This study examined the effect of the standing versus the sitting position on spirometric indices in 94 healthy non-obese adult subjects (41 men and 53 women) with the order of testing randomised. On average all the spirometric indices examined, except the peak expiratory flow rate, were higher in the standing compared to the sitting position although the change was only significant at the 5% level for FEV1 in women. The fall in FEV1 with the change in position was statistically related to the ponderal index but not to age, height or the initial lung function level. A uniform posture for spirometry is recommended in epidemiological studies examining longitudinal trends in lung function, as well as in cross-sectional aetiological studies examining, for instance, the effects of environmental and/or occupational exposures. A uniform posture is also recommended for clinical studies which involve repeated measurements over time, for instance to measure the effect of treatment or the natural history of airways disease

Keywords:
Lung function, Epidemiologic studies, Ponderal index
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1991 S. Karger AG, Basel
1991
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.