Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a set of prediction equations and 90% confidence intervals for static lung volumes using the multibreath helium equilibration method from a sample of asymptomatic Caucasian subjects of Spanish descent. Moreover, these equations were compared with those of previous studies. Methods: Measurements of static lung volumes using techniques recommended by the American Thoracic Society and the European Community for Steel and Coal were carried out on a selected sample of 591 healthy nonsmoking volunteers (305 men and 286 women) aged 18–88 years, living in the metropolitan area of Valencia, on the east coast of Spain. Multiple regression analysis using height, age and weight as independent variables were used to provide predicted values for both sexes. These reference values were compared with other sets of prediction equations reported in the literature using an independent sample of 69 subjects (32 men and 37 women). Results: Simple linear regression equations using age, height and body weight predicted all the subdivisions of lung volumes (vital capacity, expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity, functional residual capacity (FRC), residual volume (RV), total lung capacity (TLC), FRC/TLC and RV/TLC) as well as more complex equational models. The distribution of residuals fulfilled the assumptions of multiple regression analysis (independence, homoscedasticity and Gaussian distribution of residuals), except for ERV, using simple linear models. The derived equations did not differ significantly from most of the previously reported equations and were usually superior in their ability to predict the lung volumes. Conclusions: The use of the present prediction equations is recommended in the Latin population of Spanish descent and in populations with similar Caucasian characteristics.

1.
Quanjer PhH: Standardized lung function testing. Eur Respir J 1993;6(suppl 16):3–102s.
2.
Stocks J, Quanjer PhH: Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. Eur Respir J 1995;8:492–506.
3.
Quanjer PhH (ed): Standardized lung function testing. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Coal and Steel. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1983;19(suppl 5):1–95.
4.
Hall AM, Heywood C, Cotes JE: Lung function in healthy British women. Thorax 1979;34:359–365.
5.
Grimby G, Soderholm B: Spirometric studies in normal subjects. Acta Med Scand 1963;173:199–206.
6.
Ferris BG: Epidemiology standardization project. Am Rev Respir Dis 1978;118(part 2):55–111).
7.
Alastrué A, Rull M, Camps I, Ginesta C, Melus MR, Salvá JA: Valoración antropométrica del estado de nutrición. Normas y criterios de desnutrición y obesidad. Med Clin (Barc) 1988;91: 223–236.
8.
American Thoracic Society: Standardization of spirometry – 1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:1285–1298.
9.
Pincock AC, Miller MR: The effect of temperature on recording spirograms. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128:894–898.
10.
Birath G, Swenson EW: A correction factor for helium absorption in lung volume determinations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1956;8:155–158.
11.
Goldman HI, Becklake MR: Respiratory function tests: Normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. Am Rev Tuberc 1959;79:457–467.
12.
Crapo RO, Morris AH, Clayton PD, Nixon CR: Lung volumes in healthy nonsmoking adults. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1982;18:419–425.
13.
Boren HG, Kory RC, Syner JC: The lung volume and its subdivision in normal men. Am J Med 1966;41:96–114.
14.
Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors and the Society of Actuaries. 1979 Build and Blood Pressure Study.
15.
Van Ganse W, Billiet L, Ferris BG Jr: Medical criteria for the selection of normal subjects. Panminerva Med 1970;1:15–27.
16.
Clausen JL: Prediction of normal values in pulmonary function testing. Clin Chest Med 1989;10:135–143.
17.
Donnelly PM, Yang T-S, Peat JK, Woolcock AJ: What factors explain racial differences in lung volumes?. Eur Respir J 1991;4:829–838.
18.
Yang T-S, Peat J, Keena V, Donnelly P, Unger W, Woolcock A: A review of the racial differences in the lung function of normal Caucasian, Chinese and Indian subjects. Eur Respir J 1991;4:872–880.
19.
American Thoracic Society: Lung function testing: Selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:1202–1218.
20.
Clanton TL, Dixon CF, Drake J, Gadek JE: Effects of swim training on lung volumes and inspiratory muscle conditioning. J Appl Physiol 1987;62:39–46.
21.
Malik SL, Singh IP: Ventilatory capacity among highland Bods: A possible adaptive mechanism at high altitude. Ann Hum Biol 1979;6:471–476.
22.
American Thoracic Society: Snowbird workshop on standardization of spirometry. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;119:831–837.
23.
Hetzel MR: The pulmonary clock. Thorax 1981;36:481–486.
24.
Halberg F: Chronobiology and the lung: Implications and applications. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1987;23:529–531.
25.
Pierson DJ, Dick NP, Petty TL: A comparison of spirometric values with subjects in standing and sitting positions. Chest 1976;70:17–20.
26.
Townsend MC: Spirometric forced expiratory volumes measured in the standing versus the sitting posture. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:123–124.
27.
Bates DV (ed): Respiratory Function Disease, ed 3. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1989;106–151.
28.
Pierce RJ, Brown DJ, Denison DM: Radiographic, scintigraphic and gas dilution estimates of individual lung and blood volumes in man. Thorax 1980;35:777–780.
29.
Reger RB, Young A, Morgan WKC: An accurate and rapid radiographic method for determining total lung capacity. Thorax 1972;27:163–168.
30.
Barrett WA, Clayton WD, Lambson CR, Morris AH: Computerized roentgenographic determination of total lung capacity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976;113:239–244.
31.
Block AJ, Bush CM, White C, Boysen PG, Wynne JW, Taasan VC: A radiographic method for measuring steady-state functional residual capacity in the supine patient. A method suitable for sleep studies. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;124:330–332.
32.
Amrein R, Keller R, Joos H, Herzog H: Valeurs théoriques nouvelles de l’exploration de la fonction ventilatoire du poumon. Bull Physiopathol Respir 1970;6:317–349.
33.
Teculescu DB: Validity, variability and reproducibility of single-breath total lung capacity determinations in normal subjects. Bull Physiopathol Respir 1971;7:645–658.
34.
Roca J, Burgos F, Barberà JA, Sunyer J, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Castellsagué J, Sanchis J, Antó JM, Casan P, Clausen JL: Variability of static lung volumes: Reference values from a Mediterranean population. Eur Respir J 1994;7(suppl 18):355s.
35.
Crapo RO, Morris AH, Gardner RM: Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;123:659–664.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.