Background: Electromagnetic navigation has been approved for use as an adjunct to standard bronchoscopy. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the size of the lesion and successful navigation to the lesion. Objectives: The performance of two different biopsy tools, i.e. catheter aspiration and forceps biopsy, in the diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules (SPN) guided by electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) was examined. Methods: 54 patients referred for suspected lung cancer underwent ENB and 55 SPN (<3 cm) were sampled using both techniques. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) was used to verify the accuracy of target lesion localization by ENB. Primary end points of the study were successful navigation to the lesion and a positive diagnosis. Patients were followed until a definitive diagnosis was obtained. Results: All 55 lesions were accessed. Two lesions were excluded from data analysis as the patients were lost to follow-up and their diagnoses could not be confirmed. Of the remaining 53 lesions, 40 samples (75.5%) were diagnostic. Compared to forceps biopsy, catheter aspiration was positively correlated with the success rate (36/40 vs. 22/40; p = 0.035). The diagnostic yield was 93% when EBUS verified the lesion location after navigation and only 48% when lesion location was not confirmed. There were no significant complications. Conclusions: ENB is a useful tool in the evaluation of SPN <3 cm in diameter. For malignant lesions, sampling by catheter aspiration is associated with a higher diagnostic yield than sampling by forceps biopsy alone, in particular when EBUS could not confirm lesion location prior to sampling.

Keywords:
Bronchoscopy, Catheter aspiration, Electromagnetic navigation, Endobronchial ultrasound, Lung cancer, Pulmonary nodules, Transbronchial biopsy
1.
Tuddenham WI: Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. Am J Roentgenol 1984;43:509–517.
2.
Leef JL 3rd, Klein IS: The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:123–143.
3.
Midthun DE, Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE: Evaluation of nodules detected by screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral computed tomography. Lung Cancer 2003;41 (suppl 2):S40.
4.
Libby DM, Smith JP, Altorki NK, Pasmantier MW, Yankelevitz D, Henschke CI: Managing the small pulmonary nodule discovered by CT. Chest 2004;125:1522–1529.
5.
Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, Sharafkaneh A, Manian P: Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 2000;117:1049–1054.
6.
Shiner RJ, Rosenman J, Kaz I, Reichart N, Hershko E, Yellin A: Bronchoscopic evaluation of peripheral lung tumours. Thorax 1988;43:887–889.
7.
Chechani V: Bronchoscopic diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules and lung masses in the absence of endobronchial abnormality. Chest 1996;109:620–625.
8.
Mori K, Yanase N, Kaneko M, Ono R, Ikeda S: Diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer in cases of tumors 2 cm or less in size. Chest 1989;95:304–308.
9.
Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Herth F, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A: Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy in peripheral lung lesions. Chest 2007;131:1800– 1805.
10.
Makris D, Scherpereel A, Leroy S, Bouchindhomme B, Faivre JB, Remy J, Ramon P, Marquette CH: Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy for small peripheral lung lesions. Eur Respir J 2007;29:472–478.
11.
Gildea TR, Mazzone PJ, Karnak D, Meziane M, Mehta A: Electromagnetic navigation diagnostic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:982–989.
12.
Eberhardt R, Anantham D, Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Herth F: Multimodality bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:36–41.
13.
Schwarz Y, Greif j, Becker H, Ernst A, Mehta A: Real-time electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy to peripheral lung lesions using overlaid CT images: the first human study. Chest 2006;129:988–994.
14.
Franke KJ, Nilius G, Rühle KH: Transbronchiale Biopsie im Vergleich zur Katheteraspiration bei peripheren Lungenherden. Pneumologie 2006;60:7–10.
15.
Herth FJF, Eberhardt R, Becker HD, Ernst A: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in fluoroscopically invisible solitary pulmonary nodules: a prospective trial. Chest 2006;129:147–150.
16.
Yang MC, Liu WT, Lin HC, Lin HC, Chen HC, Chou CL, Hsueh S, Kuo HP: Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in peripheral lung cancers. J Formos Med Assoc 2004;103:116–129.
17.
Shirakawa T, Imamura F, Hamamoto J, Honda I, Fukushima K, Sugimoto M, Shirkakusa T: Usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonography for transbronchial lung biopsies of peripheral lung lesions. Respiration 2004;71:260–268.
18.
Gasparini S, Ferretti M, Secchi EB, Baldelli S, Zuccatosta L, Gusella P: Integration of transbronchial and percutaneous approach in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules or masses: experience with 1,027 consecutive cases. Chest 1995;108:131–137.
19.
Tan BB, Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD: The solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 2003;123(suppl 1):89–96.
20.
Reichenberger F, Weber J, Tamm M, Bolliger CT, Dalquen P, Perruchoud AP, Soler M: The value of transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions. Chest 1999;116:704–708.
21.
Schreiber G, McCrory DC: Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence. Chest 2003;123(1 suppl):115S–128S.
22.
DeCamp MM Jr, Jaklitsch MT, Mentzer SJ, Harpole DH Jr, Sugarbaker DJ: The safety and versatility of video-thoracoscopy: a prospective analysis of 895 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 1995;181:113–120.
23.
Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, Razavi MK, Sze DY, Dake MD: CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 2003;229:475–481.
24.
Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT, Tsay PK, Lui KW, Cheung YC, Chou AS: Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest 2004;126:748–754.
25.
Allen MS, Deschamps C, Jones DM, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC: Video-assisted thoracic surgical procedures: the Mayo experience. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;71:351–359.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.