The initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is not standardized throughout the world. Although aspiration is less painful and requires less hospitalization than chest tube drainage does, the latter is still frequently used as the initial treatment. After a recurrence or failure of aspiration, chest tube drainage, again, is often the procedure of choice although VATS or thoracoscopy and talc poudrage have been proven to be much more effective. For the surgical treatment of recurrent pneumothorax, the role of routine resection of blebs and nonruptured bullae still needs to be assessed. Pleurodesis (chemical or mechanical) should be the standard treatment in a surgical procedure.

Keywords:
Thoracoscopy, Pneumothorax, Pleural disease
1.
Baumann M, Strange C, Heffner J, et al: Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest 2001;119:590–602.
2.
Macduff A, Arnold T, Harvey J: Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010;65(suppl 2):ii18–ii31.
3.
Kelly AM, Druda D: Comparison of size classification of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by three international guidelines: a case for international consensus? Respir Med 2008;102:1830–1832.
4.
Gaudio M, Hafner J: Simple aspiration compared to chest tube insertion in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:548–560.
5.
Kelly AM, Clooney M: Deviation from published guidelines in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Australia. Intern Med J 2008;38:64–67.
6.
Noppen M, Alexander P, Driesen P, et al: Manual aspiration versus chest tube drainage in first episodes of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a multicenter, prospective, randomized pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1240–1244.
7.
Marquette CH, Marx A, Leroy S. Simplified stepwise management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a pilot study. Eur Respir J 2006;27:470–476.
8.
Chen JS, Hsao-Hun H, Kung-Tsao T, et al: Salvage for unsuccessful aspiration of primary pneumothorax: thoracoscopic surgery or chest tube drainage? Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1908–1913.
9.
Tschopp JM, Boutin C, Astoul P: Talcage by medical thoracoscopy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax is more cost-effective than drainage: a randomized study. Eur Respir J 2002;20:1003–1009.
10.
Cardillo G, Facciolo F, Giunti R, Gasparri R, Lopergolo M, Orsetti R, Martelli M: Videothoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a 6-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:357–361.
11.
Cardillo G, Carleo F, Giunti R, Carbone L, Mariotta S, Salvadori L, Petrella L, Martelli M: Videothoracoscopic talc poudrage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a single-institution experience in 861 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:322–328.
12.
Treasure T: Minimal access surgery for pneumothorax. Lancet 2007;370:294–295.
13.
Barker A, Maratos EC, Edmonds L, et al: Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials. Lancet 2007;370:329–335.
14.
Noppen M: Who’s (still) afraid of talc? Eur Respir J 2007;29:619–621.
15.
Cardillo G, Carleo F, Carbone L, Di Martino M, Salvadori L, Ricci A, Petrella L, Martelli M: Long-term lung function following videothoracoscopic talc poudrage for primary spontaneous recurrent pneumothorax. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:802–805.
16.
Chou SH, Li HP, Lee JY, Chang SJ, Lee YL, Chang YT, Kao EL, Dai ZK, Huang MF: Is prophylactic treatment of contralateral blebs in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax indicated? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:1241–1245.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.