Background: The variability of maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) in response to repeated measurement affects its reliability; published studies have used between three and twenty PImax measurements on a single occasion. Objective: This study investigated the influence of a specific respiratory ‘warm-up’ upon the repeated measurement of inspiratory muscle strength and attempts to establish a procedure by which PImax can be assessed with maximum reliability using the smallest number of manoeuvres. Methods: Fourteen healthy subjects, familiar with the Mueller manoeuvre, were studied. The influence of repeated testing on a single occasion was assessed using an 18-measurement protocol. Using a randomised cross-over design, subjects performed the protocol, preceded by a specific respiratory warm-up (RWU) and on another occasion, without any preliminary activity (control). Comparisons were made amongst ‘baseline’ (best of the first 3 measurements), ‘short’ series (best of 7th to 9th measurement) and ‘long’ series (best of the last 3 measurements). Results: Under control conditions, the mean increase (‘baseline’ vs. ‘long’ series) was 11.4 (5.8)%; following the RWU, the increase (post RWU ‘baseline’ vs. ‘long’ series) was 3.2 (10.0)%. There were statistically significant differences between measurements made at all 3 protocol stages (‘baseline’, ‘short’ and ‘long’ series) under control conditions, but none following the RWU. Conclusions: The present data suggest that a specific RWU may attenuate the ‘learning effect’ during repeated PImax measurements, which is one of the main contributors of the test variability. The use of a RWU may provide a means of obtaining reliable values of PImax following just 3 measurements.

Larson JL, Covey MK, Vitalo CA, Alex CG, Patel M, Kim MJ: Maximal inspiratory pressure. Learning effect and test-retest reliability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 1993;104:448–453.
Astrand P-O, Rodahl K: Textbook of Work Physiology, ed 3. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1986, pp 295–353.
Wen AS, Woo MS, Keens TG: How many manoeuvres are required to measure maximal inspiratory pressure accurately? Chest 1997;111:802–807.
Fiz JA, Montserrat JM, Picado C, Plaza V, Agusti-Vidal A: How many measurements should be done to measure maximal inspiratory mouth pressures in patients with chronic airflow obstruction? Thorax 1989;44:419–421.
Volianitis S, McConnell AK, Koutedakis Y, Jones DA: The influence of prior activity upon inspiratory muscle strength in rowers and non-rowers. Int J Sports Med 1999;20:542–547.
Mier-Jedrzejowicz A, Brophy C, Green M: Respiratory muscle weakness during upper respiratory tract infections. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;138:5–7.
Hamnegard CH, Wragg S, Kyroussis D, Aquilina R, Moxham J, Green M: Portable measurement of maximum mouth pressures. Eur Respir J 1994;7:398–401.
Roussos CS, Macklem PT: Diaphragmatic fatigue in man. J Appl Physiol 1977;43:189–197.
Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307–310.
Wijkstra PJ, van der Mark TW, Boezen M, van Altena R, Postma DS, Koeter GH: Peak inspiratory mouth pressure in healthy subjects and in patients with COPD. Chest 1995;107:652–656.
Maillard JO, Burdet L, van Melle G, Fitting JW: Reproducibility of twitch mouth pressure, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, and maximal inspiratory pressure. Eur Respir J 1998;11:901–905.
Aldrich TK, Spiro P: Maximal inspiratory pressure: Does reproducibility indicate full effort? Thorax 1995;50:40–43.
Gandevia SG, McKenzie DK: Activation of the human diaphragm during maximal voluntary contractions. J Physiol (Lond) 1985;367:45–56.
Bellemare F, Bigland-Ritchie B: Assessment of human diaphragm strength and activation using phrenic nerve stimulation. Respir Physiol 1984;58:263–277.
McKenzie DK, Allen GM, Gandevia SC: Reduced voluntary drive to the human diaphragm at low lung volumes. Respir Physiol 1996;105:69–76.
Gandevia SC, Macefield D, Burke D: Voluntary activation of human motor axons in the absence of muscle afferent feedback. Brain 1990;113:1563–1581.
Butler JE, McKenzie DK, Crawford MR, et al: Role of airway receptors in the reflex responses of human inspiratory muscles to airway occlusion. J Physiol (Lond)1995;487:273–281.
Komi PV: Strength and Power in Sport. International Olympic Committee. Oxford, Blackwell, 1992, p 260.
Bellemare F, Grassino A: Evaluation of the human diaphragm fatigue. J Appl Physiol 1982;53:1196–1206.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.