The detrimental effects of smoking on lung function have been recognized for several decades. Evidence comes from cross-sectional studies which emphasize that damage, certainly at the level of the small airways, may be detectable after a relatively short smoking history, and from longitudinal studies which show that smoking is associated with an increased rate of function loss over time. Implicit in most published evaluations of the evidence has been the concept that smoking is a habit taken up at random by the general population, and that those who do and do not take up the habit start out with similar levels of lung function. Published material was reviewed for evidence to the contrary, consistent with a health selection process similar to that shown in relation to workplace exposures and labeled the ‘healthy worker’ effect. Despite the wealth of published data on the topic of lung function in relation to the smoking habit, much is presented in a way which does not permit the concept of the ‘healthy smoker’ to be addressed. Nevertheless, this review revealed sufficient evidence from cross-sectional studies, as well as evidence from one longitudinal study to support the concept of the ‘healthy smoker’ as an individual who takes up the habit because his/her lungs are relatively resistant to the effects of smoking. If correct, this means that previous studies, particularly those which were cross-sectional in design and focussed on younger persons, are likely to have underestimated the consequences of smoking on lung function. The concept of the ‘healthy smoker’ may also throw light on characteristics which identify the ‘susceptible smoker’

Keywords:
Health selection, Healthy worker, Healthy smoker
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1990 S. Karger AG, Basel
1990
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.