We have read with interest the article by Ng et al. [[1], in this issue of Respiration], which revealed that the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) can predict outcomes following pulmonary embolism (PE). The authors expressed concern about the single-center nature of the study and the fact that the outcome data were obtained from a death registry. We wondered whether the results of the authors could be extrapolated to other patient groups. We have previously communicated the results of a prospective, single-center study that assessed the incidence of right ventricle dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension in 103 consecutive patients with a life expectancy of >6 months, who were diagnosed with hemodynamically stable PE by means of computed tomography pulmonary angiography [2]. The study was underpowered to assess short-term outcomes because of a low rate of in-hospital adverse events. However, we followed the long-term evolution of the patients after hospital discharge, and we found that neither residual vascular obstruction on the 6-month computed tomography pulmonary angiography [3] nor persistent echocardiographic signs or right ventricular pressure overload 6 months after the PE [4] predicted long-term adverse outcome events.

We retrospectively reviewed the patients included in the original study and calculated for each patient the non-age-adjusted CCI scores (na-CCI) at the time of diagnosis of PE, using the same methodology as Ng et al. [1]. We also calculated the age-adjusted CCI score (a-CCI) by adding one point to the score for each decade of live over the age of 50 [5]. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival plots were obtained. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the c-statistic of the adjusted and unadjusted CCI scores. Differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated using the method of DeLong et al. [6]. The present, retrospective study was approved by the review board of our institution.

Patients' characteristics and exclusion criteria have been reported elsewhere [2]. In summary, hemodynamically unstable PE, life expectancy <6 months, and creatinine clearance <35 ml/min were exclusion criteria. Mean age was 69 ± 15 years (median: 74 years, range: 29-92 years). Fifty-five percent of patients were male. Complete information on long-term evolution (median follow-up: 2.97 years) was obtained for 96 patients. Twelve patients died (median survival time from diagnosis: 771 days, range: 348-1,240 days). The median na-CCI score for the cohort was 0 (IQR: 0-1). Sixty-one patients had an na-CCI score of 0. Mortality for patients with an na-CCI score of 0 was 4.9 versus 25.7% for patients with na-CCI score ≥1 (p = 0.0085). The hazard ratio for patients with an na-CCI score ≥1 versus 0 was 5.22 (95% CI: 1.63-17.11; p = 0.0055). The median a-CCI score was 4 (IQR: 3-5). The c-statistic for na-CCI was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.83). The c-statistic for a-CCI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.85). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were not significantly different (difference: 0.025; 95% CI: -0.094 to 0.145; p = 0.68).

Although the present analysis is limited by its small size and retrospective nature, we think that it agrees with the findings of Ng et al. These results support the hypothesis that the CCI predicts long-term survival after PE, in a cohort with different characteristics from the one studied by Ng et al. Our patients did not suffer from the most severe form of PE, and both end-stage comorbidities and significant renal disease were excluded. Nonetheless, the CCI was still a predictor of mortality in this population. This finding supports the validity of the study by Ng et al., and we agree with the authors that future prospective studies should be performed before the index can be systematically incorporated into risk models to predict evolution after PE.

1.
Ng ACC, Chow V, Yong ASC, Chung T, Kritharides L: Prognostic impact of the Charlson comorbidity index on mortality following acute pulmonary embolism. Respiration 2013;85:408-416.
2.
Golpe R, Pérez-de-Llano LA, Castro-Añón O, et al: Right ventricle dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension in hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism. Respir Med 2010;104:1370-1376.
3.
Golpe R, Pérez-de-Llano LA, Castro-Añón O, et al: Long-term outcome of patients with persistent vascular obstruction on computed tomography pulmonary angiography 6 months after acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol 2012;53:728-731.
4.
Golpe R, Testa-Fernández A, Pérez-de-Llano LA, et al: Long term clinical outcome of patients with persistent right ventricle dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:756-761.
5.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383.
6.
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.