Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is diagnosed either by ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy or pulmonary CT angiography. One of the imaging methods used in nuclear medicine is hybrid SPECT/CT scintigraphy. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of SPECT/CT(Q) scintigraphy in the diagnosis of PE and to compare SPECT/CT(Q) with planar(Q) and SPECT(Q) methods. Methods: The study group consisted of 109 consecutive patients suspected of having PE referred for performing lung scintigraphy. The inclusion criteria were: performance of perfusion planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT scans; availability of clinical data covering a 6-month follow-up period, and D-dimer level testing. The number of eligible patients was 84. PE was reported in patients with at least 1 segmental or 2 subsegmental perfusion defects without parenchymal abnormalities on CT scans. PE was excluded when there was a normal perfusion pattern or perfusion defects were caused by lung parenchymal abnormalities or were not arranged in accordance with the pulmonary vasculature. Results: Twenty-six patients (31%) had a final diagnosis of PE. The sensitivity and specificity values of each method were as follows: planar(Q) 73 and 43%, SPECT(Q) 88 and 47% and SPECT/CT(Q) 100 and 83%. SPECT/CT(Q) yielded a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than planar(Q) (p < 0.001) and SPECT(Q) (p < 0.001) scans. Conclusions: We conclude that hybrid SPECT/CT(Q) imaging has a high diagnostic efficacy in the diagnosis of PE. Lung perfusion scintigraphy performed with a hybrid SPECT/CT device has a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than scanning performed with the planar or SPECT technique.

Keywords:
Single-photon emission computed tomography/ computed tomography, Pulmonary embolism, Lung perfusion scintigraphy
1.
Nordström M, Lindblad B: Autopsy-verified venous thromboembolism within a defined urban population - the city of Malmö, Sweden. APMIS 1998;106:378-384.
2.
Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, et al: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe: the number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost 2007;98:756-764.
3.
EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1356-1370, 1528-1538.
4.
Viau P, Franken P, Padovani P, et al: Imagerie hybride dans l'embolie pulmonaire aiguë: apport de la TDM couplée à la tomoscintigraphie de ventilation et de perfusion. Med Nucl 2011;35:117-125.
5.
Gradinscak D, Roach PJ, Schembri G, et al: Lung SPECT perfusion scintigraphy: can CT substitute for ventilation imaging?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36(suppl):S300.
6.
Sawyer LJ, Starritt HC, Hiscock SC, Evans MJ: Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:144-149.
7.
ICRP: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum to ICRP Publication 53). ICRP Publication 80. Ann ICRP 1998;28.
8.
Bajc M, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B: Ventilation/perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. J Intern Med 2008;264:379-387.
9.
Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, Johnbeck CB, et al: Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1987-1992.
10.
Ling IT, Naqvi HA, Siew TK, Loh NK, Ryan GF: SPECT ventilation perfusion scanning with the addition of low-dose CT for the investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Intern Med J 2012;42:1257-1261.
11.
Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al: Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:165-171.
12.
Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, et al: Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1501-1508.
13.
Collart JP, Roelants V, Vanpee D, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, et al: Is a lung perfusion scan obtained by using single photon emission computed tomography able to improve the radionuclide diagnosis of pulmonary embolism? Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:1107-1113.
14.
Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, Recke P, et al: Comparison of V/Q SPECT and planar V/Q lung scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun 2010;31:82-86.
15.
Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P, Soans B, et al: A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 2009;136:1546-1553.
16.
Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2008;29:2276-2315.
17.
Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA 1990;263:2753-2759.
18.
Palmowski K, Oltmanns U, Kreuter M, et al: Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: conventional ventilation/perfusion SPECT is superior to the combination of perfusion SPECT and nonenhanced CT. Respiration 2014;88:291-297.
19.
Lu Y, Lorenzoni A, Fox JJ, et al: Noncontrast perfusion single-photon emission CT/CT scanning: a new test for the expedited, high-accuracy diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 2014;145:1079-1088.
20.
Herald P, Roach P, Schembri GP: Does the addition of low dose CT improve diagnostic accuracy of V/Q SPECT scintigraphy?. J Nucl Med 2008;49(suppl):91P.
21.
Niemann T, Bongartz G: Detectability of subsegmental pulmonary vessels in 64 MDCT-pulmonary angiography. Internet J Radiol 2010;11:3.
22.
Righini M, Goehring C, Bounamaux H, Perrier A: Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2000;109:357-361.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.