Background: Measurements of transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO2) with current devices are proven to provide clinically acceptable agreement with measurements of partial arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) in several settings but not during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the agreement between PaCO2 and PtcCO2 measurements (using a Tosca 500 with a Tosca sensor 92) during CPET. A secondary objective was to investigate the agreement between arterial and transcutaneous oxygen saturation (SaO2, SpO2) as measured with this sensor during CPET. Methods: In patients with various pulmonary diseases, PtcCO2 and SpO2 were continuously measured and compared with arterial blood gas samples during CPET. A maximum bias of 0.5 kPa and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of 1 kPa between carbon dioxide pressure (PCO2) measurements were determined as clinically acceptable. Results: In total 101 ‘paired’ arterial and transcutaneous measurements were obtained from 21 patients. Bias between PaCO2 and PtcCO2 was –0.03 kPa with LOA from –0.78 to 0.71 kPa. Bias between SaO2 and SpO2 was –1.0% with LOA from –2.83 to 0.83%. Conclusions: Transcutaneous estimations of PCO2 and SpO2 are accurate and can be used in CPET, circumvening the need for arterial cannulation.

American Thoracic Society, American College of Chest Physicians: ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:211–277.
Williams AJ: ABC of oxygen: assessing and interpreting arterial blood gases and acid-base balance. BMJ 1998;317:1213–1216.
Fajac I, Texereau J, Rivoal V, Dessanges JF, Dinh-Xuan AT, Dall’Ava-Santucci J: Blood gas measurement during exercise: a comparative study between arterialized earlobe sampling and direct arterial puncture in adults. Eur Respir J 1998;11:712–715.
Hoffmann U, Essfeld D, Stegemann J: Comparison of arterial, end-tidal and transcutaneous PCO2 during moderate exercise and external CO2 loading in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990;61:1–4.
Sridhar MK, Carter R, Moran F, Banham SW: Use of a combined oxygen and carbon dioxide transcutaneous electrode in the estimation of gas exchange during exercise. Thorax 1993;48:643–647.
Kentala E, Repo UK: Feasibility of cutaneous blood gas monitoring during exercise stress testing. Ann Clin Res 1984;16:40–46.
Carter R, Banham SW: Use of transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions for assessing indices of gas exchange during exercise testing. Respir Med 2000;94:350–355.
Severinghaus JW, Stafford M, Bradley AF: tcPCO2 electrode design, calibration and temperature gradient problems. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1978;68:118–122.
Bernet-Buettiker V, Ugarte MJ, Frey B, Hug MI, Baenziger O, Weiss M: Evaluation of a new combined transcutaneous measurement of PCO2/pulse oximetry oxygen saturation ear sensor in newborn patients. Pediatrics 2005;115:e64–e68.
Dullenkopf A, Bernardo SD, Berger F, Fasnacht M, Gerber AC, Weiss M: Evaluation of a new combined SpO2/PtcCO2 sensor in anaesthetized paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2003;13:777–784.
Bendjelid K, Schutz N, Stotz M, Gerard I, Suter PM, Romand JA: Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring in critically ill adults: clinical evaluation of a new sensor. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2203–2206.
Senn O, Clarenbach CF, Kaplan V, Maggiorini M, Bloch KE: Monitoring carbon dioxide tension and arterial oxygen saturation by a single earlobe sensor in patients with critical illness or sleep apnea. Chest 2005;128:1291–1296.
Bolliger D, Steiner LA, Kasper J, Aziz OA, Filipovic M, Seeberger MD: The accuracy of non-invasive carbon dioxide monitoring: a clinical evaluation of two transcutaneous systems. Anaesthesia 2007;62:394–399.
Parker SM, Gibson GJ: Evaluation of a transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor (‘TOSCA’) in adult patients in routine respiratory practice. Respir Med 2007;101:261–264.
Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i: 307–310.
Technology Subcommittee of the Working Group on Critical Care, Ontario Ministry of Health: Noninvasive blood gas monitoring: a review for use in the adult critical care unit. CMAJ 1992;146:703–712.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.