Background: Parapneumonic effusions cause significant morbidity and mortality despite current developments in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Causative microorganisms may remain unidentified in a significant number of patients by cultures and Gram smears. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular technique for the detection of causative bacteria; however, its efficiency in pleural fluids is less known. Objectives: The present study was performed to compare the efficiency of PCR in the detection of the three most common organisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophylus influenzae) with conventional methods. Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with parapneumonic pleural effusions were studied. On admission, pleural fluid samples were obtained for Gram staining, routine culture and PCR analysis for S. aureus, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Results: PCR analysis allowed detection of 11 microorganisms in 10 patients (35.7%), whereas pleural fluid cultures detected the etiological agent in only 2 (7.1%). S. pneumoniae was the most frequent agent. Conclusions: Pleural fluid cultures may have low diagnostic yields, partly due to prior antibiotic use. Pleural fluid PCR analysis may improve the etiologic diagnosis in parapneumonic pleural effusions, with technical advances leading to higher yields than obtained in this study.

Keywords:
Parapneumonic pleural effusion, pediatric, Polymerase chain reaction, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae
1.
Bryant RE, Salmon CJ: Pleural effusion and empyema; in Mandell GL, Dolin R, Bennett JE (eds): Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, ed 5. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone, 2000, pp 743–750.
2.
McLaughlin FJ, Goldmann DA, Rosenbaum DM, Harris GBC, Schuster SR, Strieder DJ: Empyema in children: clinical course and long-term follow-up. Pediatrics 1984;73:587–593.
3.
Givan DC, Eigen H: Common pleural effusions in children. Clin Chest Med 1998;19:363–371.
4.
Lewis KT, Bukstein DA: Parapneumonic empyema in children: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 1992;46:1443–1455.
5.
Chonmaitree T, Powell KR: Parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema in children. Review of a 19-year experience, 1962–1980. Clin Pediatr 1983;22:414–419.
6.
de Hoyos A, Sundaresan S: Thoracic empyema. Surg Clin North Am 2002;82:643–671.
7.
Sriram PS, Winer-Muram H, Antony V: When should decortication be done in patients with pleural disease? Clin Pulm Med 2002;9:97–104.
8.
Efrati O, Barak A: Pleural effusions in the pediatric population. Pediatr Rev 2002;23:417–426.
9.
Mocelin HT, Fischer GB: Epidemiology, presentation and treatment of pleural effusion. Pediatr Resp Rev 2002;3:292–297.
10.
Brook I, Frazier EH: Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of empyema. Chest 1993;103:1502–1507.
11.
Brook I: Microbiology of empyema in children. Pediatrics 1990;85:722–726.
12.
Alfageme I, Munoz F, Pena N, Umbria S: Empyema of the thorax in adults. Etiology, microbiologic findings, and management. Chest 1993;103:839–843.
13.
Heffner JE: Infection of the pleural space. Clin Chest Med 1999;20:607–622.
14.
Utine GE, Özçelik U, Yalcin E, Dogru D, Kiper N, Aslan A, Kanra G: Childhood parapneumonic effusions: biochemical and inflammatory markers. Chest 2005;128:1436–1441.
15.
Corless CE, Guiver M, Borrow R, Edwards-Jones V, Fox AJ, Kaczmarski EB: Simultaneous detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in suspected cases of meningitis and septicemia using real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:1553–1558.
16.
Grisold AJ, Leitner E, Mühlbauer G, Marth E, Kessler HH: Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous confirmation by automated nucleic acid extraction and real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:2392–2397.
17.
Falguera M, Lopez A, Nogues A, Porcel J, Rubio-Caballero M: Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA in pleural fluid samples. Chest 2002;122:2212–2216.
18.
Vuori-Holopainen E, Salo E, Saxen H, Hedman K, Hyypia T, Lahdenpera R, Leinonen M, Tarkka E, Vaara M, Peltola H: Etiological diagnosis of childhood pneumonia by use of transthoracic needle aspiration and modern microbiological methods. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:583–590.
19.
Menezes-Martins LF, Menezes-Martins JJ, Michaelsen VS, Aguiar BB, Ermel T, Machado DC: Diagnosis of parapneumonic pleural effusion by polymerase chain reaction in children. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1106–1110.
20.
Le Monnier A, Carbonnelle E, Zahar JR, Le Bourgeois M, Abachin E, Quesne G, Varon E, Descamps P, De Blic J, Scheinmann P, Berche P, Ferroni A: Microbiological diagnosis of empyema in children: comparative evaluations by culture, polymerase chain reaction and pneumococcal antigen detection in pleural fluids. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1135–1140.
21.
Saglani S, Harris KA, Wallis C, Hartley JC: Empyema: the use of broad range 16s rDNA PCR for pathogen detection. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:70–73.
22.
McIntosh K: Community-acquired pneumonia in children. N Engl J Med 2002;346:429–437.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.