The success rate of cytological examination of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in patients with primary or metastatic lung tumors varies considerably according to different authors. In a prospective study, we have tried to establish the sensitivity of BAL in comparison with both transbronchial lung biopsy (TBB) and brushing. BAL was performed in 61 patients with lung malignancies and in 56 patients with nonmalignant lung disease: 39 patients had primary lung cancer, 22 had metastatic spread into the lungs. First the part of the lung involved was washed out with 100 ml physiological saline solution during bronchoscopy. Following BAL, 5 TBB and brushing were performed. The smears were stained by the May-Grünwald-Giemsa method. Malignant cells were found in BALF from 17 patients, in TBB specimens from 43 and in brushing smears from 26. TBB was significantly the most successful method applied. Malignant cells were never found in BALF only, nor were they ever found in patients with non-malignant lung disease. The sensitivity of the three methods was equal for primary as compared to metastatic tumors and for interstitial infiltrates as compared to coin lesions. Malignant cells were most frequently found in centrifuged specimens. BAL may be used in suspected malignant interstitial or rounded pulmonary infiltrates when it cannot be reached by forceps or brush, or when TBB and brushing are contra-indicated.

Keywords:
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, Cytology, Lung neoplasms, Transbronchial lung biopsy, Brushing
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
1994
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.