Background: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is able to detect variations in regional lung electrical impedance associated with changes in both air and blood content and potentially capable of assessing regional ventilation-perfusion relationships. However, regional lung perfusion is difficult to determine because the impedance changes synchronous with the heart rate are of very small amplitude. Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the redistribution of lung perfusion elicited by one-lung ventilation using EIT with a novel region-of-interest analysis. Methods: Ten patients (65 ± 9 years, mean age ± SD) scheduled for elective chest surgery were studied after intubation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube during bilateral and unilateral ventilation of the right and left lungs. EIT data were acquired at a rate of 25 scans/s. Relative impedance changes synchronous with the heart rate were evaluated in the right and left lung regions. Results: During bilateral ventilation, the mean right-to-left lung ratio of the sum of heart rate-related impedance changes was 1.12 ± 0.20, but the ratio significantly changed (0.81 ± 0.16 and 1.48 ± 0.37) during unilateral left- and right-lung ventilation with reduced perfusion of the non-ventilated lung. Increased perfusion most likely occurred in the ventilated lung because the impedance values summed over both regions did not change (0.62 ± 0.23 vs. 0.58 ± 0.22) compared with bilateral ventilation. Conclusions: Our results indicate that redistribution of regional lung perfusion can be assessed by EIT during one-lung ventilation. The performance of EIT in detecting changes in lung perfusion in even smaller lung regions remains to be established.

1.
Frerichs I: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in applications related to lung and ventilation: a review of experimental and clinical activities. Physiol Meas 2000;21:R1–R21.
2.
Frerichs I, Dargaville PA, Dudykevych T, Rimensberger PC: Electrical impedance tomography: a method for monitoring regional lung aeration and tidal volume distribution? Intensive Care Med 2003;29:2312–2316.
3.
Hinz J, Hahn G, Neumann P, Sydow M, Mohrenweiser P, Hellige G, Burchardi H: End-expiratory lung impedance change enables bedside monitoring of end-expiratory lung volume change. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:37–43.
4.
Luepschen H, Meier T, Grossherr M, Leibecke T, Karsten J, Leonhardt S: Protective ventilation using electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 2007;28:S247–S260.
5.
Odenstedt H, Lindgren S, Olegard C, Erlandsson K, Lethvall S, Aneman A, Stenqvist O, Lundin S: Slow moderate pressure recruitment maneuver minimizes negative circulatory and lung mechanic side effects: evaluation of recruitment maneuvers using electric impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:1706–1714.
6.
Wolf GK, Arnold JH: Noninvasive assessment of lung volume: respiratory inductance plethysmography and electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care Med 2005;33:S163–S169.
7.
Kunst PW, de Vries PM, Postmus PE, Bakker J: Evaluation of electrical impedance tomography in the measurement of PEEP-induced changes in lung volume. Chest 1999;115:1102–1106.
8.
Frerichs I, Hinz J, Herrmann P, Weisser G, Hahn G, Dudykevych T, Quintel M, Hellige G: Detection of local lung air content by electrical impedance tomography compared with electron beam CT. J Appl Physiol 2002;93:660–666.
9.
Victorino JA, Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Tucci MR, Caramez MP, Tanaka H, Sipmann FS, Santos DC, Barbas CS, Carvalho CR, Amato MB: Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:791–800.
10.
Hinz J, Neumann P, Dudykevych T, Andersson LG, Wrigge H, Burchardi H, Hedenstierna G: Regional ventilation by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with ventilation scintigraphy in pigs. Chest 2003;124:314–322.
11.
Eyuboglu BM, Brown BH: Methods of cardiac gating applied potential tomography. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1988;9(suppl A):43–48.
12.
Barber DC: Quantification in impedance imaging. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1990;11(suppl A):45–56.
13.
Morucci JP, Marsili PM: Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part III. Impedance imaging. Second section: reconstruction algorithms. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1996;24:599–654.
14.
Boone K, Barber D, Brown B: Imaging with electricity: report of the European concerted action on impedance tomography. J Med Eng Technol 1997;21:201–232.
15.
Seagar AD, Barber DC, Brown BH: Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in impedance imaging. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1987;8(suppl A):13–31.
16.
Eyuboglu BM, Brown BH, Barber DC, Seagar AD: Localisation of cardiac related impedance changes in the thorax. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1987;8(suppl A):167–173.
17.
Zadehkoochak M, Blott BH, Hames TK, George RF: Pulmonary perfusion and ventricular ejection imaging by frequency domain filtering of EIT (electrical impedance tomography) images. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1992;13(suppl A):191–196.
18.
Dunlop S, Hough J, Riedel T, Fraser JF, Dunster K, Schibler A: Electrical impedance tomography in extremely prematurely born infants and during high frequency oscillatory ventilation analyzed in the frequency domain. Physiol Meas 2006;27:1151–1165.
19.
Kerrouche N, McLeod CN, Lionheart WR: Time series of EIT chest images using singular value decomposition and Fourier transform. Physiol Meas 2001;22:147–157.
20.
Smit HJ, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Roeleveld RJ, Bronzwaer JG, Postmus PE, de Vries PM, Boonstra A: Epoprostenol-induced pulmonary vasodilatation in patients with pulmonary hypertension measured by electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 2002;23:237–243.
21.
Smit HJ, Handoko ML, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Faes TJ, Postmus PE, de Vries PM, Boonstra A: Electrical impedance tomography to measure pulmonary perfusion: is the reproducibility high enough for clinical practice? Physiol Meas 2003;24:491–499.
22.
