Background: Cough is a common symptom for which patients often seek medical advice and consume vast amounts of drugs. It is a real challenge for both the physician and the clinical researcher to evaluate a cough’s clinical importance and its precise response to treatment. Objectives: This systematic literature review has the following objectives: first, to make an inventory of the validated tools for assessing cough, and second, to investigate the extent to which the results of various assessment methods can be correlated. Methods: Two independent investigators searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for validation studies on cough assessment tools. Results: Thirty-four studies were included. Several ambulatory cough monitors automatically identify cough and have been validated in a limited number of patients. Three cough-specific quality-of-life scales (Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Cough Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Burden of Cough Questionnaire) have been validated. No validation studies of descriptive scores or visual analogue scales were found. The correlations between quality-of-life scores and cough frequency were good. The correlations between descriptive scores or visual analogue scales and more objective methods, such as cough frequency monitoring or quality-of-life scores, were inconsistent. Conclusion: Cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaires can provide valid outcomes for research into cough. Although the current developments in cough monitoring devices are promising, further studies on a larger scale, under more realistic conditions, and for different patterns of cough are required before they can be recommended for widespread use.

Keywords:
Cough, assessment, monitoring, measurement, Quality of life, Systematic review, Visual analogue scales
1.
Okkes IM, Oskam SK, Lamberts H: The probability of specific diagnoses for patients presenting with common symptoms to Dutch family physicians. J Fam Pract 2002;51:31–36.
2.
Irwin RS, Curley FJ, French CL: Chronic cough: the spectrum and frequency of causes, key components of the diagnostic evaluation, and outcome of specific therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:640–647.
3.
Fuller P, Picciotto A, Davies M, McKenzie SA: Cough and sleep in inner-city children. Eur Respir J 1998;12:426–431.
4.
Eccles R, Morris S, Jawad M: Lack of effect of codeine in the treatment of cough associated with acute upper respiratory tract infection. J Clin Pharm Ther 1992;17:175–180.
5.
Eccles R: The powerful placebo in cough studies? Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2002;15:303–308.
6.
Schroeder K, Fahey T: Should we advise parents to administer over the counter cough medicines for acute cough? Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Arch Dis Child 2002;86:170–175.
7.
Paul IM, Yoder KE, Crowell KR, Shaffer ML, McMillan HS, Carlson LC, et al: Effect of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and placebo on nocturnal cough and sleep quality for coughing children and their parents. Pediatrics 2004;114:e85–e90.
8.
Leconte S, Paulus D, Degryse J: Prolonged cough in children: a summary of the Belgian primary care clinical guideline. Prim Care Respir J 2008;17:206–211.
9.
Elasy TA, Gaddy G: Measuring subjective outcomes: rethinking reliability and validity. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:757–761.
10.
Smith J, Owen E, Earis J, Woodcock A: Effect of codeine on objective measurement of cough in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:831–835.
11.
Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J: Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:9.
12.
Matos S, Birring SS, Pavord ID, Evans DH: Detection of cough signals in continuous audio recordings using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006;53:1078–1083.
13.
Birring SS, Fleming T, Matos S, Raj AA, Evans DH, Pavord ID: The Leicester Cough Monitor: preliminary validation of an automated cough detection system in chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2008;31:1013–1018.
14.
Smith JA, Earis JE, Woodcock AA: Establishing a gold standard for manual cough counting: video versus digital audio recordings. Cough 2006;2:6.
15.
Barry SJ, Dane AD, Morice AH, Walmsley AD: The automatic recognition and counting of cough. Cough 2006;2:8.
16.
Paul IM, Wai K, Jewell SJ, Shaffer ML, Varadan VV: Evaluation of a new self-contained, ambulatory, objective cough monitor. Cough 2006;2:7.
17.
Chang AB, Newman RG, Phelan PD, Robertson CF: A new use for an old Holter monitor: an ambulatory cough meter. Eur Respir J 1997;10:1637–1639.
18.
Munyard P, Busst C, Logan-Sinclair R, Bush A: A new device for ambulatory cough recording. Pediatr Pulmonol 1994;18:178–186.
19.
Hamutcu R, Francis J, Karakoc F, Bush A: Objective monitoring of cough in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2002;34:331–335.
20.
Corrigan DL, Paton JY: Pilot study of objective cough monitoring in infants. Pediatr Pulmonol 2003;35:350–357.
21.
Coyle MA, Keenan DB, Henderson LS, Watkins ML, Haumann BK, Mayleben DW, et al: Evaluation of an ambulatory system for the quantification of cough frequency in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cough 2005;1:3.
22.
Huisman AN, Wu MZ, Uil SM, van den Berg JW: Reliability and validity of a Dutch version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Cough 2007;3:3.
23.
Baiardini I, Braido F, Fassio O, Tarantini F, Pasquali M, Tarchino F, et al: A new tool to assess and monitor the burden of chronic cough on quality of life: Chronic Cough Impact Questionnaire. Allergy 2005;60:482–488.
