Background: Endoscopic estimation of the degree of stenosis in central airway obstruction is subjective and highly variable. Objective: To determine the benefits of using SENSA (System for Endoscopic Stenosis Assessment), an image-based computational software, for obtaining objective stenosis index (SI) measurements among a group of expert bronchoscopists and general pulmonologists. Methods: A total of 7 expert bronchoscopists and 7 general pulmonologists were enrolled to validate SENSA usage. The SI obtained by the physicians and by SENSA were compared with a reference SI to set their precision in SI computation. We used SENSA to efficiently obtain this reference SI in 11 selected cases of benign stenosis. A Web platform with three user-friendly microtasks was designed to gather the data. The users had to visually estimate the SI from videos with and without contours of the normal and the obstructed area provided by SENSA. The users were able to modify the SENSA contours to define the reference SI using morphometric bronchoscopy. Results: Visual SI estimation accuracy was associated with neither bronchoscopic experience (p = 0.71) nor the contours of the normal and the obstructed area provided by the system (p = 0.13). The precision of the SI by SENSA was 97.7% (95% CI: 92.4-103.7), which is significantly better than the precision of the SI by visual estimation (p < 0.001), with an improvement by at least 15%. Conclusion: SENSA provides objective SI measurements with a precision of up to 99.5%, which can be calculated from any bronchoscope using an affordable scalable interface. Providing normal and obstructed contours on bronchoscopic videos does not improve physicians' visual estimation of the SI.

Keywords:
Bronchoscopy, Tracheal stenosis, Airway stenosis, Computer-assisted analysis
1.
Freitag L, Ernst A, Unger M, Kovitz K, Marquette CH: A proposed classification system of central airway stenosis. Eur Respir J 2007;30:7-12.
2.
Miller RD, Hyatt RE: Evaluation of obstructing lesions of the trachea and larynx by flow-volume loops. Am Rev Respir Dis 1973;108:475-481.
3.
Polverosi R, Vigo M, Baron S, Rossi G: Evaluation of tracheobronchial lesions with spiral CT: comparison between virtual endoscopy and bronchoscopy (in Italian). Radiol Med 2001;102:313-319.
4.
Forkert L, Watanabe H, Sutherland K, Vincent S, Fisher JT: Quantitative videobronchoscopy: a new technique to assess airway caliber. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154(pt 1):1794-1803.
5.
Hayashi A, Takanashi S, Tsushima T, Denpoya J, Okumura K, Hirota K: New method for quantitative assessment of airway calibre using a stereovision fibreoptic bronchoscope. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:512-516.
6.
Begnaud A, Connett JE, Harwood EM, Jantz MA, Mehta HJ: Measuring central airway obstruction: what do bronchoscopists do? Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:85-90.
7.
Murgu S, Colt H: Subjective assessment using still bronchoscopic images misclassifies airway narrowing in laryngotracheal stenosis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:655-660.
8.
Murgu S, Colt HG: Morphometric bronchoscopy in adults with central airway obstruction: case illustrations and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1318-1324.
9.
Sánchez C, Bernal J, Sánchez FJ, Diez M, Rosell A, Gil D: Toward online quantification of tracheal stenosis from videobronchoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2015;10:935-945.
10.
Brouns M, Jayaraju ST, Lacor C, De Mey J, Noppen M, Vincken W, Verbanck S: Tracheal stenosis: a flow dynamics study. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007;102:1178-1184.
11.
Maier-Hein L, Kondermann D, Ross T, Mersmann S, Heim E, Bodenstedt S, Kenngott HG, Sanchez A, Wagner M, Preukschas A, Wekerle AL, Helfert S, März K, Mehrabi A, Speidel S, Stock C: Crowdtruth validation: a new paradigm for validating algorithms that rely on image correspondences. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2015;10:1201-1212.
12.
Wieand S, Gail MH, James BR, James KL: A family of nonparametric statistics for comparing diagnostic markers with paired or unpaired data. Biometrika 1989;76:585-592.
13.
Demo of SENSA validation website. http://ivendis.cvc.uab.es/Dades/SENSAValidationDEMO/.
14.
R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013.
15.
Gibson EJ, Bergman R: The effect of training on absolute estimation of distance over the ground. J Exp Psychol 1954;48:473-482.
16.
Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Mehta AC: Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:1278-1297.
17.
Harris K, Debiane LG, Ong P, Eapen GA: Quantifying central airway obstruction during therapeutic bronchoscopy. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:799-802.
18.
Masters IB, Eastburn MM, Francis PW, Wootton R, Zimmerman PV, Ware RS, Chang AB: Quantification of the magnification and distortion effects of a pediatric flexible video-bronchoscope. Respir Res 2005;6:16.
19.
Myer CM 3rd, O'Connor DM, Cotton RT: Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103(pt 1):319-323.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.