perilesional imaging changes, especially in vascular malformations, may reflect flow phenomena, interstitial edema, or profound reactive astrocytosis (‘supernovas’). Conclusion. Imaging changes correlate with both success and risks of stereotactic radiosurgery; however, pathological correlates are limited. High resolution neurodiagnostic imaging provides the best quality control available to assess the response to stereotactic radiosurgery. In the future, additional molecular probes are necessary to assess the radiobiological effects of radiosurgery.

Keywords:
Radiobiology, Imaging response, Radiosurgery, Gamma Knife, MR imaging
This content is only available via PDF.
1998
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.