24.
Braido F, Baiardini I, Tarantini F, Fassio O, Balestracci S, Pasquali M, et al: Chronic cough and QoL in allergic and respiratory diseases measured by a new specific validated tool-CCIQ. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006;16:110–116.
25.
Birring SS, Prudon B, Carr AJ, Singh SJ, Morgan MD, Pavord ID: Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Thorax 2003;58:339–343.
26.
French CT, Irwin RS, Fletcher KE, Adams TM: Evaluation of a cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Chest 2002;121:1123–1131.
27.
Newcombe PA, Sheffield JK, Juniper EF, Marchant JM, Halsted RA, Masters IB, et al: Development of a parent-proxy quality-of-life chronic cough-specific questionnaire: clinical impact vs. psychometric evaluations. Chest 2008;133:386–395.
28.
Kalpaklioglu AF, Kara T, Kurtipek E, Kocyigit P, Ekici A, Ekici M: Evaluation and impact of chronic cough: comparison of specific vs. generic quality-of-life questionnaires. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005;94:581–585.
29.
Polley L, Yaman N, Heaney L, Cardwell C, Murtagh E, Ramsey J, et al: Impact of cough across different chronic respiratory diseases: comparison of two cough-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires. Chest 2008;134:295–302.
30.
Smith J, Owen E, Earis J, Woodcock A: Cough in COPD: correlation of objective monitoring with cough challenge and subjective assessments. Chest 2006;130:379–385.
31.
Decalmer SC, Webster D, Kelsall AA, McGuinness K, Woodcock AA, Smith JA: Chronic cough: how do cough reflex sensitivity and subjective assessments correlate with objective cough counts during ambulatory monitoring? Thorax 2007;62:329–334.
32.
Smith JA, Owen EC, Jones AM, Dodd ME, Webb AK, Woodcock A: Objective measurement of cough during pulmonary exacerbations in adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2006;61:425–429.
33.
Kelsall A, Decalmer S, Webster D, Brown N, McGuinness K, Woodcock A, et al: How to quantify coughing: correlations with quality of life in chronic cough. Eur Respir J 2008;32:175–179.
34.
Krahnke J, Gentile D, Angelini B, Danzig M, Skoner D: Comparison of objective and subjective measurements of cough frequency in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004;93:259–264.
35.
Li AM, Tsang TW, Chan DF, Lam HS, So HK, Sung RY, et al: Cough frequency in children with mild asthma correlates with sputum neutrophil count. Thorax 2006;61:747–750.
36.
Chang AB, Newman RD, Carlin JB, Phelan PD, Robertson CF: Subjective scoring of cough in children: parent-completed vs. child-completed diary cards vs. an objective method. Eur Respir J 1998;11:462–46
37.
Chang AB, Phelan PD, Robertson CF, Roberts RG, Sawyer SM: Relation between measurements of cough severity. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:57–60.
38.
Zihlif N, Paraskakis E, Lex C, Van de Pohl LA, Bush A:Correlation between cough frequency and airway inflammation in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005;39:551–55
39.
Hoskyns EW, Thomson A, Decker E, Hutchins A, Simpson H: Effect of controlled release salbutamol on nocturnal cough in asthma. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:1209–1212.
40.
Marchant JM, Newcombe PA, Juniper EF, Sheffield JK, Stathis SL, Chang AB: What is the burden of chronic cough for families? Chest 2008;134:303–309.
41.
Torrego A, Haque RA, Nguyen LT, Hew M, Carr DH, Wilson R, et al: Capsaicin cough sensitivity in bronchiectasis. Thorax 2006;61:706–709.
42.
Jeyakumar A, Brickman TM, Haben M: Effectiveness of amitriptyline versus cough suppressants in the treatment of chronic cough resulting from postviral vagal neuropathy. Laryngoscope 2006;116:2108–2112.
43.
Birring SS, Matos S, Patel RB, Prudon B, Evans DH, Pavord ID: Cough frequency, cough sensitivity and health status in patients with chronic cough. Respir Med 2006;100:1105–1109.
44.
Marsden PA, Smith JA, Kelsall AA, Owen E, Naylor JR, Webster D, et al: A comparison of objective and subjective measures of cough in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;122:903–907.
45.
Morice AH, Fontana GA, Belvisi MG, Birring SS, Chung KF, Dicpinigaitis PV, et al: ERS guidelines on the assessment of cough. Eur Respir J 2007;29:1256–1276.
46.
Ekici M, Ekici A, Akin A, Altinkaya V, Bulcun E: Chronic airway diseases in adult life and childhood infections. Respiration 2008;75:55–59.
47.
Dong GH, Ma YN, Ding HL, Jin J, Cao Y, Zhao YD, et al: Effects of housing characteristics and home environmental factors on respiratory symptoms of 10,784 elementary school children from northeast china. Respiration 2008;76:82–91.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.