Vonk Noordegraaf A, Kunst PW, Janse A, Smulders RA, Heethaar RM, Postmus PE, Faes TJ, de Vries PM: Validity and reproducibility of electrical impedance tomography for measurement of calf blood flow in healthy subjects. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997;35:107–112.
23.
Vonk Noordegraaf A, Kunst PW, Janse A, Marcus JT, Postmus PE, Faes TJ, de Vries PM: Pulmonary perfusion measured by means of electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 1998;19:263–273.
24.
Patterson RP, Zhang J, Mason LI, Jerosch-Herold M: Variability in the cardiac EIT image as a function of electrode position, lung volume and body position. Physiol Meas 2001;22:159–166.
25.
Deibele JM, Luepschen H, Leonhardt S: Dynamic separation of pulmonary and cardiac changes in electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 2008;29:S1–S14.
26.
Frerichs I, Hinz J, Herrmann P, Weisser G, Hahn G, Quintel M, Hellige G: Regional lung perfusion as determined by electrical impedance tomography in comparison with electron beam CT imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:646–652.
27.
Isaacson D, Mueller JL, Newell JC, Siltanen S: Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas 2006;27:S43–S50.
28.
McArdle FJ, Suggett AJ, Brown BH, Barber DC: An assessment of dynamic images by applied potential tomography for monitoring pulmonary perfusion. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1988;9(suppl A):87–91.
29.
Newell JC, Blue RS, Isaacson D, Saulnier GJ, Ross AS: Phasic three-dimensional impedance imaging of cardiac activity. Physiol Meas 2002;23:203–209.
30.
Smit HJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Boonstra A, de Vries PM, Postmus PE: Assessment of the pulmonary volume pulse in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension by means of electrical impedance tomography. Respiration 2006;73:597–602.
31.
Smit HJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Marcus JT, van der Weijden S, Postmus PE, de Vries PM, Boonstra A: Pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia and hyperoxia in healthy volunteers and COPD patients measured by electrical impedance tomography. Chest 2003;123:1803–1809.
32.
Hannallah MS, Benumof JL, McCarthy PO, Liang M: Comparison of three techniques to inflate the bronchial cuff of left polyvinylchloride double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg 1993;77:990–994.
33.
Barber DC, Seagar AD: Fast reconstruction of resistance images. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1987;8(suppl A):47–54.
34.
Kuhnel G, Hahn G, Frerichs I, Schroder T, Hellige G: New methods for improving the image quality of functional electric impedance tomography (in German). Biomed Tech (Berl) 1997;42(suppl):470–471.
35.
Pulletz S, van Genderingen HR, Schmitz G, Zick G, Schadler D, Scholz J, Weiler N, Frerichs I: Comparison of different methods to define regions of interest for evaluation of regional lung ventilation by EIT. Physiol Meas 2006;27:S115–S127.
36.
Hahn G, Thiel F, Dudykevych T, Frerichs I, Gersing E, Schroder T, Hartung C, Hellige G: Quantitative evaluation of the performance of different electrical tomography devices. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2001;46:91–95.
37.
Lindley EJ, Brown BH, Barber DC, Grundy D, Knowles R, McArdle FJ, Wilson AJ: Monitoring body fluid distribution in microgravity using impedance tomography (APT (applied potential tomography)). Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1992;13(suppl A):181–184.
38.
Lionheart WR: EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments. Physiol Meas 2004;25:125–142.
39.
Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Suki B, Hedlund A, Sjostrand UH, Markstrom A, Kawati R, Hedenstierna G, Guttmann J: Decreasing size of cardiogenic oscillations reflects decreasing compliance of the respiratory system during long-term ventilation. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:879–884.
40.
Brown BH, Leathard A, Sinton A, McArdle FJ, Smith RW, Barber DC: Blood flow imaging using electrical impedance tomography. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1992;13(suppl A): 175–179.
41.
Rabbani KS, Kabir AM: Studies on the effect of the third dimension on a two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography system. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1991;12:393–402.
42.
Hoffman EA, Chon D: Computed tomography studies of lung ventilation and perfusion. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2005;2:492–498, 506.
43.
Harris RS, Schuster DP: Visualizing lung function with positron emission tomography. J Appl Physiol 2007;102:448–458.
44.
Petersson J, Sanchez-Crespo A, Larsson SA, Mure M: Physiological imaging of the lung: single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). J Appl Physiol 2007;102:468–476.
45.
Kunst PW, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Hoekstra OS, Postmus PE, de Vries PM: Ventilation and perfusion imaging by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with radionuclide scanning. Physiol Meas 1998;19:481–490.
46.
Sun RY, Nieman GF, Hakim TS, Chang HK: Effects of lung volume and alveolar surface tension on pulmonary vascular resistance. J Appl Physiol 1987;62:1622–1626.
47.
Baile EM, Pare PD, Brooks LA, Hogg JC: Relationship between regional lung volume and regional pulmonary vascular resistance. J Appl Physiol 1982;52:914–920.
48.
Bindslev L, Jolin A, Hedenstierna G, Baehrendtz S, Santesson J: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the human lung: effect of repeated hypoxic challenges during anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1985;62:621–625.
49.
Carlsson AJ, Bindslev L, Hedenstierna G: Hypoxia-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction in the human lung. The effect of isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987;66:312–316.
50.
Carlsson AJ, Bindslev L, Santesson J, Gottlieb I, Hedenstierna G: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in the human lung: the effect of prolonged unilateral hypoxic challenge during anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985;29:346–351.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.