Background: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using valves and coils has been approved for use since 2003 and 2010, respectively. Objective(s): To study adoption patterns of BLVR in an early-adopting country, and to estimate potential treatment volumes in other European countries. Methods: Therapy- and age-specific volumes for endobronchial valve and coil procedures were obtained from German federal statistics for 2007–2016. Therapy-specific and total BLVR procedure volumes and growth were computed, and patterns in treatment age and device utilization analyzed. Patient volumes for other European countries were predicted using mean German patient volumes of the last 3 data years and age-specific population and emphysema incidences. Results: Over the study period, annual BLVR procedure volumes grew from 91 to 2,053 (+2,256%), reaching a peak of 2,556 procedures in 2013. Coil procedures constituted 36% of the total volume in 2016. Treatment age was stable over time, with highest procedure counts in age group 60–64 years for valves and 65–69 years for coils. A limited increase in device use per procedure was observed. For -Germany, 1,655 newly treated BLVR patients were estimated per year, approximating about 5% of the annual newly diagnosed severe emphysema cases. Predicted volume estimates for other European countries ranged from 1 for Liechtenstein to 1,226 for France. Conclusions: Analysis of -German procedure data show pronounced BLVR therapy uptake in the early years of adoption, with the more recently introduced coil therapy used in about one-third of patients. Estimated patient volumes to date constitute only a small fraction of the severe emphysema population.

Keywords:
Pulmonary disease, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Emphysema, Lung volume reduction, Bronchoscopy, Germany, Europe
1.
Kaplan RM, Ries AL: Health-related quality of life in emphysema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008; 5: 561–566.
2.
Rycroft CE, Heyes A, Lanza L, Becker K: Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a literature review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2012; 7: 457–494.
3.
Martinez FJ, Foster G, Curtis JL, Criner G, Weinmann G, Fishman A, DeCamp MM, Benditt J, Sciurba F, Make B, Mohsenifar Z, Diaz P, Hoffman E, Wise R: Predictors of mortality in patients with emphysema and severe airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 1326–1334.
4.
Shah PL, Herth FJ, van Geffen WH, Deslee G, Slebos DJ: Lung volume reduction for emphysema. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5: 147–156.
5.
Slebos DJ, Shah PL, Herth FJ, Valipour A: Endobronchial valves for endoscopic lung volume reduction: best practice recommendations from expert panel on endoscopic lung volume reduction. Respiration 2017; 93: 138–150.
6.
Sciurba FC, Ernst A, Herth FJ, Strange C, Criner GJ, Marquette CH, Kovitz KL, Chiacchierini RP, Goldin J, McLennan G; VENT Study Research Group: A randomized study of endobronchial valves for advanced emphysema. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1233–1244.
7.
Herth FJ, Noppen M, Valipour A, Leroy S, Vergnon JM, Ficker JH, Egan JJ, Gasparini S, Agusti C, Holmes-Higgin D, Ernst A; International VENT Study Group: Efficacy predictors of lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in a European cohort. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 1334–1342.
8.
Sciurba FC, Criner GJ, Strange C, Shah PL, Michaud G, Connolly TA, Deslee G, Tillis WP, Delage A, Marquette CH, Krishna G, Kalhan R, Ferguson JS, Jantz M, Maldonado F, McKenna R, Majid A, Rai N, Gay S, Dransfield MT, Angel L, Maxfield R, Herth FJ, Wahidi MM, Mehta A, Slebos DJ; RENEW Study Research Group: Effect of endobronchial coils vs usual care on exercise tolerance in patients with severe emphysema: the RENEW Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016; 315: 2178–2189.
9.
Deslee G, Mal H, Dutau H, Bourdin A, Vergnon JM, Pison C, Kessler R, Jounieaux V, Thiberville L, Leroy S, Marceau A, Laroumagne S, Mallet JP, Dukic S, Barbe C, Bulsei J, Jolly D, Durand-Zaleski I, Marquette CH; REVOLENS Study Group: Lung volume reduction coil treatment vs usual care in patients with severe emphysema: the REVOLENS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016; 315: 175–184.
10.
Wang Y, Lai TW, Xu F, Zhou JS, Li ZY, Xu XC, Chen HP, Ying SM, Li W, Shen HH, Chen ZH: Efficacy and safety of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapy in patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 78031–78043.
11.
Klooster K, ten Hacken NH, Hartman JE, Kerstjens HA, van Rikxoort EM, Slebos DJ: Endobronchial valves for emphysema without interlobar collateral ventilation. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2325–2335.
12.
Valipour A, Slebos DJ, Herth F, Darwiche K, Wagner M, Ficker JH, Petermann C, Hubner RH, Stanzel F, Eberhardt R, Team IS: Endobronchial valve therapy in patients with homogeneous emphysema. Results from the IMPACT Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 1073–1082.
13.
Hartman JE, Klooster K, Ten Hacken NHT, Slebos DJ: The safety and feasibility of re-treating patients with severe emphysema with endobronchial coils: a Pilot Study. COPD 2017; 14: 339–343.
14.
Blanco I, Diego I, Bueno P, Fernandez E, Casas-Maldonado F, Esquinas C, Soriano JB, Miravitlles M: Geographical distribution of COPD prevalence in Europe, estimated by an inverse distance weighting interpolation technique. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018; 13: 57–67.
15.
Geldmacher H, Biller H, Herbst A, Urbanski K, Allison M, Buist AS, Hohlfeld JM, Welte T: (The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] in Germany. Results of the BOLD study). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2008; 133: 2609–2614.
16.
Methvin JN, Mannino DM, Casey BR: COPD prevalence in southeastern Kentucky: the burden of lung disease study. Chest 2009; 135: 102–107.
17.
Pietzsch JB, Garner A, Herth FJ: Cost-effectiveness of endobronchial valve therapy for severe emphysema: a model-based projection based on the VENT study. Respiration 2014; 88: 389–398.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.